Advertisement

Legal Rights of Children

  • Lenore E. WalkerEmail author
  • David Shapiro
  • Stephanie Akl
Chapter
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The U.S is only one of the two countries around the world that did not sign onto the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) that changed the legal perception of a child as having different wishes and feelings from the parent. Although the CRC does support the need for a cohesive family, it also emphasized the need to facilitate the growing independence and autonomy of the child by encouraging participation in legal proceedings that impact their life. In many different legal proceedings, children’s best interests may be represented by a lawyer or guardian ad litem, but not their wishes. We discuss research in different countries where children are encouraged to participate as much as their developmental age permits to express their wishes but also knowing that they may not get them granted. Nonetheless, the power of participation makes a big difference in their adjustment to whatever final decision is made. The arguments against participation especially in custody decisions are discussed including those fearing the child will be pulled into the middle of the parent’s disagreements and forced to take sides. While this may certainly occur, research shows that when it does, the child’s ability to have a mental health professional or sensitive judge to speak with may actually provide help for the child to process their own feelings that surface after they may parrot what their parent tells them to say. The issue, of course, is to find sensitive judges who know how to listen, show respect, and talk to children. Several model projects are described as are assessment of mental status and competency skills needed by mental health professionals.

Keywords

Convention on the rights of the child Best interests of the child Wishes of the child Power of participation Competency evaluations Empowerment 

References

  1. Gal, T., & Duramy, B. F. (Eds.) (2015). International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies. New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Israeli Ministry of Justice. (2003). Report of the committee for the examination of the basic principles in the area of child and the Law.Google Scholar
  3. Kaslow, F. W. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of couple and family forensics: A sourcebook for mental health and legal professionals. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Kleinman, T. G., & Pollack, D. (2017). Domestic abuse, child custody, and visitation winning in family court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kleinman, T. G., & Walker, L. E. (2014). Protecting psychotherapy clients from the shadow of the law: A call for the revision of the association of family and conciliation courts (AFCC) guidelines for court-involved therapy. J Child Custody, 11(4), 335–362.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2014.992563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morag, T., & Sorek, S. (2015). Children’s participation in Israeli family courts: An account of an ongoing learning process. In Gal, T. & Duramy, B. F. (Eds.) (2015). International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 157–179). New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Parkinson, P., & Cashmore, J. (2008). The voice of the child in family law disputes. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Shapiro, D. L., & Walker, L. E. A. (2019). Forensic practice for mental health clinicians. New York, NY: TPI.Google Scholar
  9. Taylor, N., Fitzgerald, R. M., Tamar, M., Bajpai, A., & Graham, A. (2012). International models of child participation in family law proceedings following parental separation, divorce. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20, 645–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Walker, L. E. A., Cummings, D. M., & Cummings, N. A. (2013). Our broken family court system. Dryden, NY: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
  11. Walker, L. E. A. (2017). The battered woman syndrome (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lenore E. Walker
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Shapiro
    • 2
  • Stephanie Akl
    • 3
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA
  2. 2.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA
  3. 3.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations