Advertisement

A South African Experience of Building Energy Retrofit Project Challenges and Solutions

  • Chikezirim Okorafor
  • Fidelis EmuzeEmail author
  • Dillip Kumar Das
Conference paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Delivering building energy retrofit project will bring about economic gains, while enhancing social well-being and engendering sustainable development. However, building energy retrofit projects encompass additional considerations and requirements in terms of process, material, expertise, and technology. All these factors constitute complexities in the delivery of the project. In addressing this problem, the paper presents how stakeholders understand implementation challenges in the delivering of projects amongst South African service providers. The case-based study highlighted the challenges, and solution concerning the methodologies that are appropriate in ameliorating the situations.

Keywords

Building Challenges Energy Retrofit 

References

  1. Cheung, M., Foo, S., & Granadino, J. (2000). Seismic retrofit of existing buildings: Innovative alternatives (pp. 1–10). Canada: Public Works and Government Services.Google Scholar
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E., & Kolokotsa, D. (2008). Towards a multi-objective optimization approach for improving energy efficiency in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 40(9), 1747–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon, T. (2014). Commercial property retrofitting. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 32, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Godwin, P. (2011). Building conservation and sustainability in the United Kingdom. Procedia Engineering, 20, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real World (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report (AR4). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kaya, Y. (1990). Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, Paris. (Mimeo).Google Scholar
  9. Ma, Z., Cooper, P., Daly, D., & Ledo, L. (2012). Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55, 889–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller, E., & Buys, L. (2011). Retrofitting commercial office buildings for sustainability: Tenants expectations and experiences. Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment, 3, 33–50.Google Scholar
  11. Oppong, R. A., & Masahudu, M. (2014). Exploration of building adaptation and retrofitting challenges in Ghana: The case study of selected rural bank projects. Structural Survey, 32, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Fuss, S., Jackson, R. B., Korsbakken, J. I., … Nakicenovic, N. (2017). Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 7, 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pielke, R. A. (2010). The carbon economy and climate mitigation: An editorial essay. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 770–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rivers, N. (2010). Impacts of climate policy on the competitiveness of Canadian industry: How big and how to mitigate? Energy Economics, 32, 1092–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.01.003, ISSN: 0140–9883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sullivan, L., Mark, B. and Parnell, T. (2006). Lessons for the application of renewable energy technologies in high density urban locations. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA 2006), Geneva, Switzerland, 6–8 September 2006Google Scholar
  16. Sutrisna, M. (2009). Research methodology in doctoral research: Understanding the meaning of conducting qualitative research. Working paper presented in ARCOM Doctorial Workshop. John Moores University, Liverpool, 12 May 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Svirejeva-Hopkins, A., Schellnhuber, H. J., & Pomaz, V. L. (2004). Urbanised territories as a specific component of the Global Carbon Cycle. Ecological Modelling, 173(2–3), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, S., Yan, C., & Xiao, F. (2012). Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings. Energy and Buildings, 55, 873–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilkinson, S. (2011). The sustainable retrofit potential in lower quality office stock in the central business district. Amsterdam: Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment.Google Scholar
  20. Wilkinson, S. (2012). Analysing sustainable retrofit potential in premium office buildings. Structural Survey, 30, 398–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World commission on environment and development. New York: United Nations. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chikezirim Okorafor
    • 1
  • Fidelis Emuze
    • 2
    Email author
  • Dillip Kumar Das
    • 3
  1. 1.Unit for Lean Construction and SustainabilityCentral University of Technology Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Built EnvironmentCentral University of Technology Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information TechnologyCentral University of Technology Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations