Advertisement

Are Construction Professionals Equipped with the Knowledge and Tools to Address the Sustainability Dilemma?

  • Paul MundyEmail author
  • Colin A. Booth
Conference paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

This study attempts to explore the depth of knowledge and understanding of sustainability issues across a range of construction professions and utilise this evidence to reveal if Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) is being delivered with due diligence across the industry. A range of construction professionals, key actors in achieving sustainability across the built environment through their advisory roles in design and specification, were interviewed (n = 7). It became apparent that knowledge and understanding of sustainability was certainly below an expected level of competence suitable to deliver solutions across the multifaceted sustainability crisis, with many professionals failing to see beyond energy efficiency and carbon reduction. Furthermore, it revealed that planning policy changes incorporating BREEAM as a condition has had negative effects, leading clients and professionals to engage only when required. It was also evident that BREEAM schemes are being used with the goal to obtain development consents and cost was determining actions taken rather than best sustainability outcomes. This results in both BREEAM and Sustainability being perceived as an add-ons rather than core elements or drivers of a project and, in doing so, reduces the effectiveness of the design. Based on this evidence, it is proposed that there is a timely need to change construction professionals’ perceptions to achieve a truly sustainable built environment. With BREEAM being one of many similar certification schemes it is worrying that these findings may the same elsewhere around the world.

Keywords

BREEAM Green building certification Sustainable buildings 

References

  1. Ameen, R., Mourshed, M., & Li, H. (2015). A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow, S. (2011). Guide to BREEAM. London: RIBA Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Berardi, U. (2013). Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cinquemani, V., & Prior, J. (2011). Integrating BREEAM throughout the design process: A guide to achieving higher BREEAM and code for sustainable homes ratings (FB 28). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, R. (2010). Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles. Building Research & Information, 33(5), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon, T., Colantonio, A., Shiers, D., Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., & Gallimore, P. (2008). A green profession? A global survey of RICS members and their engagement with the sustainability agenda. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(6), 460–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gil, J., & Duarte, J. (2013). Tools for evaluating the sustainability of urban design: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Urban Design and Planning, 166(6), 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, R., Pykett, J., & Whitehead, M. (2010). Governing temptation: Changing behaviour in an age of libertarian paternalism. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaatz, E., Root, D., Bowen, P., & Hill, R. (2006). Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment. Building Research & Information, 34(4), 308–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michl, P., Lorenz, D., Lützkendorf, T. & Sayce, S. (2016). Reflecting sustainability in property valuation – a progress report. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 34(6), 552–577. [Accessed 25 February 2018].Google Scholar
  13. Newport, D., Chesnes, T., & Lindner, A. (2003). The “environmental sustainability” problem. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parker, J. (2012). The value of BREEAM. Bracknell: BSRIA.Google Scholar
  15. Parkin, S., Sommer, F., & Uren, S. (2003). Sustainable development: Understanding the concept and practical challenge. Engineering Sustainability, 156(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitt, M., Tucker, M., Riley, M., & Longden, J. (2009). Towards sustainable construction: Promotion and best practices. Construction Innovation, 9(2), 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed, W., & Gordon, E. (2000). Integrated design and building process: What research and methodologies are needed? Building Research & Information, 28(5–6), 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Santillo, D. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research—International, 14(1), 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shove, E. (2002). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, T. (2015). Assessing carbon emissions in BREEAM. Watford: BRE Global.Google Scholar
  22. Vallance, S., Perkins, H., & Dixon, J. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). A framework of sustainable behaviours that can be enabled through the design of neighbourhood-scale developments. Sustainable Development, 15(3), 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. (2014). Green building research—Current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Architecture and Built Environment Research (CABER), Faculty of Environment and TechnologyUniversity of the West of England (UWE)BristolUK

Personalised recommendations