Dimensions of Agility Capabilities Organizational Competitiveness in Sustaining

  • Asma Y. Zainal
  • Hana Yousuf
  • Said A. SalloumEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1153)


The uncertain global changes in the market industry that can unfold potential opportunities and risk it became vital for organizations to be agile to sustain its market position and be able to face challenges and maintain the success journey ultimately. Accordingly, it’s essential to explore organizational agility capabilities as enablers to maintain organizational competitiveness. Flexibility, learning, speed, innovation, and strategy were addressed as the primary organizational capabilities to be considered for successful sustainable organizational competitiveness. The paper also identified relevant theoretical framework linked to the address capability including Organizational Change Theory by Lewin, Organizational Change Model by Kotter, Organizational Learning Theory by Oslen & March and Theory of Dynamic Capabilities by Teece was it discussed how those capabilities are linked. Moreover, the paper addressed a case study on the impact of Deep Learning on Organizational Agility Lastly; the paper is concluded by the illustration of findings, gaps, and suggestions for future research.


Organizational agility Organizational capabilities Competitiveness Organizational sustainability Agility capabilities Deep learning 


  1. 1.
    Pantouvakis, A., Bouranta, N.: Agility, organisational learning culture and relationship quality in the port sector. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 28(3–4), 366–378 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eltawy, N., Gallear, D.: Leanness and agility: a comparative theoretical view. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117(1), 149–165 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pantouvakis, A., Dimas, A.: The role of corporate agility and perceived price on the service quality–customer satisfaction link: some preliminary evidence from the port industry. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 5(4–5), 412–431 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prince, J., Kay, J.M.: Combining lean and agile characteristics: creation of virtual groups by enhanced production flow analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 85(3), 305–318 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Appelbaum, S.H., Calla, R., Desautels, D., Hasan, L.: The challenges of organizational agility (Part 1). Ind. Commer. Train. 49(1), 6–14 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kidd, P.T.: Agile manufacturing: a strategy for the 21st century (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christopher, M.: The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 29(1), 37–44 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stigler, G.: Production and distribution in the short run. J. Polit. Econ. 47(3), 305–327 (1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teece, D., Peteraf, M., Leih, S.: Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. Calif. Manage. Rev. 58(4), 13–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., O’Loughlin, A.: Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: a structured literature review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 19(4), 379–407 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernardes, E.S., Hanna, M.D.: A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature: toward a conceptual definition of customer responsiveness. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 29(1), 30–53 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Backhouse, C.J., Burns, N.D.: Agile value chains for manufacturing–implications for performance measures. Int. J. Agil. Manag. Syst. 1(2), 76–82 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flynn, B.B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R.G., Bates, K.A., Flynn, E.J.: Empirical research methods in operations management. J. Oper. Manag. 9(2), 250–284 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marlow, P.B., Casaca, A.C.P.: Measuring lean ports performance. Int. J. Transp. Manag. 1(4), 189–202 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katayama, H., Bennett, D.: Agility, adaptability and leanness: a comparison of concepts and a study of practice. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 60, 43–51 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeRue, D.S., Ashford, S.J., Myers, C.G.: Learning agility: in search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 5(3), 258–279 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arun, N., Coyle, P.T., Hauenstein, N.: Learning agility: still searching for clarity on a confounded construct. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 5(3), 290–293 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharp, J.M., Irani, Z., Desai, S.: Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62(1–2), 155–169 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alavi, S., Abd. Wahab, D., Muhamad, N., Arbab Shirani, B.: Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(21), 6273–6295 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pereira, V., Mellahi, K., Temouri, Y., Patnaik, S., Roohanifar, M.: Investigating dynamic capabilities, agility and knowledge management within EMNEs-longitudinal evidence from Europe. J. Knowl. Manag. 23, 1708–1728 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park, Y., El Sawy, O.A., Fiss, P.: The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: a configurational approach. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 18(9), 1 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carmeli, A., Dothan, A.: Generative work relationships as a source of direct and indirect learning from experiences of failure: implications for innovation agility and product innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 119, 27–38 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Battistella, C., De Toni, A.F., De Zan, G., Pessot, E.: Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities: a multiple case study. J. Bus. Res. 73, 65–82 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kosonen, M., Doz, Y.: Fast Strategy: How Strategic Agility Will Help You Stay Ahead of the Game. Pearson Education, London (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alon, I., Madanoglu, M., Shoham, A.: Strategic agility explanations for managing franchising expansion during economic cycles. Compet. Rev. Int. Bus. J. 27(2), 113–131 (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    e Cunha, M.P., Gomes, E., Mellahi, K., Miner, A.S., Rego, A.: Strategic agility through improvisational capabilities: implications for a paradox-sensitive HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 30(1), 100695 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Porter, M.E.: Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 19(1–2), 85–90 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grant, R.M.: Porter’s ‘competitive advantage of nations’: an assessment. Strateg. Manag. J. 12(7), 535–548 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dobbin, F., Baum, J.A.C.: Introduction: economics meets sociology in strategic management. In: Baum, J., Dobbin, F. (eds.) Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, pp. 1–26. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oliver, C.: Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(9), 697–713 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shirey, M.R.: Lewin’s theory of planned change as a strategic resource. JONA J. Nurs. Adm. 43(2), 69–72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Coghlan, D., Brannick, T.: Kurt Lewin: the “practical theorist” for the 21st century. Irish J. Manag. 24(2), 31 (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Appelbaum, S.H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.-L., Shafiq, H.: Back to the future: revisiting Kotter’s 1996 change model. J. Manag. Dev. 31(8), 764–782 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 3(2), 147–171 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mouritsen, J.: Rationality, institutions and decision making: reflections on March and Olsen’s rediscovering institutions. Account. Organ. Soc. 19(2), 193–211 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Teece, D.J.: A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 45(1), 8–37 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. J. Manag. Organ. 24(3), 359–368 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    van de Wetering, R., Mikalef, P., Helms, R.: Driving organizational sustainability-oriented innovation capabilities: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 28, 71–79 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pérez-Moreno, S., Rodríguez, B., Luque, M.: Assessing global competitiveness under multi-criteria perspective. Econ. Model. 53, 398–408 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Our Mission, World Economic Forum.
  42. 42.
    Biermann, F., Kanie, N., Kim, R.E.: Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26, 26–31 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., Salloum, S.A.: An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: an integrated model. Educ. Inf. Technol. 1–20 (2020)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Alhashmi, S.F.S., Salloum, S.A., Mhamdi, C.: Implementing artificial intelligence in the United Arab Emirates healthcare sector: an extended technology acceptance model. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 3(3), 27–42 (2019)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alghizzawi, M., Habes, M., Salloum, S.A., Ghani, M.A., Mhamdi, C., Shaalan, K.: The effect of social media usage on students’ e-learning acceptance in higher education: a case study from the United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 3(3), 13–26 (2019)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alomari, K.M., AlHamad, A.Q., Salloum, S.: Prediction of the digital game rating systems based on the ESRB. Opción 35(19), 1368–1393 (2019)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Salloum, S.A., Alhamad, A.Q.M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A.A., Shaalan, K.: Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access 7, 128445–128462 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Alhashmi, S.F.S., Salloum, S.A., Abdallah, S.: Critical success factors for implementing artificial intelligence (AI) projects in Dubai Government United Arab Emirates (UAE) health sector: applying the extended technology acceptance model (TAM). In: International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, pp. 393–405 (2019)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang, H., Huang, J., Zhang, Z.: The Impact of Deep Learning on Organizational Agility (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business ManagementThe British University in DubaiDubaiUAE
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering & ITThe British University in DubaiDubaiUAE
  3. 3.Machine Learning and NLP Research Group, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of SharjahSharjahUAE

Personalised recommendations