Advertisement

Animal Experimentation in Biomedical Science

  • Sana Loue
Chapter
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Animals have been used in research since the third century B.C. There exists disagreement among both scientists and the public at large regarding the necessity of conducting research with animals. This chapter provides a review of religious views toward the use of animals in biomedical research and explores the extent to which such views are congruent—or not—with secular views and current practices relating to the use of animals in research. The use of animals for research related to consumer products such as pesticides, cosmetics, or other substances is beyond the scope of this chapter. Three components of animal research are considered: the ethics of control, the ethics of animal suffering, and the ethics of killing. The chapter focuses on the three Abrahamic faiths of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and, where possible and relevant, provides a comparison with the views and practices in non-US locales.

Keywords

Animals Animal experimentation Institutional animal care and use committee Religion Speciesism 

References

  1. Abdoul-Rouf, H. (2010). Schools of Qur’anic exegesis: Genesis and development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association Committee on Research and Ethics. (2012). Guidelines for the ethical conduct in the care and use of nonhuman animals in research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. American Veterinary Medical Association. (2013). AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2013 edition. Schaumburg, IL: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Anon. (2006). An open debate. Nature, 444, 789–790. https://www.nature.com/articles/444789b. Accessed 23 May 2019Google Scholar
  5. Anon. (2012). Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Animal Behaviour, 83, 301–309.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, M. R. (2019). Opinion: Cutting animal research would hurt humans. Detroit News, April 11.Google Scholar
  7. Bentham, J. (1970[1789]). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart (Eds.), The collected works of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bleich, D. J. (1986). Judaism and animal experimentation. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 61–114). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bowd, A. D., & Bowd, A. C. (1989). Attitudes towards the treatment of animals: A study of Christian groups in Australia. Anthrozoös, 3, 20–24.Google Scholar
  10. Broida, J., Tingley, L., Kimball, R., & Miele, J. (1993). Personality differences between pro- and anti-vivisectionists. Society and Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 1(2), 129–144.Google Scholar
  11. Buckmaster, C. (2019). Research organizations should start sharing with the public information, stories, photos, and videos on how animals are cared for and used in science. The Scientist, April 11.Google Scholar
  12. Chapple, C. (1986). Noninjury to animals: Jain and Buddhist perspectives. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 213–235). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coogan, M. D. (Ed.). (2007). The new Oxford annotated bible, new revised standard edition (augmented 3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cordovero, M. (1974). The palm tree of Deborah (L. Jacobs, trans). New York: Sepher-Hermon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Darwin, C. (1964 [1859]). The origin of the species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. DeLeeuw, J. L., Galen, L. W., Aebersold, C., & Stanton, V. (2007). Support for animal rights as a function of belief in evolution, religious fundamentalism, and religious denomination. Society and Animals, 15, 353–363.Google Scholar
  17. Drolet, R. M., & Savard, J. P. L. (2006). Effects of backpack radio-transmitters on female Barrow’s goldeneyes. Waterbirds, 29, 115–120.Google Scholar
  18. Eldridge, J. J., & Gluck, J. P. (1996). Gender differences in attitudes toward animal research. Ethics & Behavior, 6, 239–256.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, M. P. (1904). The criminal prosecution and capital punishment of animals. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
  20. Farrell, P. (2016). U.S. Animal Research Center needs more oversight, audit says. New York Times, December 20.Google Scholar
  21. Ferdowsian, H. R., & Beck, N. (2011). Ethical and scientific considerations regarding animal testing and research. PLoS One, 6(9), e24059.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Francione, G. L. (2000). Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog? Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, R. G. (1997). Moral community and animal research in medicine. Ethics & Behavior, 7(2), 123–136.Google Scholar
  24. Furnham, A., & Pinder, A. (1990). Young people’s attitudes to experimentation on animals. The Psychologist, 10, 444–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaffney, J. (1986). The relevance of human experimentation to Roman Catholic ethical methodology. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 149–170). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Garber, K. (2006). Realistic rodents? Debate grows over new mouse models of cancer. Journal of the National Institute of Cancer, 98, 1176–1178.Google Scholar
  27. Gilmour, M. J. (2015). C.S. Lewis and animal experimentation. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 67(4), 254–262.Google Scholar
  28. Hackam, D. G., & Redelmeier, D. A. (2006). Translation of the research evidence from animals to humans. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1731–1732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hagelin, J., Carlsson, H.-E., & Hau, J. (2003). An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 67–81.Google Scholar
  30. Holmberg, T. (2011). Mortal love: Care practices in animal experimentation. Feminist Theory, 12(2), 147–163.Google Scholar
  31. Ibrahim, D. (2006). Reduce, refine, replace: The failure of the three Rs and the future of animal experimentation. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(7). http://www.chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2006/iss1/7. Accessed 22 May 2019
  32. John Paul II. (1985, July 17). Science, religion, society. In Vatican observatory. http://www.vaticanobservatory.va/content/specolavaticana/en/science%2D%2Dreligion%2D%2Dsociety.html. Accessed 03 May 2019.
  33. John Paul II. (2000). Address to scientists, Jubilee of Scientists, May 25. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2000/apr-jun/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20000525_jubilee-science.html. Accessed 03 May 2019.
  34. John Paul II. (2003). Address of John Paul II to members of the Pontifical Academy of Science, November 10. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2003/november/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20031110_academy-sciences.html. Accessed 03 May 2019.
  35. Kalechofsky, R. (1992). Jewish law and tradition on animal rights: A usable paradigm for the animal rights movement. In R. Kalechofsky (Ed.), Judaism and animal rights: Classical and contemporary responses (pp. 46–55). Marblehead, MA: Micah Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Knapp, C. R., & Abarca, J. G. (2009). Effect of radio transmitter burdening on locomotor ability and survival of iguana hatchlings. Herpetologica, 65, 363–372.Google Scholar
  37. Knight, A. (2008). The beginning of the end for chimpanzee experiments? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 3(16).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-3-16
  38. Lal, B. K. (1986). Hindu perspectives on the use of animals in science. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 199–212). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Linzey, A. (1986). The place of animals in creation: A Christian view. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 115–148). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Linzey, A., & Linzey, C. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of practical animal ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Maimonides, M. (1956 [1204]). Guide of the perplexed, book III (M. Friedländer, trans). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Mascall, E. L. (1962). Sonship and sacrifice. Canadian Journal of Theology, 8(2), 88–101.Google Scholar
  43. Masri, A.-H. B. A. (1986). Animal experimentation: The Muslim viewpoint. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 171–197). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Masure, E. (1944). The Christian sacrifice (I. Trethowne, Trans.). London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
  45. Mejia, M. P. (2007). Gender jihad: Muslim women, Islamic jurisprudence, and women’s rights. Kritikē, 1(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  46. Metz, T. (2010). An African theory of bioethics: Reply to MacPherson and Macklin. Developing World Bioethics, 10(3), 158–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mika, M. (2006). Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights movement. Social Forces, 85(2), 915–941.Google Scholar
  48. Mobasher, M., Aramesh, K., Aldavoud, S. J., Ashrafganjooei, N., Divsalar, K., Phillips, C. J. C., et al. (2008). Proposing a national ethical framework for animal research in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health: A Supplementary Issue on Bioethics, 37(1), 39–46.Google Scholar
  49. Montefiore, H. (1970). Can man survive? (the question mark and other essays). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  50. National Academy of Sciences. (2004). Science, medicine, and animals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  51. National Research Council. (2011). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (8th ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  52. Newer, R. (2019, April 1). This tarantula became a scientific celebrity. Was it poached from the wild? New York Times.Google Scholar
  53. Orlans, F. B. (2001). History and ethical regulation of animal experimentation: An international perspective. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), Companion to bioethics (pp. 399–410). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Parker, J. (1993). With new eyes: The animal rights movement and religion. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 36(3), 338–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Paul, E. F. (2002). Why animal experimentation matters. Society, 39, 7–15.Google Scholar
  56. Pifer, L., Shimizu, K., & Pifer, R. (1994). Public attitudes toward animal research: Some international comparisons. Society and Animals, 2(2), 95–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ratankul, P. (2004). The Buddhist concept of life, suffering and death, and related bioethical issues. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 14, 141–146.Google Scholar
  58. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  59. Regan, T. (1997). The rights of humans and other animals. Ethics & Behavior, 7(2), 103–111.Google Scholar
  60. Remele, K. (2018). Killing animals—Permitted by God? The role of Christian ethics (in not) protecting the lives of animals. In A. Linzey & C. Linzey (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of practical animal ethics (pp. 315–332). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Rice, M. J. (2011). The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: The result is more animal-based research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6(12). http://www.ped-med.com/content/6/1/12
  62. Rollin, B. E. (2006). The regulation of animal research and the emergence of animal ethics: A conceptual history. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27, 285–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rusche, B. (2003). The three Rs and animal welfare: Conflict or way forward? Alternatives to Animal Experimentation (ALTEX), 20, 63–76.Google Scholar
  64. Russow, L.-M. (1999). Bioethics, animal research, and ethical theory. ILAR (Institute for Laboratory Animal Research) Journal, 40(1), 15–21.Google Scholar
  65. Shomali, M. (2008). Islamic bioethics: A general scheme. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 1, 1–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  67. Singer, P. (1980). Animals and the value of life. In T. L. Beauchamp & T. Regan (Eds.), Matters of life and death: New introductory essays in moral philosophy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Singer, P. (2001, February 9). Talking taboo with Peter Singer. Peter Singer interviewed by Rachael Kohn, ABC. https://www.utilitarian.net/singer/interviews-debates/20010209.htm. Accessed 17 May 2019.
  69. Smith, D. H. (1997). Religion and the use of animals in research: Some first thoughts. Ethics & Behavior, 7(2), 137–147.Google Scholar
  70. Straight, W. (1962). Man’s debt to laboratory animals. Miami University Medical School Bulletin, 16, 106.Google Scholar
  71. Straus, M. (2018). Americans are divided over the use of animals in research. Pew Research Center FactTank: News in the numbers, August 16. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/16/americans-are-divided-over-the-use-of-animals-in-scientific-research/. Accessed 02 May 2019.
  72. Tappan, R. (2017). Islamic bioethics and animal research: The case of Iran. Journal of Religious Ethics, 45(3), 562–578.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, K., Gordon, N., Langley, G., & Higgins, W. (2008). Estimates of worldwide laboratory animal use in 2005. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 36(3), 327–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Taylor, R. L. (1986). Of animals and man: The Confucian perspective. In T. Regan (Ed.), Animal sacrifices (pp. 237–262). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tlili, S. (2012). Animals in the Qur’an. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. United States Agency for International Development. (n.d.). Mobilizing Muslim religious leaders for reproductive health and family planning at the community level: A training manual. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  77. United States Catholic Conference. (2013). Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  78. Yarri, D. (2005). The ethics of animal experimentation: A critical analysis and constructive Christian proposal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Legal References

    Statutes

    1. Animal Welfare Act, Pub. L. No, 89-544, 80 Stat. 350, 7 U.S.C. § 2131 et seq.Google Scholar
    2. Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-171, 116 Stat. 134-116 Stat. 540.Google Scholar
    3. Health Research Extension Act of 1985, Pub. L. No. 99-158.Google Scholar
    4. Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-544, 80 Stat. 350, 7 U.S.C. § 2131 et seq.Google Scholar

    Regulations

    1. Code of Federal Regulations, tit. 9 §§ 2.31-2.36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sana Loue
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Medicine, Department of BioethicsCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations