Advertisement

An Integrated Approach to Solve Small Farm Holder’s Mechanization Barriers in Ethiopia

  • Dessie Tarekegn BantelayEmail author
  • Tsehaye Dedimas
  • Nigist Kelemu
Conference paper
  • 36 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 308)

Abstract

Ethiopia has a long history of agricultural practices. But the deployment of agricultural mechanization is still minimal. Farm power is largely dependent on human muscle and oxen driven traditional farm techniques. Even though the effort and interest of agricultural mechanization grew from time to time yet it is not effective due to poor deployment strategy. The main objective of this study was to review and assess the effectiveness of the existing agro-machinery manufacturing, distribution and use in Amhara region of Ethiopia; identify the barriers of agro-machinery deployment actions and design an effective deployment model. The study carried out through collecting and analysis of secondary data related to past attempts followed by. Then primary data gathered and analyzed from the target audience using survey questionnaire, focused group discussion and interview. The study result reveals that poor agricultural mechanization in the region basically associated with inadequate infrastructure, lack of financing institute, fragmented lands, working culture and related ones. In addition there is no clear, adequate and comprehensive agricultural mechanization deployment model. The level of these problems were analyzed quantitatively. Then agricultural mechanization deployment model has been designed. The model offers particular responsibilities for each deployment tasks and protect overlap of responsibilities, remove task redundancy and trace out failure easily.

Keywords

Agricultural mechanization Mechanization barriers Mechanization deployment model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This survey was performed by the support of ASMIC BiT. The authors would like to thank all participants included in the survey for their kind cooperation and comments. The authors furthermore wish to acknowledge Dr. Sisay Geremew, ASMIC BiT coordinator, for his particular contribution in the survey.

References

  1. 1.
    UNDP strengthening national capacity through sustainable increases in agricultural production and productivity, March 2011–June 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cervantes-Godoy, D., Dewbre, J.: Economic importance of agriculture for poverty reduction. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 23, OECD Publishing (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Josef, K., John, E., Brian, G.: Mechanization for rural development: a review of patterns and progress from around the world. Integrated Crop Management, vol. 20 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brian, S., Martin, H., Josef, K.: Agricultural mechanization a key input for sub-Saharan African smallholders. Integrated Crop Management, vol. 23 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh, G., Zhao, B.: Agricultural mechanization situation in Asia and the Pacific region. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am. 47, 15–25 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    FAO: Farm power and mechanization for small farms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural and Food Engineering Services Technical Report 3, Rome, Italy, p. 65 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mrema, G.: The process of developing a draft framework for SAMS for the transformation of agriculture in Africa: sending the hand-hoe to the museum. In: Proceedings of the Consultative Meeting on Mechanization Strategy: New Models for Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization in Sub Saharan Africa, Nairobi, Kenya, 1–3 December 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Eerdewijk, A., Danielsen, K.: Gender matters in farm power. KIT, CIMMYT, CGIAR (2015). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282976045. Gender Matters in Farm Power
  9. 9.
    Mehta, C.R., Chande, N.S., Senthilkumar, T.: Status, challenges and strategies for farm mechanization in India. Ama Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am. 45(4), 43–50 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fatunbi, A.O., Odogola, R.W.: Status of smallholders agricultural mechanization in Sub-Saharan Africa. FARA Res. Rep. 2(10), 27 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dagnaw, Y.T.: Critical factors hampering agricultural productivity in ethiopia: the case of northern ethiopian farmers. In: International Conference on African Development Archives, Paper 123 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GoE: The Agricultural Development Led Industrialization (ADLI) strategy of Ethiopia. Government of Ethiopia (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassan, O., Abdulle, A.: Lack of infrastructure: the impact on economic development as a case of Benadir region and Hir-shabelle, Somalia. Dev. Country Stud. 7(1) (2017). 2225-0565Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andersen, P., Shimokowa, S.: Rural infrastructure and agricultural development. Paper Presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Tokyo, Japan, 29–30 May (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hilmi, M.: Hire services as a business. Agric. Dev. 19, 21–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sims, B., Thierfelder, C., Kienzle, J., Friedrich, T., Kassam, A.: Development of the conservation agricultural equipment industry in sub-Saharan Africa. FAO (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sims, B., Kienzle, J., FAO: Farm equipment supply chains. Guidelines for policy-makers and service providers: experiences from Kenya, Pakistan and Brazil. Agricultural and Food Engineering Technical Report 7, Rome, Italy (2009). 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ashburner, J.E., Kienzle, J. (eds.), FAO: Investment in agricultural mechanization in Africa: conclusions and recommendations of a round table meeting of experts. Agricultural and Food Engineering Technical Report 8, Rome, Italy (2011). 76 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moon, M.: Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: motivation, organizational culture, sector and managerial level. Public Perform. Manage. Rev. 24(2), 177–194 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Houmy, K., Clarke, L.J., Ashburner, J.E., Kienzle, J., FAO: Agricultural mechanization in sub-Saharan Africa: guidelines for preparing a strategy. Integrated crop management, Rome, Italy, vol. 22, pp. 1–92 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sims, B., Kienzle, J.: Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environments 3, 11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dessie Tarekegn Bantelay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tsehaye Dedimas
    • 1
  • Nigist Kelemu
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of TechnologyBahir Dar UniversityBahir DarEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Marketing Management, College of Business and EconomicsBahir Dar UniversityBahir DarEthiopia

Personalised recommendations