Advertisement

Bridging DH and Humanistic HCI

  • John S. SebergerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 211 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

Bowker’s Age of Potential Memory describes a new era characterized by a culture of knowledge production that fosters and stifles certain forms of statements depending on the logics that subtend them. Through processes of ubiquitous data collection, analysis, and feedback, individuals are increasingly reduced to users; users are re-created as data doubles or data doppelgangers, post hoc, through the aggregation and analysis of their data traces. This discursive transformation of the human that will arise in relation to living alongside and through these doubles or doppelgangers is difficult to understand within the framework of extant disciplinary silos. And yet methods that connect disciplines are emerging. To realize these connections, translational work is required. This paper explores the complementarity of digital humanities (DH) and humanistic human-computer interaction (hHCI) through the lens of distant reading. I focus on distant reading—topic modelling in particular—because of its methodological popularity and relation to discourse. I argue that distant reading comprises a useful connection between these two young domains: a pivot that allows for the inter- or transdisciplinary study of the future human through the analysis of its potential sociotechnical, discursive compositions.

Keywords

Digital humanities Humanistic HCI Discourse Distant reading Sociotechnical 

References

  1. 1.
    Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Humanistic HCI. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lupton, D.: Digital Sociology. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., Taylor, T.L.: Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vertesi, J., Ribes, D.: digitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ribes, D., Hoffman, A.S., Slota, S.C., Bowker, G.C.: The logic of domains. Soc. Stud. Sci. 49, 281–309 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719849709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward and ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111–134 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265, 94–104 (1991).  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foucault, M.: The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becher, T., Trowler, P.: Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline. Open University Press, Philadelphia (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serres, M.: The Parasite. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowker, G.C.: Memory Practices in the Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, New York (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latour, B.: Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern | bruno-latour.fr. In: Brown, B. (ed.) Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dawkins, R.: Gaps in the Mind. In: The Great Ape Project, pp. 80–87 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snow, C.P.: The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., DiSalvo, C., Gaver, W., Sengers, P.: The humanities and/in HCI. In: CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1135–1138. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moretti, F.: Distant Reading. Verso, London (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moretti, F.: Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, London (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seberger, J.S.: Becoming Objects: IoT, The Archive, and the Future of the Human (2019)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tavory, I., Timmermans, S.: Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Derrida, J.: Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Venturini, T.: Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Underst. Sci. 21, 796–812 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heidegger, M.: Being and Time. Harper, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flusser, V.: On Doubt. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Von Uexküll, J.: A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89, 319–391 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1992.89.4.319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heidegger, M.: What is a thing? H. Regnery Co., Chicago (1968)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gitelman, L. (ed.): “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. The MIT Press, Cambridge; London (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gitelman, L.: Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Duke University Press, Durham (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Drucker, J.: Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Foucault, M.: Governmentality. In: Burchell, G., Gordon, C., Miller, P. (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Foucault, M.: The Birth of the Clinic. Routledge, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boullier, D.: The social science and the traces of big data: society, opinion, or vibrations? Revue francaise de science politique (Engl. Ed.) 65, 71–93 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harman, G.: Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin, London (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P.: The three paradigms of HCI. In: Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 1–18 (2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dennett, D.C.: Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bermudez, J.L.: Philosophy of Psychology: Contemporary Readings. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Jr.: Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods (2002)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., Kaye, J.J.: Reflective design. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, pp. 49–58. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Binder, T., Michelis, G.D., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., Wagner, I.: Design Things. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Woolgar, S.: Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol. Rev. 38, 58–99 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., Schnapp, J.: Digital Humanities. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gold, M.K.: Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jones, S.E.: The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. Routledge, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kirschenbaum, M.: Digital humanities as/is a tactical term. In: Debates in the Digital Humanities, pp. 415–428. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2012)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kirschenbaum, M.: What is “digital humanities”, and why are they saying such terrible things about it? Differences 25, 46–63 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2419997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu, A.: Digital humanities and academic change. Engl. Lang. Notes 47, 17–35 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pannapacker, W.: “Big Tent Digital Humanities,” a View From the Edge, Part 1 (2011). http://chronicle.com/article/Big-Tent-Digital-Humanities/128434/
  53. 53.
    Porsdam, H.: Digital humanities: on finding the proper balance between qualitative and quantitative ways of doing research in the humanities. Digit. Humanit. Q. 7 (2013). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/3/000167/000167.html
  54. 54.
    Raley, R.: Digital humanities for the next five minutes. Differences 25, 26–45 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2419991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ramsay, S.: On building. In: Terras, M., Nyhan, J., Vanhoutte, E. (eds.) Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Routledge, Abingdon (2011)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Seberger, J.S.: How long is now? The “digital” in DH. Presented at the DH 2015, Paramatta, NSW (2015)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
  58. 58.
    Meeks, E., Weingart, S.: The Digital Humanities Contribution to Topic Modeling. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/dh-contribution-to-topic-modeling/
  59. 59.
  60. 60.
    Weingart, S.: Topic Modeling for Humanists: A Guided Tour. http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=19113
  61. 61.
    Anderson, C.: The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete (2008). https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
  62. 62.
    Bowker, G.C.: The theory/data thing. Int. J. Commun. 8, 1795–1799 (2014)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fitzpatrick, K.: Planned Obsolescence. NYU Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Cetina, K.K.: Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Olsen, M.: Signs, symbols and discourses: a new direction for computer-aided literature studies. Comput. Humanit. 27, 309–314 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Underwood, T.: What kinds of “topics” does topic modeling actually produce? (2012). https://tedunderwood.com/2012/04/01/what-kinds-of-topics-does-topic-modeling-actually-produce/
  68. 68.
    Bowker, G.C.: Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Day, R.E.: Indexing It All: The Subject in the Age of Documentation, Information, and Data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rogers, R.: Digital Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nora, P.: L’événement monstre. Communications 18, 162–172 (1972).  https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1972.1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Croce, B.: History. Its Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace (1921)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35, 601–617 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Røssaak, E.: The Archive in Motion: New Conceptions of the Archive in Contemporary Thought and New Media Practices. Novus Press, Oslo (2010)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shaviro, S.: The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism (Posthumanities). Lulu Press Inc, Morrisville (2016)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15, 662–679 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    McCallum, A.K.: MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations