Advertisement

Ranking-Based Cited Text Identification with Highway Networks

  • Shiyan OuEmail author
  • Hyonil Kim
Conference paper
  • 174 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

In recent years, content-based citation analysis (CCA) has attracted great attention, which focuses on citation texts within full-text scientific articles to analyze the meaning of each citation. However, citation texts often lack the appropriate evidence and context from cited papers and are sometimes even inaccurate. Thus it is necessary to identify the corresponding cited text from a cited paper and examine which part of the content of the paper was cited in a citation. In this study, we proposed a novel ranking-based method to identify cited texts. This method contains two stages: similarity-based unsupervised ranking and deep learning-based supervised ranking. A novel listwise ranking model was developed with the use of 36 similarity features and 11 section position features. Firstly, top-5 sentences were selected for each citation text according to a modified Jaccard similarity metric. Then the selected sentences were ranked using the trained listwise ranking model, and top-2 sentences were selected as cited sentences. The experiments showed that the proposed method outperformed other classification-based and voting-based identification methods on the test set of the CL-SciSumm 2017.

Keywords

Content-based citation analysis Cited text identification Listwise ranking Text similarity Deep learning 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper is one of the research outputs of the project supported by the State Key Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17ATQ001).

References

  1. 1.
    Ding, Y., Zhang, G., Chambers, T., Song, M., Wang, X., Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis: the next generation of citation analysis. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(9), 1820–1833 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohan, A., Goharian, N.: Scientific document summarization via citation contextualization and scientific discourse. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 19(2-3), 287–303 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-017-0216-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaidka, K., Chandrasekaran, M.K., Rustagi, S., Kan, M.-Y.: Insights from CL-SciSumm 2016: the faceted scientific document summarization Shared Task. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 19(2), 163–171 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-017-0221-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma, S., Xu, J., Zhang, C.: Automatic identification of cited text spans: a multi-classifier approach over imbalanced dataset. Scientometrics 116(2), 1303–1330 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2754-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeh, J.Y., Hsu, T.Y., Tsai, C.J., et al.: On identifying cited texts for citances and classifying their discourse facets by classification techniques. J. Inf. Sci. Eng. 35(1), 61–86 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pramanick, A., Mandi, S., Dey, M., Das, D.: Employing word vectors for identifying, classifying and summarizing scientific documents. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Computational Linguistics Scientific Summarization on Shared Task (CL-SciSumm 2017), pp. 94–98. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jaidka, K., Chandrasekaran, K.M., Jain, D., Kan, M-Y.: The CL-SciSumm shared task 2017: results and key insights. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Computational Linguistics Scientific Summarization on Shared Task (CL-SciSumm 2017), pp. 1–15. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ou, S.Y., Kim, H.I.: Unsupervised citation sentence identification based on similarity measurement. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds.) iConference 2018. LNCS, vol. 10766, pp. 384–394. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao, Z., Qin, T., Liu, T.Y., Tsai, M.F., Li, H.: Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine learning, pp. 129–136. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srivastava, R.K., Greff, K., Schmidhuber, J.: Training very deep networks. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015 (NIPS 2015), pp. 2377–2385. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NIPS), California (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felber, T., Kern, R.: Query generation strategies for CL-SciSumm 2017 shared task. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Computational Linguistics Scientific Summarization on Shared Task (CL-SciSumm 2017), pp. 67–72. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, L., Zhang, Y., Mao, L., Chi, J., Chen, M., Huang, Z.: CIST@CLSciSumm-17: multiple features based citation linkage, classification and summarization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Computational Linguistics Scientific Summarization on Shared Task (CL-SciSumm 2017), pp. 43–54. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, C.Y.: ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out (Post-Conference Workshop of ACL 2004), pp. 74–81. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information ManagementNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations