Advertisement

User Experience to Inform the Design of a Search Infrastructure for Open Educational Resources

  • Tamara HeckEmail author
  • Valentyna Kovalenko
  • Marc Rittberger
Conference paper
  • 215 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

Open education includes the access and use of freely licensed material, which is known as open educational resources. Since the idea evolved about 20 years ago, the movement faces the challenge to motivate educators to actively use, create and distribute open learning resources. The reasons are that educators do not know where to find such resources for their discipline, and if they know common web sources, they find it hard to seek for the most relevant material. By now, there are several information seeking services for openly licensed educational material that differ in structure and functions in many respects. Some services as well offer functions to upload one’s own material. A challenge for those services is to offer appropriate seeking and filtering functions to allow users an efficient and easy search. The following paper reports on a user-oriented study that evaluates six search services for open educational resources. A qualitative approach was chosen to better study the specific target group and new evolving search services. The study informs the designing of a decentralized infrastructure that offers seeking educational material from different higher educational institutions within Germany.

Keywords

Information seeking User experience Open educational resources 

References

  1. 1.
    UNESCO: Paris open declaration. Paper presented at the World Open Educational Resources (OER) Congress, Paris, France (2012). http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/Paris%20OER%20Declaration_01.pdf
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Wiley, D.: The Access Compromise and the 5th R (2014). https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
  4. 4.
    Heck, T., et al.: Survey: open science in higher education (2017). https://zenodo.org/record/400561/files/TIB_OS_wiss_Poster_3_2017_RZ.PDF
  5. 5.
    Allen, E., Seaman, J.: Opening the textbook. Educational resources in U.S. higher education (2017). http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthetextbook2017.pdf
  6. 6.
    Santos-Hermosa, G., Ferran-Ferrer, N., Abadal, E.: Repositories of open educational resources. An assessment of reuse and educational aspects. IRRODL 18, 84+ (2017).  https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3063
  7. 7.
    Zervas, P., Alifragkis, C., Sampson, D.G.: A quantitative analysis of learning object repositories as knowledge management systems. Knowl. Manag. E-Learn. Int. J. 6, 156–170 (2014). http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/download/240/241Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerres, M., Hölterhof, T., Scharnberg, G., Schröder, N.: EduArc. Eine Infrastruktur zur hochschulübergreifenden Nachnutzung digitaler Lernmaterialien. Synergie 07 (2019). https://uhh.de/en4om
  9. 9.
    Heinen, R., Kerres, M., Scharnberg, G., Blees, I., Rittberger, M.: A federated reference structure for open informational ecosystems. JIME 2016, 33 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bossu, C., Brown, M., Bull, D.: Adoption, use and management of open educational resources to enhance teaching and learning in Australia: final report to the office for learning & teaching (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boston Consulting Group: The Open Education Resources Ecosystem: an Evaluation of the OER Movement’s Current State and its Progress Toward Mainstream Adoption. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, California (2013). https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/The%20Open%20Educational%20Resources%20Ecosystem.pdfGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schumann, L., Stock, W.G.: The information service evaluation (ISE) model. Webology 11, 1–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rehm, M., Heinen, R., Schanberg, G.: Edutags - social bookmarking for teachers: a German case study (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kerres, M., Heinen, R.: Open informational ecosystems. The missing link for sharing resources for education. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2008
  15. 15.
    Mandausch, M.: Annotationskonzept für Bildungsressourcen (2017). https://www.ice-karlsruhe.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2017-12-01-Annotationskonzept.pdf
  16. 16.
    Stagg, A., Bossu, C.: Educational policy and open educational practice in Australian higher education. In: Blessinger, P., Bliss, T.J. (eds.) Open Education. International Perspectives in Higher Education, pp. 115–135. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge (2016). http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/57224
  17. 17.
    Blessinger, P., Bliss, T.J.: Introduction to open education: towards a human rights theory. In: Blessinger, P., Bliss, T.J. (eds.) Open Education. International Perspectives in Higher Education, pp. 11–29. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge (2016).  https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.1.1.5

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Center for Education, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in EducationFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Darmstadt University of Applied SciencesDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations