Advertisement

Cultural Activity Diversity and Community Characteristics: An Exploratory Study

  • Myeong LeeEmail author
  • Brian S. Butler
Conference paper
  • 203 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

Cultural diversity has been conceptualized and studied in different ways. On the one hand, cultural diversity can be conceptualized based on people’s ethnic and national backgrounds. On the other hand, cultural dimensions are defined depending on people’s behaviors and traits. Sociologists further categorized the latter depending on the degree of typicality in cultural artifacts/activities and individual’s omnivorousness for cultural tastes. Although both aspects of culture-related concepts provide meaningful implications for urban characteristics, it is still unclear how these cultural dimensions are related to other characteristics of urban areas. This paper suggests a concept of cultural activity diversity, the diversity of cultural activities as a whole in a city. We provide an exploratory analysis of the relationships between cultural characteristics and socio-economic features across 14 and 28 urban areas in the U.S, respectively, using local event datasets.

Keywords

Local events Cultural activity diversity Urban characteristics 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study is part of a larger study in the first author’s dissertation work and has been extended from it. The first author’s research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation’s CHS program (#1816763) and through the Ann G. Wylie Dissertation Fellowship from the University of Maryland at College Park. We appreciate their generous support and reviewers’ constructive feedback.

References

  1. 1.
    Abascal, M., Baldassarri, D.: Love thy neighbor? Ethnoracial diversity and trust reexamined. Am. J. Sociol. 121(3), 722–782 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alesina, A., Baqir, R., Hoxby, C.: Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. J. Polit. Econ. 112(2), 348–396 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alesina, A., Ferrara, E.L.: The determinants of trust. Working Paper 7621, National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2000.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w7621, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7621
  4. 4.
    Babacan, H.: Challenges of inclusion: cultural diversity, citizenship and engagement. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Engaging Communities, pp. 1–18. Queensland Department of Main Roads, August 2005Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bail, C.A.: The cultural environment: measuring culture with big data. Theory Soc. 43(3–4), 465–482 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bail, C.A., Brown, T.W., Wimmer, A.: Prestige, proximity, and prejudice: how Google search terms diffuse across the world. Am. J. Sociol. 124(5), 1496–1548 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(Jan), 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costa, D.L., Kahn, M.E.: Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: an economist’s perspective. Perspect. Polit. 1(1), 103–111 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubois, S.: Recognition and renown, the structure of cultural markets: evidence from French poetry. J. Cult. Econ. 36(1), 27–48 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabry, J., Goodrich, B.: rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modeling via Stan. R package version 2.18.2 (2018). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstanarm
  12. 12.
    Gereke, J., Schaub, M., Baldassarri, D.: Ethnic diversity, poverty and social trust in Germany: evidence from a behavioral measure of trust. PLoS ONE 13(7), e0199834 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, vol. 349. University of California Press (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A., Soutter, C.L.: Measuring trust. Q. J. Econ. 115(3), 811–846 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldberg, A., Hannan, M.T., Kovács, B.: What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81(2), 215–241 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M.: Finding scientific topics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101(Suppl. 1), 5228–5235 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hannan, M.T., Carroll, G.R.: Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.: Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirschman, A.O.: The paternity of an index. Am. Econ. Rev. 54(5), 761–762 (1964)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hristova, D., Aiello, L.M., Quercia, D.: The new urban success: how culture pays. Front. Phys. 6 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00027
  22. 22.
    Lee, M., Butler, B.S.: How are information deserts created? A theory of local information landscapes. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70(2), 101–116 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    López, C., Butler, B., Brusilovsky, P.: Does anything ever happen around here? Assessing the online information landscape for local events. J. Urban Technol. 21(4), 95–123 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mazanec, J.A., Crotts, J.C., Gursoy, D., Lu, L.: Homogeneity versus heterogeneity of cultural values: an item-response theoretical approach applying Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in a single nation. Tour. Manag. 48, 299–304 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van der Meer, T., Tolsma, J.: Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40(1), 459–478 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mitchell, B., Franco, J.: HOLC “redlining” maps: the persistent structure of segregation and economic inequality. NCRC Research (2018). https://ncrc.org/holc/
  27. 27.
    Ottaviano, G., Peri, G.: The economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities. J. Econ. Geogr. 6(1), 9–44 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park, M., Park, J., Baek, Y.M., Macy, M.: Cultural values and cross-cultural video consumption on Youtube. PLoS ONE 12(5), e0177865 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park, M., Weber, I., Naaman, M., Vieweg, S.: Understanding musical diversity via online social media. In: Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pedrini, M., Bramanti, V., Cannatelli, B.: The impact of national culture and social capital on corporate social responsibility attitude among immigrants entrepreneurs. J. Manag. Gov. 20(4), 759–787 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peterson, R.A., Kern, R.M.: Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61(5), 900–907 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pettigrew, T.F.: Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49(1), 65–85 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pontikes, E.G., Hannan, M.T.: An ecology of social categories. Sociol. Sci. 1, 311–343 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Putnam, R.D.: E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scand. Polit. Stud. 30(2), 137–174 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rao, C.R.: Diversity: its measurement, decomposition apportionment and analysis. Sankhy: Indian J. Stat. Ser. A 44(1), 1–22 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Risen, T.: Where should you start your tech company?: A new study shows that the best city for tech isn’t necessarily Silicon Valley. U.S. News (2016). https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-11/where-should-you-start-your-tech-company. Accessed 3 May 2019
  37. 37.
    Schaeffer, M.: Can competing diversity indices inform us about why ethnic diversity erodes social cohesion? A test of five diversity indices in Germany. Soc. Sci. Res. 42(3), 755–774 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stirling, A.: A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J. R. Soc. Interface 4(15), 707–719 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stolle, D., Soroka, S., Johnston, R.: When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Polit. Stud. 56(1), 57–75 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., Kuha, J., Jackson, J.: Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethn. Racial Stud. 37(8), 1286–1309 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.831932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Uslaner, E.M.: The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang, P., Lee, M., Meng, X., Butler, B.: Toward an ecology theory of creativity in it products: a study of mobile device industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 1–20 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Sciences and TechnologyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.College of Information StudiesUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations