Reverse Electrodialysis Cells

  • Kjersti W. Krakhella
  • Markus Wahl
  • Eilif S. Øyre
  • Jacob J. LambEmail author
  • Odne S. Burheim


In a closed system, reverse electrodialysis (RED) and electrodialysis (ED) can be coupled into an energy storage system where excess power can be placed in a salinity gradient between two solutions. The device is powered by applying an external power source to force ions from a dilute solution to a concentrated solution through alternating ion exchange membranes. The current is discharged by allowing ions to move from the concentrated solution through the same membranes to dilute solutions, supplying electrical energy at the electrodes. Most literature claims have been developed using open real-world concentration gradients (seawater and freshwater), whereas a closed system may have a higher salt concentration (NaCl up to 6 M). A closed system also benefits from the absence of membrane fouling, and it is simpler to monitor and maintain the temperature. In this chapter, the closed reverse electrodialysis system is discussed.



The authors are grateful to the ENERSENSE programme and NTNU Team Hydrogen at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) for supporting and helping on this book project.


  1. 1.
    Kingsbury RS, Chu K, Coronell O (2015) Energy storage by reversible electrodialysis: the concentration battery. J Memb Sci 495:502–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Egmond WJ, Starke UK, Saakes M, Buisman CJN, Hamelers HVM (2017) Energy efficiency of a concentration gradient flow battery at elevated temperatures. J Power Sources 340:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamcev J, Paul DR, Manning GS, Freeman BD (2018) Ion diffusion coefficients in ion exchange membranes: significance of counterion condensation. Macromolecules 51(15):5519–5529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giorno L, Drioli E, Strathmann H (2016) Water transport in ion-exchange membranes. In: Drioli E, Giorno L (eds) Encyclopedia of membranes. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pitzer KS, Pabalan RT (1986) Thermodynamics of NaCl in steam. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50(7):1445–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramon GZ, Feinberg BJ, Hoek EMV (2011) Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power. Energy Environ Sci 4(11):4423–4434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Post JW, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2008) Energy recovery from controlled mixing salt and fresh water with a reverse electrodialysis system. Environ Sci Technol 42(15):5785–5790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hill KO, Meltz G (1997) Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview. J Light Technol 15(8):1263–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kinet D, Mégret P, Goossen K, Qiu L, Heider D, Caucheteur C (2014) Fiber Bragg grating sensors toward structural health monitoring in composite materials: challenges and solutions. Sensors 14(4):7394–7419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjersti W. Krakhella
    • 1
  • Markus Wahl
    • 2
  • Eilif S. Øyre
    • 3
  • Jacob J. Lamb
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Odne S. Burheim
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, ENERSENSENorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Electronic Systems, ENERSENSENorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of Energy and Process Engineering, ENERSENSENorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Department of Energy and Process Engineering, ENERSENSE and NTNU Team HydrogenNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations