Clients’ Practices for Resisting Treatment Recommendations in Japanese Outpatient Psychiatry
- 17 Downloads
Clients’ orientation to professional authority has been proposed as a way to explain their reluctance to participate actively in medical decision-making. This study describes some of the practices clients use to resist psychiatrists’ treatment recommendations in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. It focuses on how the clients’ resistance practices influence the way the psychiatrist proceeds with the decision-making. The data analysis shows that while clients consistently avoid intruding into psychiatrists’ professional authority, clients methodically navigate the decision-making sequence toward a decision that is sensitive to their preference and concerns. This study argues that clients exert agency in treatment negotiations through practices to resist recommendations, and that these practices can be regarded as important opportunities for enhancing client participation in decision-making.
KeywordsResistance Client participation Agency Authority Medication adjustment Outpatient consultation Japan
This study was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 20200043, 21530496, 23330183, and 24530623.
- Angell, B., & Bolden, G. B. (2016). Team work in action: Building grounds for psychiatric medication decisions in assertive community treatment. In M. O’Reilly & J. Lester (Eds.), Handbook of adult mental health: Discourse and conversation studies (pp. 371–393). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Barton, J., Dew, K., Dowell, A., Sheridan, N., Kenealy, T., Macdonald, L., … Stubbe, M. (2016). Patient resistance as a resource: Candidate obstacles in diabetes consultations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(7), 1151–1166.Google Scholar
- Bolden, G. B., & Angell, B. (2017). The organization of the treatment recommendation phase in routine psychiatric visits. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 451–479.Google Scholar
- Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar