Social Media and Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Role of Digital Source Selection and Information Literacy

  • Shahrokh Nikou
  • Malin E. BrännbackEmail author
  • Thao Phuong Orrensalo
  • Gunilla Widén
Part of the Exploring Diversity in Entrepreneurship book series (EDE)


Internet-based applications, such as social media, offer potentially effective and efficient vehicles to access, use, and distribute information as well as means to network with other actors. However, for realizing this potential, critical competencies are information and digital literacy. In this chapter we discuss the importance of information literacy (IL) in the context of social media. Information literacy is defined as cognitive skills necessary for using and evaluating information in an educated and effective way. IL is a necessary competence for entrepreneurs in general and specifically for entrepreneurs relying entirely or partially on social media in their entrepreneurial activities. We argue that access and use of information is an important way for entrepreneurs to reduce uncertainty in their entrepreneurial action. Information literacy and information source selection are important to practicing entrepreneurs as most need to access information in order to run their business, information from policy makers, financing institutions, tax authorities, and legal counsel, to name a few. This information is today inherently provided in digital format.

In this chapter our focus is on digital information and specifically digital source selection and information literacy. We have studied 145 Finnish entrepreneurs and analyzed their information literacy in relation to digital source selection. Results show that while information literacy impacts digital information source selection, that relationship is influenced by source accessibility and the task complexity. Interestingly, and somewhat unexpectedly, the study revealed that source selection is directly influenced by the opinions of peers or social norms.


Digital literacy Digital transformation Entrepreneurship Information literacy 


  1. Adeleke D. S., & Emeahara E. N. (2016). Relationship between information literacy and use of electronic information resources by postgraduate students of the University of Ibadan. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal) 1381. Retrieved from: Scholar
  2. Agarwal N. K. (2011). Information source and its relationship with the context of information seeking behavior. iConference.Google Scholar
  3. Akinso A. (2018). Successful strategies for the survival of business owners in Nigeria. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection. Walden University.Google Scholar
  4. Apuke, O., & Iyendo, J. T. (2018). University students' usage of the internet resources for research and learning: Forms of access and perceptions of utility. Computer science. Information science. Heliyon, 4(12), e01052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Attuquayefio, S., Achampong, A., & Aryeetey, I. (2014). Extending TAM with social norm to model students’ intentions to adopt ICT. European Scientific Journal, 10(14), 435–446.Google Scholar
  6. Ayeh, J. K., Au, N., & Law, R. (2013). Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning. Tourism Management, 35, 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babalhavaeji, F., & Farhadpoor, M. R. (2013). Information source characteristics and environmental scanning by academic library managers. Information Research, 18(1). paper 568. [Available at].Google Scholar
  8. Bawden, D. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Origins and concepts (pp. 17–32). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Brännback, M. (1997). Is the internet changing the dominant logic of marketing? European Management Journal, 15(6), 698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brännback, M., Nikou, S., & Bouwman, H. (2017). Value systems and intentions to interact in social media: The digital natives. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronstein, J. (2010). Selecting and using information sources: Source preferences and information pathways of Israeli library and information science students. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 15(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Capella A. (2012). Translating ideas into action: The policy entrepreneur role at the public policy process. Madrid: XXII world congress of political science – “reordering power, shifting boundaries”. International Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  13. Case, O. D. (2012). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior (3rd ed.). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  14. Ciftci, T., & Knautz, K. (2016). Information Facebook users. In K. Knautz & K. S. Baran (Eds.), Facets of Facebooks: Use and users (pp. 115–145). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Constantinides, E., & Holleschovsky, N. (2016). Impact of online product reviews on purchasing decisions. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on web information systems and technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 271–278).Google Scholar
  16. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drucker, P. F. (2002). Managing in the next society. New York: Truman Talley.Google Scholar
  19. Durodolu, O. (2016). Technology Acceptance Model as a predictor of using information system’ to acquire information literacy skills. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1450 1–27. Retrieved from:
  20. Eshet-Alalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.Google Scholar
  21. Gracia, D., Ariño, L., & Blanco, C. (2012). Understanding the influence of social information sources on e-government adoption. Information Research, 17(3) paper 531. [Available at].
  22. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy: Defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills. Florida State University Libraries.Google Scholar
  23. Haase, H., & Franco, M. (2011). Information sources for environmental scanning: Do industry and firm size matter? Management Decision, 49(10), 1642–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henry, G. T. (1990). Practical sampling. Applied social research methods series. Newburry Park, CA: Page.Google Scholar
  26. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hosier, A. (2015). Teaching information literacy through “un-research”. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(2), 162–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, N., Borgman, R., & Ulusoy, E. (2015). Impact of social media on small businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(4), 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Julien, H., & Michels, D. (2013). Source selection among information seekers: Ideals and realities. In Proceedings of the annual conference of CAIS/Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI.Google Scholar
  30. Kao, T. Y., Yang, M. H., Wu, J. T. B., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2016). Co-creating value with consumers through social media. Journal of Service Marketing, 30(2), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan, P. J. (2002). F’d Companies, spectacular dot-com flameouts. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Kim, K., & Sin, S. J. (2011). Selecting quality sources: Bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources. Journal of Information Science, 20(10), 1–12.Google Scholar
  34. Kirton, J., & Barham, L. (2005). Information literacy in the workplace. The Australian Library Journal, 54(4), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirui, E., & Kemei, P. (2014). Usability of E-government services in developing countries. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), 15(3), 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuhn, K. M., & Galloway, T. L. (2015). With a little help from my competitors: Peer networking among artisan entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice., 39(3), 571–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuma, G. T., & Sampath, B. T. (2008). Use of electronic information sources by the academic community: a comparative study. Proceedings of the 6th international Caliber 2008, from automaton to transformation, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, February 28–29, INFLIBNET, Ahmedabad, 529–40.Google Scholar
  38. Kurbanoglu, S. S., Akkoyunlu, B., & Umay, A. (2006). Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 730–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, J., Paik, W., & Joo, S. (2012). Information resource selection of undergraduate students in academic search tasks. Information Research, 17(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  40. Li, J., & Herd, M. A. (2017). Shifting practices in digital workplace learning: An integrated approach to learning, knowledge management, and knowledge sharing. Human Resource Development International, 20(3), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 14(10), 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindstedt, G. (2001). och IT-bubblan som sprack (in Swedish: and the IT-bubble which burst), Bokförlaget DN, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  43. Lozanova-Belcheva, E. (2013). The impact of information literacy education for the use of E-government services: The role of the libraries. In S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts, & S. Špiranec (Eds.), Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice. ECIL 2013. Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 397). Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Machado, H. (2016). Growth of small businesses: A literature review and perspectives of studies. Gestão & Produção São Carlos, 23(2), 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marton, C., & Choo, C. W. (2002). A question of quality: the effect of source quality on information seeking by women in IT professions. Proceedings of the ASIST annual meeting, 65, 140–151.Google Scholar
  46. Mir, A. A. (2014). Effects of pre-purchase search motivation on user attitudes toward online social network advertising: A case of university students. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(2), 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moghavvemi, S., Salleh, M., Zhao, W., & Mattila, M. (2012). The entrepreneurs perception on information technology innovation adoption: An empirical analysis of the role of precipitating events on usage behaviour. Innovation-Management Policy & Practice, 14(2), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Najat, B. (2017). Importance of customer knowledge in business organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(11), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Towards a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice., 41(6), 1029–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nguyen, N. N. (2018). The role of government in the development of ethnic entrepreneurs: A qualitative study on Vietnamese ethnic entrepreneurs in Finland. Turku School of Economics: Master Thesis in International Business.Google Scholar
  52. Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Cole, P., & Martin, H. (2000). The impact of the internet on information seeking in the media. ASLIB Proceedings, 52(3), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nikou, S., Brännback, M., & Widén, G. (2018). The impact of multidimensionality of literacy on the use of digital technology: Digital immigrants and digital natives. In H. Li, Á. Pálsdóttir, R. Trill, R. Suomi, & Y. Amelina (Eds.), Well-being in the information society. Fighting inequalities. WIS 2018. Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 907). Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Nikou, S., Mezei, J., & Brännback, M. (2018). Digital natives’ interactive behaviour on social media: Value systems and gender. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Odede, I. R., & Nsibirwa Z. (2018). Information literacy skills in using electronic information resource, 1–17. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1947. 1–17. Retrieved from:
  56. Oman, J. (2001). Information literacy in the workplace. Information Outlook, 5(6), 33–35.Google Scholar
  57. Parveen, F., Jaafar, N. I., & Ainin, S. (2016). Social media’s impact on organizational performance and entrepreneurial orientation in organizations. Management Decision, 54(9), 2208–2234.Google Scholar
  58. Pierce, R. (2008). Evaluating information: Validity, reliability, accuracy, triangulation. Research Methods in Politics. Canada: SAGE Publication.Google Scholar
  59. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and pro- spects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Popoola, S. O., & Okiki, O. C. (2013). Information availability and utilization as determinants of creativity of managers in commercial banks in Nigeria. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 3(8), 22–34.Google Scholar
  61. Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Tassabehji, R., & Castelli, M. (2018). The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(2), 209–222.Google Scholar
  62. Ranaweera, P. (2008). Importance of information literacy skills for an information literate society. Colombo, Sri Lanka: NACLIS.Google Scholar
  63. Renko, M., Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2009). The effect of a market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and technological capability on innovativeness: A study of young biotechnology ventures in the US and in Scandinavia. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 331–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schon, J., Ristic, I., & Manning, J. (2015). When the internet becomes the doctor: Seeking health information online. In M. Brann (Ed.), Contemporary case studies in health communication: Theoretical and applied approaches (2nd ed., pp. 311–322). U.S.: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  65. Singh, D., Ogbonnaya, C. O., & Ohakwe, J. (2011). Factors affecting the use of informationservices by international students. Malaysian Continental Journal of Applied Science, 6(3), 8–18.Google Scholar
  66. Smeltzer, L. R., Van Hook, B. L., & Hutt, R. W. (1991). Analysis of the use of advisors as information sources in venture start-ups. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 10–20.Google Scholar
  67. Sterne, J. (1995). World wide web marketing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Sterne, J. (1996). Customer service on the internet: Building relationships, increasing loyalty and staying competitive. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  69. Susanto, T., & Aljoza, M. (2015). Individual acceptance of e-government services in a developing country: Dimensions of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and the importance of trust and social influence. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sussaen, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Bsuiness Economics, 49(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy. Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  72. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  73. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vodanovich, S., Sundaram, D., & Myers, M. (2010). Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Information System Research, 21(4), 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. von Briel, F., Davidsson, P., & Recker, J. (2018). Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woudstra, L., Hooff, B., & Schouten, A. (2016). The quality versus accessibility debate revisited: A contingency perspective on human information source selection. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2060–2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2010). Selection of information sources: Accessibility of and familiarity with sources, and types of tasks. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang, Y. (2013). The effects of preference for information on consumers' online health information search behaviour. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(11), 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations