Advertisement

Are Romanian Employees Satisfied with Their Jobs, with the Performance Evaluation Process? An Empirical Analysis Among Employees from Public Versus Private Sector

  • Adriana Ana Maria Davidescu
  • Alexandra BeiuEmail author
  • Mihaela Mosora
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This paper investigates the differences in employees’ perceptions from the public and private sectors related to job satisfaction, its determinants, and also the satisfaction related to the performance evaluation process using empirical research based on the opinions of 301 employees from different sectors of activity. The paper aims to respond to the following key research questions: are there statistical differences concerning job satisfaction and also the perceptions regarding the performance evaluation process in public vs. private sector? Does the performance evaluation process has the same characteristics in different types of sectors and leads to the same level of satisfaction or, on the contrary, the discrepancies between the private and public sector are really high? In order to respond to these questions, descriptive statistics, non-parametric correlation, and non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney) have been used. The empirical results revealed that the level of job satisfaction is higher in the public sector compared to the private sector, while Romanian employees tend to be more satisfied with the received salary in the private sector. Furthermore, employees from public sector considered the attractive benefit package, the good potential salary, and the perspective of hierarchical advancement as the engine to increase the overall level of work motivation. Concerning the level of satisfaction related to the last employee evaluations, it can be revealed that in both sectors, the analysis of superiors' opinion was the main method used in the employee evaluation, pointing out the relevance of work quality, and also the fact that the public sector employees appear to have a higher degree of satisfaction with the last evaluations compared to those from the private sector.

Keywords

Employees’ motivation Performance evaluation process Non-parametric tests Sector-type analysis Romanian companies 

JEL Classification

O15 C83 J28 J53 J45 

References

  1. Anderfuhren-Biget, S., Varone, F., Giauque, D., & Ritz, A. (2010). Motivating employees of the public sector: Does public service motivation matter? International Public Management Journal, 13(3), 213–246.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.503783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bear, J. B. et al. (2017). Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.003
  3. Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozeman, B., & Ponomariov, B. (2009). Sector switching from a business to a government job: Fast-track career or fast track to nowhere? Public Administration Review, 69(1), 77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01942.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, S., Leeves, G., & Green, C. P. (2007). Employment contracts and effort: Why do temporary workers take less absence? Labour Economics, 14(3), 319–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2006.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buelens, M., & Van Den Broeck, H. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00697.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cristescu, A., Stanila, L., & Andreica, M. E. (2013). Motivarea funcţionarilor publici din România în contextul crizei economice. Economie teoretică şi aplicată 10(587), 45–60. https://store.ectap.ro/articole/912_ro.pdf.
  8. Cole, G. A. (1994). Personnel management. Theory and practice (4th ed.). London: Letta Educational, Aldine Place.Google Scholar
  9. Drunea, C. (2014). Staff performance evaluation in public organizations. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 7(56, 2), 133–138. https://webbut.unitbv.ro/BU2014/Series%20V/BULETIN%20V/III-06_DRUMEA.pdf.
  10. Engellandt, A., Riphahn, R. T. (2005). Temporary contracts and employee effort. Labour Economics, 12, 281–299. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927-5371(04)00003-X.
  11. Fataciune, M. N. (2017). Dezvoltarea sistemelor de motivare a funcţionarilor publici în unele state ale Uniunii Europene. https://doctorat.snspa.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Rezumat-teza-Mirela-BADALAN_RO.pdf.
  12. Frank, S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working? American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 36–51.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003258823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ichino, A., & Riphahn, R. T. (2004). Absenteeism and employment protection: Three case studies. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11, 95–114.Google Scholar
  14. Lefter, V., Davidescu, A. A. M., & Beiu, A. (2018, May). Is the employees’ performance appraisal process different in the large romanian companies? An empirical research. In Griffiths school of management and IT annual conference on business, entrepreneurship and ethics (pp. 51–69). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  15. Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.  https://doi.org/10.2307/976618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rainey H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–470. https://blog.ub.ac.id/sekararumkinanti/files/2014/10/Public-VS-Business-Organization.pdf.
  18. Rainey, H. G., Chun, Y. H. (2005). Public and private management compared. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Su, X., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Dynamics of sector switching: hazard models predicting changes from private jobs to public and nonprofit sectors. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1106–1114. https://doi.org/:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02068.x.
  20. Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal Public Administration Theory, 11(4), 559–586.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright, B. E. (2003, October 9–11). Toward understanding task, mission and public service motivation: A conceptual and empirical synthesis of goal theory and public service motivation. Paper presented at the 7th National Public Management Research Conference. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Public Policy Institute, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana Ana Maria Davidescu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandra Beiu
    • 3
    Email author
  • Mihaela Mosora
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and EconometricsBucharest Academy of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Labour Market Policies Department, The National Research Institute for Labour and Social ProtectionBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Bucharest Academy of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsBucharest Academy of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations