Advertisement

PLDetect: A Testbed for Middlebox Detection Using PlanetLab

  • Paul Kirth
  • Vahab PournaghshbandEmail author
Conference paper
  • 43 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 309)

Abstract

Designing, coordinating and deploying repeatable experiments outside of a fully controlled environment pose a serious challenge when conducting network research. In particular, it can be difficult to correctly schedule experiments that collect bulk data using a shared resource. To address this problem, we introduce PLDetect, a simple testbed built on top of PlanetLab which simplifies configuring, scheduling, and deploying large scale Internet experiments for evaluating middlebox detection methods.

Keywords

Middlebox Detection method Active measurements Testbed PlanetLab 

References

  1. 1.
    Releases/8/schedule - FedoraProject. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/Schedule
  2. 2.
    Albrecht, J., Tuttle, C., Snoeren, A.C., Vahdat, A.: PlanetLab application management using plush. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 40(1), 33–40 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bavier, A., et al.: The GENI experiment engine. ACM Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berman, M., et al.: GENI: a federated testbed for innovative network experiments. Comput. Netw. 61, 5–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cappos, J., et al.: Stork: package management for distributed VM environments. In: LISA, vol. 7, pp. 1–16Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Detal, G., Hesmans, B., Bonaventure, O., Vanaubel, Y., Donnet, B.: Revealing middlebox interference with tracebox. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2013, pp. 1–8. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henning, J.L.: SPEC CPU2006 benchmark descriptions. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 34(4), 1–17 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1186736.1186737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu, G., Chen, Y., Birrer, S., Bustamante, F., Cheung, C.Y., Li, X.: End-to-end inference of router packet forwarding priority. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2007, 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1784–1792 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peterson, L.L., Bavier, A.C.: Using PlanetLab for network research: Myths, realities, and best practices. In: WORLDSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pournaghshband, V., Afanasyev, A., Reiher, P.: End-to-end detection of compression of traffic flows by intermediaries. In: 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), pp. 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ravaioli, R., Urvoy-Keller, G., Barakat, C.: Towards a general solution for detecting traffic differentiation at the internet access. In: 2015 27th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 27), pp. 1–9 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tariq, M.B., Motiwala, M., Feamster, N., Ammar, M.: Detecting network neutrality violations with causal inference. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, CoNEXT 2009, pp. 289–300. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venezia, P.: Review: ansible orchestration is a veteran Unix admin’s dream; ansible and AnsibleWorks AWX bring simplicity and power to Linux and Unix server automation. http://www.infoworld.com/article/2612397/data-center/review-ansible-orchestration-is-a-veteran-unix-admin-s-dream.html
  14. 14.
    Wachs, M., Herold, N., Posselt, S.-A., Dold, F., Carle, G.: GPLMT: a lightweight experimentation and testbed management framework. In: Karagiannis, T., Dimitropoulos, X. (eds.) PAM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9631, pp. 165–176. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30505-9_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weinsberg, U., Soule, A., Massoulie, L.: Inferring traffic shaping and policy parameters using end host measurements. In: 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 151–155 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, Y., Mao, Z.M., Zhang, M.: Detecting traffic differentiation in backbone ISPs with NetPolice. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2009, pp. 103–115. ACM (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State University, NorthridgeLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations