Advertisement

Fusion the Coordinate Data of Airborne Objects in the Networks of Surveillance Radar Observation Systems

  • Ivan Obod
  • Iryna SvydEmail author
  • Oleksandr Maltsev
  • Ganna Zavolodko
  • Daria Pavlova
  • Galyna Maistrenko
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 48)

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a classification of surveillance radar surveillance systems of airspace, which are among the main information sources of the airspace control system and air traffic control. A brief description of the information processing process in survey radar systems for observing airspace is given and it is shown that the complexity of the processing system does not allow formalization and analysis of its robots as a whole; therefore, it is necessary to preliminarily divide the system into elements and study their functioning separately. The tasks of information processing at the stage of signal processing are considered, as well as a brief description of the primary, secondary and tertiary data processing. It is shown that the fusion of information from the same air objects can be carried out at all stages of data processing. It is shown that the transition to the assessment of the four-dimensional location (4D) of an airborne object changes the procedures for merging individual measurements carried out by various radar observation systems with different rates of data output. This is due to the fact, that from the output of the primary data processing by monitoring systems, an airborne object form is issued, which includes the time to estimate the coordinates of the airborne object with the necessary accuracy.

Keywords

First keyword Second keyword Third key surveillance systems Air object Secondary surveillance radar Data processing Multi-radar data processing 

References

  1. 1.
    Farina A, Studer F (1993) Digital processing of radar information. Radio i svyaz, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ueda T, Shiomi K, Ino M, Imamiya K (1998) Passive secondary surveillance radar system for satellite airports and local ATC facilities. 43rd annual air traffic control association. Atlantic City, Air Traffic Control Association, pp 20–24Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Skolnik M (2008) Radar handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chernyak V (1998) Fundamentals of multisite radar systems, 1st edn. Gordon & Breach, Amsterdam, p 492Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lynn P (1987) Radar systems. Springer, New York, Boston, p 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stevens M (1988) Secondary surveillance radar. Artech House, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim E, Sivits K (2015) Blended secondary surveillance radar solutions to improve air traffic surveillance. Aerosp Sci Technol 45:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloisi D, Iocchi L, Nardi D, Fiorini M, Graziano G (2012) Ground traffic surveillance system for air traffic control. In: 2012 12th international conference on ITS telecommunications, pp 160–164.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2012.6425151
  9. 9.
    Ahmadi Y, Mohamedpour K, Ahmadi M (2010) Deinterleaving of interfering radars signals in identification friend or Foe Systems. In: 18th telecommunications forum Telfor, Telecommunications Society. ETF School of EE, University in Belgrade, IEEE Serbia & Montenegro COM CHAPTER, Belgrade, pp 729–733Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson D (2016) Ensuring honest behaviour in cooperative surveillance systems. The Centre for Doctoral Training in Cyber Security, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siergiejczyk M, Krzykowska K, Rosiński A (2014) Reliability assessment of cooperation and replacement of surveillance systems in air traffic. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on dependability and complex systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, June 30–July 4, 2014, Brunów, Poland, pp 403–411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07013-1_39
  12. 12.
    Ramasamy S, Sabatini R, Gardi A (2016) Cooperative and non-cooperative sense-and-avoid in the CNS+A context: a unified methodology. In: 2016 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), pp 531–539.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2016.7502676
  13. 13.
    Svyd I, Obod I, Maltsev O, Shtykh I, Maistrenko G, Zavolodko G (2019) Comparative quality analysis of the air objects detection by the secondary surveillance radar. In: 2019 IEEE 39th international conference on electronics and nanotechnology (ELNANO).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ELNANO.2019.8783539
  14. 14.
    Obod I, Svyd I, Maltsev O, Maistrenko G, Zubkov O, Zavolodko G (2019) Bandwidth assessment of cooperative surveillance systems. In: 2019 3rd international conference on advanced information and communications technologies (AICT).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AIACT.2019.8847742
  15. 15.
    Obod I, Svyd I, Maltsev O, Vorgul O, Maistrenko G, Zavolodko G (2018) Optimization of data transfer in cooperative surveillance systems. In: 2018 international scientific-practical conference problems of infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T).  https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMMST.2018.8632134
  16. 16.
    Olivier B, Pierre G, Nicolas H, Loc O, Olivier T, Philippe T (2009) Multi sensor data fusion architectures for air traffic control applications. Sensor and data fusion, pp 103–122Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pabst T, Kunze T, Schultz M, Fricke H (2013) Aircraft trajectory simulator using a three degrees of freedom aircraft point mass model. In: 3rd international conference on application and theory of automation in command and control systems (ATACCS’2013). ATACCS’2013, Naplesm pp 132–135Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hao S, Cheng S, Zhang Y (2018) A multi-aircraft conflict detection and resolution method for 4-dimensional trajectory-based operation. Chin J Aeronaut 31(7):1579–1593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.04.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan S, Cai K (2017) A multi-objective multi-memetic algorithm for network-wide conflict-free 4D flight trajectories planning. Chin J Aeronaut 30(3):1161–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruiz S, Piera M, Nosedal J, Ranieri A (2014) Strategic de-confliction in the presence of a large number of 4D trajectories using a causal modeling approach. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 39:129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alejo D, Cobano J, Heredia G, Ollero A (2013) Particle swarm optimization for collision-free 4D trajectory planning in unmanned aerial vehicles. In: 2013 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), pp 298–307.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2013.6564702
  22. 22.
    Pjatko S, Krasnova A (2004) Automated air traffic control systems: new information technologies in aviation. Politehnika, Saint-Petersburg, p 446Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dang K, Le T, Fung K (2017) The trajectory of the observed objects in the problem of tertiary processing of radar information. Nat Tech Sci 10(112):97–105Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mazimpaka J, Timpf S (2016) Trajectory data mining: a review of methods and applications. J Spatial Inf Sci 13:61–99.  https://doi.org/10.5311/josis.2016.13.263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yepes J, Hwang I, Rotea M (2007) New algorithms for aircraft intent inference and trajectory prediction. J Guid Control Dyn 30(2):370–382.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.26750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen X, Landry S, Nof S (2011) A framework of enroute air traffic conflict detection and resolution through complex network analysis. Comput Ind 62(8–9):787–794.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2011.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paielli R, Erzberger H, Chiu D, Heere K (2009) Tactical conflict alerting aid for air traffic controllers. J Guid Control Dyn 32(1):184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Svyd I, Obod I, Maltsev O, Maistrenko G, Zavolodko G, Pavlova D (2019) Fusion of airspace surveillance systems data. In: 2019 3rd international conference on advanced information and communications technologies (AICT).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AIACT.2019.8847916
  29. 29.
    Pavlova D, Zavolodko G, Obod I, Svyd I, Maltsev O, Saikivska L (2019) Optimizing data processing in information networks of airspace surveillance systems. In: 2019 10th international conference on dependable systems, services and technologies (DESSERT).  https://doi.org/10.1109/DESSERT.2019.8770022
  30. 30.
    Svyd I, Obod I, Maltsev O, Vorgul O, Zavolodko G, Goriushkina A (2018) Noise immunity of data transfer channels in cooperative observation systems: comparative analysis. In: 2018 international scientific-practical conference problems of infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T).  https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMMST.2018.8632019
  31. 31.
    Pavlova D, Zavolodko G, Obod I, Svyd I, Maltsev O, Saikivska L (2019) Comparative analysis of data consolidation in surveillance networks. In: 2019 10th international conference on dependable systems, services and technologies (DESSERT).  https://doi.org/10.1109/DESSERT.2019.8770008
  32. 32.
    Rodríguez-Sanz Á, Álvarez D, Comendador F, Valdés R, Pérez-Castán J, Godoy M (2018) Air traffic management based on 4D trajectories: a reliability analysis using multi-state systems theory. Transp Res Procedia 33:355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Svyd I, Obod I, Maltsev O, Shtykh I, Zavolodko G, Maistrenko G (2019) Model and method for request signals processing of secondary surveillance radar. In: 2019 IEEE 15th international conference on the experience of designing and application of CAD systems (CADSM).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CADSM.2019.8779347
  34. 34.
    Obod I, Svyd I, Maltsev O, Zavolodko G, Pavlova D, Maistrenko G (2019) Fusion of discrete evaluation of the state vector of air objects based on 4D measurement. In: 2019 international scientific-practical conference problems of infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T). https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST47496.2019.9061562

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kharkiv National University of Radio ElectronicsKharkivUkraine
  2. 2.National Technical University «KhPI»KharkivUkraine

Personalised recommendations