Advertisement

User’s Privacy Management in IoT Environment Using Dojot Platform

  • Rafael Tomé de SouzaEmail author
  • Gustavo Faganello dos Santos
  • Sergio D. Zorzo
Conference paper
  • 50 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1134)

Abstract

User’s privacy management in an environment with many restrictions such as the Internet of Things is a challenge. This paper aims at showing that it is possible to handle the user’s privacy in a distributed environment and let the user control the data. In order to do so, a case study was implemented using the dojot platform to validate the user control over the data based on an interface implemented in the Central Server of the IoT environment created, and the approach is valid to other IoT systems. The performance test showed minimum impact, adding an interface to apply rules based on user’s preferences. Thus, the approach was a viable solution to manage privacy in the IoT environment and increase privacy awareness.

Keywords

Location Privacy Smart objects Data share and awareness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

References

  1. 1.
    Serpanos, D., Wolf, M.C.: Internet-of-Things (IoT) Systems: - Architectures, Algorithms, Methodologies. Springer International Publishing, New York (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Girma, A.: Analysis of security vulnerability and analytics of internet of things (Iot) platform. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) Information Technology - New Generations (ITNG-2018), pp. 101–104. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olson, P.: Samsung’s Smart TVs Share Living Room Conversations with Third Parties. https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2015/02/09/samsungs-smart-tv-data-sharing-nuance/#2fc5e23d126e
  4. 4.
    Machkovech, S.: Amazon Confirms that Echo Device Secretly Shared User’s Private Audio [Updated]. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/05/amazon-confirms-that-echo-device-secretly-shared-users-private-audio/
  5. 5.
    Lopes, B., de Pontes, D.R.G., Zorzo, S.D.: An instrument for measuring privacy in Iot environments. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) 16th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations (ITNG 2019), pp. 49–55. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langheinrich, M.: Privacy by Design — Principles of Privacy-aware Ubiquitous Systems. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 273–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westin, A., Solove, D.: Privacy and Freedom. Ig Publishing, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Brasil - Lei no 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018 - Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709.htm
  10. 10.
    Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Haddadi, H., Mortier, R.: Special theme on privacy and the internet of things. In: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 22, pp. 289–292. Springer, London (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chow, R.: The last mile for IoT privacy. In: IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 15, pp. 73–76. IEEE, Piscataway (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torre, I., Koceva, F., Sanchez, O.R., Adorni, G.: A framework for personal data protection in the IoT. In: 2016 11th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), pp. 384–391. IEEE, Barcelona (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, E., Chow, R.: What Can I do Here? IoT Service Discovery in Smart Cities. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 1–6. IEEE, Sydney (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naeini, P.E., Bhagavatula, S., Habib, H., Degeling, M., Bauer, L., Cranor, L.F., Sadeh, N.: Privacy expectations and preferences in an Iot world. In: Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017), pp. 399–412. USENIX Association, Santa Clara (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, H., Kobsa, A.: Privacy preference modeling and prediction in a simulated campuswide Iot environment. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), vol. 2017, pp. 276–285. IEEE, Kona (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, H., Kobsa, A.: Understanding user privacy in internet of things environments. In: 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 407–412. IEEE, Reston (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehrpouyan, H., Azpiazu, I.M., Pera, M.S.: Measuring personality for automatic elicitation of privacy preferences. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC), pp. 84–95. IEEE, Washington (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Santos, G.F.: Gerenciamento de Privacidade em Ambientes de Internet das Coisas – Estudo de Caso: Middleware dojot. UFSCar, São Carlos (2019)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ziegeldorf, J.H., Morchon, O.G., Wehrle, K.: Privacy in the internet of things: threats and challenges. In: Security and Communication Networks, vol. 7, pp. 2728–2742. Wiley, Chichester (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Tomé de Souza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gustavo Faganello dos Santos
    • 1
  • Sergio D. Zorzo
    • 1
  1. 1.UFSCar, Computer Science DepartmentSão CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations