Advertisement

Ways to Improve the School Buildings Capital Fund

  • Vadym Kutsevych
  • Halyna Osychenko
  • Volodymyr Rusin
  • Olga TyshkevychEmail author
Conference paper
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 73)

Abstract

The article investigates effective directions of improving existing rural school buildings capital fund (on the example of Ukraine). The study was performed using an algorithm consisting of four steps. The study considered the prerequisites for improving the network and types of rural school buildings. Based on the analysis of modern socio-pedagogical concepts, the requirements for the material and technical base of schools in rural areas have been identified. The authors considered the existing fund of school buildings in rural areas of Ukraine regarding its compliance with modern social and pedagogical requirements. The study found that the main areas for improving the capital stock of school buildings in rural areas are modernization and reconstruction. The methodology of reconstruction works has been expanded; the method of calculating the effectiveness of reconstructive measures has been improved. It is revealed that the cost of reconstruction depends on the technical condition, building type and the number of premises that are insufficient (unnecessary).

Keywords

Rural school building Network Reconstruction Modernization 

References

  1. 1.
    Law of Ukraine. (2002). On the National Doctrine of Education Development. № 347/2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Law of Ukraine. (2017). About education. № 2145-VII.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Law of Ukraine. (1999). About general secondary education. № 651-XIV.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Socio-economic situation of rural settlements of Ukraine: Stat. Collection. (2016). Kyiv, UA: State Statistics Committee of Ukraine.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boarin, P., & Davoli, P. (2015). Deep renovation of the school building stock: the European opportunity and the Italian strategy. Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 0(9), 96–105.  https://doi.org/10.13128/techne-16110.
  6. 6.
    Tyshkevych, O. P. (2010). Architectural-planning organization of rural small schools (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). Available from Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine. (RA373035).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stepanov, V. I. (1975). School buildings. Moscow, USSR: Stroyizdat.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Methodical recommendations for the design of institutions of general secondary education. (2017). Kyiv, UA: PAT KYIVZNDIEP”.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perkins, B. (2001). Elementary and secondary school. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guidelines for the Improvement and Use of the Rural Secondary Schools Building Fund. (1991). Kyiv, UA: UkrNIIPgrazhdanselstroy.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyshkevych, O., & Obidniy, A. (2018). The main approaches for increasing the efficiency of the rural school network. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3.2), Special Issue 2, 686–691.  https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.2.14614.
  12. 12.
    Guryanova, M. P. (2003). Reserves for the modernization of the rural small-scale school in Russia. Moscow, RU: IPSR RAO.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Congedo, P. M., D’Agostino, D., Baglivo, C., Tornese, G., & Zacà, I. (2016). Efficient solutions and cost-optimal analysis for existing school buildings. Energies 20169(10), 851.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100851.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyiv National University of Construction and ArchitectureKievUkraine
  2. 2.O. M. Beketov National University of Urban EconomyinKharkivUkraine
  3. 3.State Enterprise “UkrStateBuildExpertise”PoltavaUkraine
  4. 4.Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk UniversityPoltavaUkraine

Personalised recommendations