Advertisement

Big Cities Industrial Territories Revitalization Problems and Ways of Their Solution

  • Mykola Dyomin
  • Andrii DmytrenkoEmail author
  • Denys Chernyshev
  • Oleksandr Ivashko
Conference paper
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 73)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify characteristic for Ukraine organizational, functional planning and design features of art formations creating on the revitalized industrial enterprises’ basis (on condition that the main part of the existing building is preserved). The method of comparative analysis was used. Existing art formations examples were analyzed based on revitalized industrial enterprises in major cities of Ukraine, in post-Soviet countries and in the European Union. The classification of industrial enterprises and individual buildings according to their suitability for revitalization was first developed. The techniques of multi-story industrial buildings’ reconstruction for other functions, including art function, have been improved. The hierarchical model of art formations was developed for the first time, the art cluster definition was specified, and the classification of art clusters by functional feature was developed. The specific functional and planning art clusters features in the post-Soviet space were revealed. The study results can be used in the development of promising cities concepts, detailed plans of industrial areas to be revitalized and reconstruction projects of individual industrial enterprises and buildings.

Keywords

Construction Revitalization Industrial territories Evaluation criterion Art formation 

References

  1. 1.
    Antonova, A. (2015). Art-klastery kak prostranstvo dlya razvitiya kulturnogo potentsiala goroda. In Proceedings of the XLVII Intern. Research and Practical Conf. V mire nauki i iskusstva: voprosy filologii, iskusstvovedeniya i kulturologii, 4(47), pp. 56–59. SibAK, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gyurkovich, M. (2019). Wybrane przykłady transformacji zespołów poprzemysłowych. Wiadomości Konserwatorskie, 57, 142–157.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iwaszko, O. (2018). Społeczna Przyroda Nowych Artystycznych kierunków w Miejskim Środowisku. Przestrzeń/Urbanistyka/Architektura, 2, 167–176.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivashko, O. (2018). Comparative analysis of Art-clusters—a new type of multi-functional buildings and their location in the city’s structure. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe (Housing environment), 25, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ivashko, O. (2019). The issues of conservation and revitalization of the monuments of industrial architecture. Wiadomości Konserwatorskie, 58, 143–147.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orlenko, M., & Ivashko, O. (2017). Art-clusters as a new type of buildings: The specificity of the spatial solution and the features of restoration during the redevelopment process (the experience of Poland). Środowisko Mieszkaniowe (Housing environment), 21, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivashko, Y. (2013). The fundamentals of formation of the art nouveau style in Ukraine (the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century) (doctoral dissertation). Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Furtak, M., Kobylarczyk, J., & Kuśnierz-Krupa, D. (2019). Beton w adaptacjach i rozbudowach obiektów zabytkowych (na wybranych przykładach z Porto). Wiadomości Konserwatorskie, 58, 15–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Makarova, K. (2010). Postindustrializm, dzhentrifikatsiya i transformatsiya gorodskogo prostranstva v sovremennoy Moskve. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2, 150–152.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orlenko, M. (2018). Issues and methods of restoration of architectural monuments in Ukraine (11th century—the early 20th century) (Doctoral dissertation). Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pleshkanovska, A., & Biriuk, S. (2014). Mistse promyslovykh terytorii v planuvalnii strukturi krupnoho mista ta napriamy ikh transformatsii (na prykladi m. Kyieva). Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, 37, 263–267.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fedotova, N. (2013). Kreativnyi klaster v kontekste sotsiokulturnykh problem regiona. In Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Socio-Cultural Space of Modern Russia: Challenges of the XXI Century” (pp. 59–68). Moscow: Knizhnyi Dom.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boix, R., Capone, F., De Propris, L., Lazzeretti, L., & Sanchez, D. (2016). Comparing creative industries in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 935–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karachalis, N., & Deffner, A. (2012). Rethinking the connection between creative clusters and city branding: The cultural axis of Piraeus Street in Athens. Quaestiones Geographicae, 31(4), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Działek, J., & Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2014). Young artists and the development of artistic quarters in Polish cities. Belgeo, 3. http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/13012. Last accessed 23 Aug 2019.
  16. 16.
    Integrated urban development in Ukraine—GIZ. https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/39427.html.
  17. 17.
    Riabiko, H., Liakh, V., & Dmytrenko, A. (2011). Blochno-modulna opalubka dlia monolitnoho perekryttia. Patent of Ukraine for utility model No. 59927 dated 10 June 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kontseptsiya intehrovanoho rozvytku mista “Poltava 2030”. http://www.2030.poltava.ua/ua/kontseptsiya-intehrovanoho-rozvytku-mista-2030.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyiv National University of Construction and ArchitectureKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk UniversityPoltavaUkraine

Personalised recommendations