Advertisement

Multi-criteria Group Decision Making in the Selection of CNC Woodworking Machinery

  • Fatma Betul YeniEmail author
  • Mehmet Mustafa Acipayamoglu
  • Emre Cevikcan
Conference paper
  • 24 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)

Abstract

The machine selection process has been an important issue for companies for many years. The wrong selection of the machine leaves a negative result on the efficiency, precision, flexibility, and sensitive production capacity of the company, and this leads to many problems. In this study, a real case application in a company that serves in the wood industry sector is carried out for the process of CNC woodworking machine selection. First, the main criteria and sub-criteria affecting machine selection are defined. For the decision-making process, 3 senior executives of the company are considered as decision-makers (DM). During the evaluation of alternatives under these criteria, the AHP method, one of the most popular Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, is used. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted for a different scenario to see the change in the rankings of alternatives.

Keywords

Analytical hierarchy process Multi-criteria group decision making CNC machine selection 

References

  1. Camci A, Temur GT, Beskese A (2018) CNC router selection for SMEs in woodwork manufacturing using hesitant fuzzy AHP method. J Enterp Inf Manag 31(4):529–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Farhan UH, Tolouei-Rad M, Osseiran A (2016) Use of AHP in decision-making for machine tool configurations. J Manuf Technol Manag 27(6):874–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Karim R, Karmaker CL (2016) Machine selection by AHP and TOPSIS methods. Am J Ind Eng 4(1):7–13.  https://doi.org/10.12691/ajie-4-1-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Özdağoğlu A, Bahar S, Yakut E (2017) Machine selection with fuzzy AHP in a dairy factory. J Manag Econ 24(2):295Google Scholar
  5. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchical process. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Saaty TL, Ergu D (2015) When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 14:1171–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatma Betul Yeni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehmet Mustafa Acipayamoglu
    • 2
  • Emre Cevikcan
    • 3
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering Department, Engineering FacultyKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey
  2. 2.Alternatif Makina Sanayi ve Danişmanlik Hizmetleri Ltd. Şti.IstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Industrial Engineering Department, Management FacultyIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations