Advertisement

Looking into Algorithms to Evolve a Robust Classification of Ultrasound Image of Human Liver Steatosis Using Two Independent Image Sources

  • Nivedita NeogiEmail author
  • Archana Singh
  • Arunabha Adhikari
  • Madhusudan Roy
Conference paper
  • 77 Downloads
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 12)

Abstract

Supervised classification is found to be data specific. A single data set is usually partitioned into training and test subsets usually with several fold cross validation. An ideal classification model trained with exhaustive variation in training examples should work with other similar but unseen data from an independent source. Present authors developed an efficient algorithm to classify fatty liver versus normal liver from ultrasonogram (US) of human liver. In this article it is explored how far that algorithm is applicable for classification of US image obtained from two different sources and how the classification accuracy is affected if two data sets are pooled together. Finally we explore the possibility of training by one source and testing by another source. Idea is to find out a robust algorithm which works in a portable environment.

Keywords

Ultrasound Human liver Data source Classification PSO Anisotropy features 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Suparna Majumdar, Department of Radio diagnosis, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata-700026, India. We would like to thank Dr. Tarun Kumar Roy, Senior Consultant Radiologist, Surakha Diagnostic Center, Phoolbagan, Kolkata-700054, India.

References

  1. 1.
    Ascha, M.S., Hanounch, I.A., Lopez, R., Tamini, T.A.R., Feldstein, A.F., Zein, N.N.: The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 51, 1972–1978 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moldovanu, S., Moraru, L., Bibicu, D.: Computerized decision support in liver steatosis investigation. Int. J. Biol. Biomed. Eng. 6(1), 69–76 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Acharya, U.R., Fujita, H., Sudarshan, V.K., Mookiah, M.R.K., Koh, J.E., Tan, J.H., Hagiwara, Y., Chua, C.K., Junnarkar, S.P., Vijayananthan, A., Ng, K.H.: An integrated index for identification of fatty liver disease using radon transform and discrete cosine transform features in ultrasound images. Inf. Fusion 31, 43–53 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acharya, U.R., Fujita, H., Bhat, S., Raghavendra, U., Gudigar, A., Molinari, F., Vijayananthan, A., Ng, K.H.: Decision support system for fatty liver disease using GIST descriptors extracted from ultrasound images. Inf. Fusion 29, 32–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrade, A., Silva, J.S., Santos, J., Belo-Soares, P.: Classifier approaches for liver steatosis using ultrasound images. Proc. Tech. 5, 763–770 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao, S., Peng, Y., Guo, H., Liu, W., Gao, T., Xu, Y., Tang, X.: texture analysis and classification of ultrasound liver images. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 24(1), 1209–1216 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alivar, A., Danyali, H., Helfroush, M.S.: Hierarchical classification of normal fatty and heterogeneous liver diseases from ultrasound images using serial and parallel feature fusion. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 36(4), 697–707 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acharya, U.R., Raghavendra, U., Fujita, H., Hagiwara, Y., Koh, J.E., Hong, T.J., Sudarshan, V.K., Vijayananthan, A., Yeong, C.H., Gudigar, A., Ng, K.H.: Automated characterization of fatty liver disease and cirrhosis using curvelet transform and entropy features extracted from ultrasound images. Comput. Biol. Med. 79, 250–2508 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neogi, N., Adhikari, A., Roy, M.: Fatty liver identification with novel anisitropy features selected by PSO. J. Image Graph. 6(2), 160–166 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neogi, N., Adhikari, A., Roy, M.: Anisotropy of the texture in the ultra-sonogram of human livers. In: 2016 International Conference on Information Science (ICIS), pp. 114–119. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neogi, N., Adhikari, A., Roy, M.: Use of a novel set of features based on texture anisotropy for identification of liver steatosis from ultrasound images: a simple method. Multimed. Tools Appl. 67(3), 1–23 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tamura, H., Mori, S., Yamawaki, T.: Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 8(6), 460–473 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zucker, S.W., Terzopoulos, D.: Finding structure in co-occurrence matrices for texture analysis. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 12(3), 286–308 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3(6), 610–621 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chetverikov, D.: GLDH based analysis of texture anisotropy and symmetry, an experimental study. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Computer Vision & Image Processing. vol. 1, pp. 444–448 (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehoucq, R., Weiss, J., Dubrulle, B., Amon, A.L., Bouil, A., Crassous, J., Amitranoand, D., Graner, F.: Analysis of image vs position scale and direction reveals pattern texture anisotropy. Front. Phys. 2, 84 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088), 533–536 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mukherjee, S., Adhikari A., Roy, M.: Malignant melanoma classification using cross-platform dataset with deep learning CNN architecture. In: Recent Trends in Signal and Image Processing. AISC, vol. 922, pp. 31–41. Springer, Singapore (2019)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neogi, N., Adhikari, A., Roy, M.: Classification of multisource ultrasonogram image of steatosis. Presented at International Conference on Advanced Informatics for Computing Research (ICAICR), 15–16th June 2019, Simla, India (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nivedita Neogi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Archana Singh
    • 2
  • Arunabha Adhikari
    • 3
  • Madhusudan Roy
    • 4
  1. 1.Meghnad Saha Institute of TechnologyKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and ResearchKolkataIndia
  3. 3.West Bengal State UniversityBarasatIndia
  4. 4.Saha Institute of Nuclear PhysicsKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations