Advertisement

Evaluating Compressive Strength of Concrete Comprising Nano Silica and Marble Dust Using Rebound Hammer Test

  • V. S. KashyapEmail author
  • G. Sancheti
  • K. Arora
  • S. Jain
  • K. Mahale
Conference paper
  • 79 Downloads
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 12)

Abstract

Prediction of concrete strength is imperative for regular valuation of concrete in-situ quality. To elude destructive testing, it is essential to develop consistent predictive models for evaluating the strength using non-destructive (NDT) testing methods. In this work comparison was done between, compressive strength obtained through experimental process and calculated compressive strength using a rebound hammer (RH). For RH test was done on 16 different mix using 48 cubic concrete samples and later their compressive strength was obtained using destructive testing. Various regression models were projected and statistically checked to predict the correlation between compressive strength and rebound number (RN).

Keywords

Nano Silica Marble Dust Non-Destructive Test Rebound Hammer Compressive strength 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial assistance in the form of Enhanced Seed Grant through Endowment Fund No. EF/2017-18/QE04-14 from Manipal University Jaipur for procurement of all the necessary materials and testing of the project. The authors also thank Dr. Gaurav A Bhaduri, Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Mr. Sankalp Gaur, Miss Aprajita Srivastava, Mr. Aditya Lature and Mr. Aneesh Kumar for their active contribution in the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Singh, N., Singh, S.P.: Evaluating the performance of self compacting concretes made with recycled coarse and fine aggregates using non destructive testing techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 181, 73–84 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rashid, K., Waqas, R.: Compressive strength evaluation by non-destructive techniques: an automated approach in construction industry. J. Build. Eng. 12, 147–154 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali-Benyahia, K., Sbartaï, Z.M., Breysse, D., Ghrici, M., Kenai, S.: Improvement of nondestructive assessment of on-site concrete strength: influence of the selection process of cores location on the assessment quality for single and combined NDT techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 195, 613–622 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsioulou, O., Lampropoulos, A., Paschalis, S.: Combined Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) method for the evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC). Constr. Build. Mater. 131, 66–77 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hannachi, S., Guetteche, M.N.: Review of the rebound hammer method estimating concrete compressive strength on site, pp. 118–127 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martínez-Molina, W., et al.: Predicting concrete compressive strength and modulus of rupture using different NDT techniques. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 15 (2014). Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Article ID 742129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/742129
  7. 7.
    Bureau of Indian Standards: IS 8112 Ordinary Portland Cement, 43 Grade Specification (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    BIS: Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete Part IV Mechanical Properties (1963)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Mir, A., Nehme, S.G.: Repeatability of the rebound surface hardness of concrete with alteration of concrete parameters. Constr. Build. Mater. 131, 317–326 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. S. Kashyap
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Sancheti
    • 1
  • K. Arora
    • 1
  • S. Jain
    • 1
  • K. Mahale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringManipal University JaipurJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations