Advertisement

Method for Determining the Residual Resource of Building Structures by the Terms of Their Operation

  • Dmitry KorolkovEmail author
  • Alexander Chernykh
  • Marina Gravit
Conference paper
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 70)

Abstract

This article analyzes the equation for calculating the residual resource of building structures by their age (actual or chronological). The main attention in this article is given to the size of the maximum service life. A number of methods are given for determining the ultimate service life of building structures, their advantages and disadvantages. Based on the analysis, the authors proposed two methods for assigning the final value of the maximum service life. An algorithm has also been developed for the joint assessment of the obtained values of the ultimate service life by various methods. An improvement of the equation for calculating the residual resource by the age of the structures is proposed, which will allow both eliminating the disadvantages that each method individually has and minimizing their negative impact on the accuracy of calculating the residual resource.

Keywords

Service life Residual resource Building constructions Physical wear Concrete strength 

References

  1. 1.
    Erokhina, O.O.: Analysis of publications about the methods of static friction definition for bulk material. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 560, (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/560/1/012014
  2. 2.
    Braila, N.V., Khazieva, K.L., Staritcyna, A.A.: Results of technical inspection monitoring of the operation object. Mag. Civ. Eng. 74(6), 70–77 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.74.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soldatenko, V.S., Smagin, V.A., Gusenitsa, Y.N., Gera, V.I., Soldatenko, T.N.: The method of calculation for the period of checking utility systems. Mag. Civ. Eng. 70(2), 72–83 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.70.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Volkov, M., Kibkalo, A., Vodolagina, A., Murgul, V.: Existing models residual life assessment of structures and their comparative analysis. Procedia Eng. 165, 1801–1805 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Ansari, M.S.: Reliability and flexural behavior of triangular and T-reinforced concrete beams. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 7(4), 377–386 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-015-0106-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aven, T.: Interpretations of alternative uncertainty representations in a reliability and risk analysis context. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96(3), 353–360 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aven, T., Zio, E.: Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96, 64–74 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suo, B., Zeng, C., Cheng, Y.S., Li, J.: An evidence theory-based algorithm for system reliability evaluation under mixed Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15(3–4), 189–196 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2012-0050MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang, C., Zhang, Z., Han, X., Liu, J.: A novel evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method for structures with epistemic uncertainty. Comput. Struct. 129, 1–12 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, H., Nie, X.: Structural reliability analysis with fuzzy random variables using error principle. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 67, 91–99 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.08.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiao, N.C., Huang, H.Z., Li, Y.F., Wang, Z., Zhang, X.L.: Non-probabilistic reliability sensitivity analysis of the model of structural systems with s interval variables whose state of dependence is determined by constrains. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part 06: J. Risk Reliab. 227(5), 491–498 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x13480742
  12. 12.
    Utkin, L.V., Kozine, I.: On new cautious structural reliability models in the framework of imprecise probabilities. Struct. Saf. 32(6), 411–416 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Y.: Imprecise probabilities based on generalized intervals for system reliability assessment. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 4(4), 319–342 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2010.035572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krejsa, M., Janas, P., Krejsa, V.: Structural reliability analysis using DOProC method. Procedia Eng. 142, 34–41 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caspeele, R., Sykora, M., Taerwe, L.: Influence of quality control of concrete on structural reliability: assessment using a Bayesian approach. Mater. Struct./Mater. Constr. 47(1–2), 105–116 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0048-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    State Standard of Russia. RD EO 0447-03 Methodology for assessing the state and residual life of reinforced concrete structures of nuclear power plants, important for safetyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    RD EO 0462-03 Methodology for substantiating the service life of building structures, buildings and structures of nuclear power plants. Updated edition. It was put into effect by the order of “Rosenergoatom Concern” dated 10 June 2015 No. 9/601-PGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    State Standard of Russia. Recommendations for assessing the reliability of building structures of buildings and structures by external signs (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Belyaev, S.: Calculation of the residual resource of buildings taking into account the stock of bearing capacity of structures. Vestn. SGASU. Town Plan. Arch. 3, 22–25 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.17673/vestnik.2013.03.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganiev, I.G.: Calculation of safe working time of superstructures by the amount of accumulated wear. Science and transport progress. Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, vol. 21, pp. 105–106 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Korolkov, D.I., Korolkov, D.D.: Identification of patterns and description of the dependence of the value of theresidual resource from the chronological (actual) age of building structures. Eurasian Sci. J., 2(11), (2019)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Korolkov, D.I., Korolkov, D.D.: The method of calculating the residual life of building structures by their age (actual or chronological). Eurasian Sci. J. 3(11) (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitry Korolkov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander Chernykh
    • 1
  • Marina Gravit
    • 2
  1. 1.Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil EngineeringSt. PetersburgRussian Federation
  2. 2.Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversitySt. PetersburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations