Advertisement

Creating and Maintaining Play Connection in a Toddler Peer Group

  • Annukka PursiEmail author
  • Lasse Lipponen
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 30)

Abstract

This study explores how one and two year old peers (henceforth toddlers) participate in joint play activities in a natural group-care setting. We focus on joint play activity between three toddler peers during one full day-care day in a Finnish toddler classroom. Questions guiding the analysis concern the sequential understanding of how play emerges within peer interaction and how toddler peers are able to build sustained co-participation in their joint play during the day. The analysis showed that joint play was fragmented and organized in short segments of dyadic or triadic interaction. Re-establishments of joint play and accumulation of significant play signals during the day were important practices for toddlers to constitute social organization and sustained co-participation in their multi-party peer play. The results strengthen our understanding of very young children as both more and less competent play companions in their peer groups and guide adults’ practice in relation to peer play in toddler classrooms.

Keywords

Play Joint activity Peer interaction Co-participation Toddler 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank first of all Venla, Niilo and Ella for their playful moments that inspired this work. We are also thankful to all the parents and ECE practitioners for their cooperation. For comments and discussions we are most grateful to Marjatta Kalliala and Nina Sajaniemi.

References

  1. Bateman, A. (2015). Conversation analysis and early childhood education: The co-production of knowledge and relationships, (Doing pretend play, 4) (pp. 41–66). Hampshire: Ashgate/ Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1976). A theory of play and fantasy. In J. S. B. A. Jolly & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play – Its role in development and evolution (pp. 119–129). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd..Google Scholar
  3. Björk-Willén, P. (2007). Participation in multilingual preschool play: Shadowing and crossing as interactional resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2133–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corsaro, W. A., & Molinari, L. (1990). From seggiolini to discussione: The generation and extension of peer culture among Italian preschool children. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(3), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engdahl, I. (2011). Toddler interaction during play in the Swedish preschool. Early Development and Care, 181(10), 1421–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farver, J. A. M. (1992). Communicating shared meaning in social pretend play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunnarsdottir, B., & Bateman, A. (2017). Toddler agency and conversation analysis. Early Childhood Folio, 21(1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison, L. J., & Sumsion, J. (2014). Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care. Exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansson, E., & White, E. J. (2011). Educational research with our youngest. In Voices of infants and toddlers. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Kalliala, M. (2014). Toddlers as both more and less competent social actors in Finnish day care centres. Early Years, 34(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kidwell, M. (2009). Gaze shifts as an interactional resource for very young children. Discourse Processes, 46, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kidwell, M. (2013). Availability as a trouble source in directive-response sequences. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 234–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Li, L., Quinones, G. G., & Ridgway, A. (Eds.). (2017). Studying babies and toddlers: Relationships in cultural contexts. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Løkken, G. (2000). The playful quality of the toddling “style”. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Løkken, G. (2011). Lived experience as an observer among toddlers. In E. Johansson & E. J. White (Eds.), Educational research with our youngest: Voices of infants and toddlers (pp. 161–184). Dordrecht: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievements of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pursi, A., & Lipponen, L. (2018). Constituting play connection with very young children: Adults’ active participation in play. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 17, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pursi, A., Lipponen, L., & Sajaniemi, N. (2018). Emotional and playful stance taking in joint play between adults and very young children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rayna, S., & Laevers, F. (2011). Understanding children from 0 to 3 years of age and its implications for education. What’s new on the babies’ side? Origins and evolutions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(2), 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ridgway, A., Li, L., & Quiñones, G. (2016). Visual narrative methodology in educational research with babies: Triadic play in babies’ room. The Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy (VJEP): Springer Open Journal.Google Scholar
  24. Sidnell, J. (2009). Participation. In S. D’hondt, J.-O. Ostman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), The pragmatics of interaction (pp. 125–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singer, E., & Hännikäinen, M. (2002). The teacher’s role in territorial conflicts of 2- to 3-year-old children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 17(1), 5–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stambak, M., & Verba, M. (1986). Organization of social play among toddlers: An ecological approach. In E. Mueller & C. Cooper (Eds.), Peer relations: Process and outcome (pp. 229–247). Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2016). Proposals for activity collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(2), 148–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trevarthen, C., & Delafield-Butt, J. (2017). Intersubjectivity in the imagination and feeling of the infant: Implications for education in the early years. In J. White & C. Dalli (Eds.), Under-three years olds in policy and practice (pp. 17–40). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White, E. J., & Dalli, C. (Eds.). (2017). Under-three year olds in policy and practice. Policy and Pedagogy with Under-three Year Olds. Cross-disciplinary insights and innovations. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations