Advertisement

Digital Peer Play: Meta-imaginary Play Embedded in Early Childhood Play-Based Settings

  • Marilyn FleerEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 30)

Abstract

Digital childhood captures the everydayness of children growing up in many European and European heritage communities (Danby et al., Digital childhood. Springer, Amsterdam, 2018), where young children’s engagement with digital devices (Arnott, Digital technologies and learning in the early years. Sage, London. ISBN 978-1-41296-242-1, 2017) has become normalised. Despite the arguments for both positive and negative dimensions of increasing screen time (Walker et al., Use of digital technologies and cognitive self-regulation in young children. Findings from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. In: Danby S, Fleer M, Davidson C, Hatzigianni M (eds) Digital childhood, Springer, Amsterdam, 2018), little attention has been directed to how peers play together in early childhood settings where digital devices, such as touch screen tablets and animation apps, are being introduced. This chapter follows a group of 24 children (1.6–5.3; mean age 3.5 years) and their teachers (n = 10; 23.5 h of video observations) engaged in imaginary play (Hakkarainen et al., Eur Early Childhood Edu Res J 21(2):213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789189, 2013). The study found that digital meta-imaginary peer play situations appeared within the holistic context of peer-initiated play and adult-initiated play inquiry. The key drivers of this holistic conception of digital peer play featured digital placeholders and virtual pivots, and this dynamic evolved over time as the adults became players to support play development and as children became narrators of the digital play.

Keywords

Cultural-historical Playworlds Conceptual playworld STEM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study reported in this chapter was supported through an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (ARC DP130101438). The research assistance of Shukla Sikder (field research leader), Sue March, Feiyan Chen, Anamika Devi, and Selena (Yijun) Hao, and data organisation by Freya Fleer-Stout, are acknowledged. Last but not least, is the contribution of the teachers who actively designed and implemented the innovative teaching program that this chapter discusses.

References

  1. Arnott, L. (Ed.). (2017). Digital technologies and learning in the early years. London: Sage. ISBN 978-1-41296-242-1.Google Scholar
  2. Brooker, L., Blaise, M., & Edwards, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Sage Handbook on play and learning in early childhood. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Danby, S., Fleer, M., Davidson, C., & Hatzigianni, M. (Eds.). (2018). Digital childhood. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Department of Education and Training. (2016). Victorian early years learning and development framework. Victorian Government: East Melbourne.Google Scholar
  5. Fleer, M. (2014). Theorising play in the early years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fleer, M. (2015). Pedagogical positioning in play – Teachers being inside and outside of children’s imaginary play. Early Child Development and Care, 184(11–12), 1801–1814.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1028393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleer, M., & Ridgway, A. (Eds.). (2014). Digital visual methodologies: Theorising researching with children. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Hakkarainen, P., Bredikyte, M., Jakkula, K., & Munter, H. (2013). Adult play guidance and children’s play development in a narrative play-world. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hedegaard, M. (2008). Principles for interpreting research protocols. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying Children. A cultural-historical approach (pp. 46–64). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hedegaard, M. (2014). The significance of demands and motives across practices in children’s learning and development. An analysis of learning in home and school. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3, 188–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kravtsov, G. G., & Kravtsova, E. E. (2010). Play in L.S. Vygotsky’s non-classical psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(4), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kravtsova, E. E. (2009). The cultural-historical foundations of the zone of proximal development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(6), 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405470501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, R., Fleer, M., & Hammer, M. (2019). Intentional teaching: Can early childhood educators create the conditions for children’s conceptual development when following an interest based program? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(1), 6–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939/19841470.
  15. Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., & Scott, F. (2016). Digital play: A new classification. Early Years, 36(3), 242–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1167675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nilsson, M., Ferholt, B., & Lecusay, R. (2017). The playing-exploring child: Reconceptualizing the relationship between play and learning in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Nuttall, J., Edwards, S., Lee, S., Mantilla, A., & Wood, E. (2013). The implications of young children’s digital consumerist play for changing the kindergarten curriculum. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2, 54–63.Google Scholar
  18. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2007). Creativity, communication and collaboration: The identification of pedagogic progression in sustained shared thinking in Asia-Pacific. Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 1(2), 3–23.Google Scholar
  19. Theobald, M., Danby, S., Davidson, C., Houen, S., Scriven, B., & Thorpe, K. (2016). How talk and interaction unfold in a digitally enabled preschool classroom. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36(2), 189–204.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1121530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Verenikina, I., Dervin, L., Rivera, M., & C and Lidbetter A. (2016). Digital play: Exploring young children’s perspectives on applications designed for preschoolers. Global Studies of Childhood, 10, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2043510616676036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy Psikhologii, 12(6), 62–76.Google Scholar
  22. Walker, S., Danby, S., & Hatzigianni, M. (2018). Use of digital technologies and cognitive self-regulation in young children. Findings from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. In S. Danby, M. Fleer, C. Davidson, & M. Hatzigianni (Eds.), Digital childhood. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations