Advertisement

Victimology pp 359-379 | Cite as

A Theory of Injustice and Victims’ Participation in Criminal Processes

  • Antony PembertonEmail author
Chapter
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter sees the author develop a ‘theory of injustice’ that will provide the basis for a victimological perspective on justice processes. The chapter commences with some reflections on the consequence of viewing justice and injustice as poles of one dimension. As the author exposes his theory of injustice, he argues that the issue at stake is the manner in which this theory connects to victim’s participation in justice processes and criminal proceedings. Acknowledging that victims need to communicate their experience in justice processes, Pemberton casts doubt on the extent to which this is best understood in terms of reducing their stress symptoms: becoming less anxious or changing the sentence. He proposes that the justice process itself can be an important site for reconnection: of victim experience with society and with important symbols of shared values. This critical stance has some degree of synergy with the restorative justice perspective and central to his proposition is the need to understand that injustice concerns a relationship of victim with his or her self, rather than a relationship with other persons. The second requirement is to appreciate that this self is only accurately understood if it is conceived as being-in-the-world. Only then does the experience of injustice come into its own—when it amounts to an ontological assault. The arguments put forward in this chapter require a fundamental re-think about the way we experience our victimisation and by implication, the traditional ways in which we have come to think about activism.

References

  1. Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, J. M. (2015). Torture and Dignity: An Essay on Moral Injury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brison, S. J. (2002). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of the Self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, M. (2000). On the Rejection of Morality: Bernard Williams’ Debt to Nietzsche. In R. Schacht (Ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (pp. 100–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crossley, M. L. (2000). Narrative Psychology, Trauma and the Study of Self/Identity. Theory & Psychology, 10, 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, F. D. (1997). Phronesis, Clinical Reasoning and Pellegrino’s Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine, 18, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman, M. (2000). When the Story’s Over: Narrative Foreclosure and the Possibility of Self-renewal. In M. Andrews, S. D. Sclater, C. Squire, & A. Treacher (Eds.), Lines of Narrative: Psychosocial Perspectives (pp. 81–91). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadow, S. (1980). Existential Advocacy: Philosophical Foundation of Nursing. In S. Spicker & S. Gadow (Eds.), Nursing Images and Ideals: Opening Dialogue with the Humanities (pp. 79–101). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Garro, L. C. (1992). Chronic Illness and the Construction of Narratives. In M. J. D. Good, P. E. Brodwin, B. J. Good, & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective (pp. 100–137). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goodey, J. (2005). Victims and Victimology. Research, Policy, Practice. Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
  12. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Levi, P. (1988). The Drowned and the Saved. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  14. Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  15. Nietzsche, F. (1888/1967). On the Genealogy of Morals (R. J. Hollingdale & W. Kaufman, Trans.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Nussbaum, M. (1990, 26 November). The Misfortune Teller. The New Republic, pp. 30–32.Google Scholar
  17. Pellegrino, E. D. (1979). Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality: The Primacy of the Act of Profession and the Fact of Illness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4, 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pemberton, A. (2009). Victim Movements: From Varying Needs to Diversified Criminal Justice Agenda’s. Acta Criminologica, 22, 1–23.Google Scholar
  19. Pemberton, A. (2015). Victimology with a Hammer: The Challenge of Victimology. Tilburg: Prismaprint.Google Scholar
  20. Pemberton, A., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2017). Judith Shklar’s Victimology and Restorative Justice. In I. Aertsen & B. Pali (Eds.), Criticial Restorative Justice (pp. 315–330). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  21. Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M., & Mulder, E. (2017). Beyond Retribution, Restoration and Procedural Justice: The Big Two of Communion and Agency in Victims’ Perspectives on Justice. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23(7), 682–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pemberton, A., Mulder, E., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2019). Stories of Injustice: Towards a Narrative Victimology. European Journal of Criminology, 16(4), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of Being. Phenomenology, Psychiatry and the Sense of Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ratcliffe, M. (2012). The Phenomenology of Existential Feeling. In J. Fingerhut & S. Marienburg (Eds.), Feelings of Being Alive (pp. 23–54). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  25. Ratcliffe, M. (2017). Real Hallucinations. Psychiatric Illness, Intentionality and the Interpersonal World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ratcliffe, M., Ruddel, M., & Smith, B. (2014). What Is a Sense of Foreshortened Future? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, P. (1986). Life: A Story in Search of a Narrator. In M. Doeser & J. Kray (Eds.), Facts and Values (pp. 34–68). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  28. Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review. Emotion Review, 1, 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scheingold, S., Olson, T., & Pershing, J. (1994). Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy and Republican Criminology: Washington’s Community Protection Act. Law and Society Review, 28(4), 729–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sebold, A. (1999). Lucky. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  31. Shklar, J. (1986). Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Shklar, J. (1990). The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Strang, H. (2002). Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Walgrave, L. (2008). Restorative Justice, Self-interest and Responsible Citizenship. Cullumpton, Devon, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
  35. Wemmers, J. M. (1996). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. The Hague: The Netherlands, WODC/Kugler.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, B. (1993). Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: CA. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Winkler, C. (1991). Rape as Social Murder. Anthropology Today, 7(3), 12–14.Google Scholar
  38. Wolgast, E. (1987). The Grammar of Justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Yack, B. (1999). Putting Injustice First. Social Research, 66, 1103–1120.Google Scholar
  40. Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale: Herald Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LINC, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.NSCRAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations