Advertisement

Thermal Hysteresis

  • Erlend KristiansenEmail author
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Antifreeze (glyco)proteins, AF(G)Ps, are defined by their shared ability to prevent ice crystals from growing in supercooled solutions. They are categorized as being either moderately active or hyperactive. The distinct difference in antifreeze potency between these two categories is accompanied by distinct shapes of the ice crystals that are being stabilized in their presence; moderately active AF(G)Ps cause bipyramidal crystals to develop, a shape that only exposes a single crystal plane to the surrounding solution. In the presence of hyperactive AF(G)Ps, ice crystals express several crystal planes. A number of different factors affect their potency as antifreeze agents, from large organic macromolecules to inorganic ions. This chapter outlines current understanding of the modus operandi of AF(G)Ps. Attempts are made to provide some simple explanations to the antifreeze potency of AF(G)Ps, including their characteristics as moderately active or hyperactive, and how their antifreeze potency is affected by different factors. The different potencies of moderately and hyperactive AF(G)Ps are ascribed to differences in their adsorption habits. Effects of additives or molecular size on their potencies are ascribed to variations in protein solubility, induced by variations in molecular size or evoked by the presence of additives. Experimental proof of concept is discussed in the context of basic solubility theory. Some characteristics of ice-nucleating agents (INAs) in relation to AF(G)Ps and their relevance in cold tolerance is also briefly examined.

Keywords

Thermal hysteresis Antifreeze activity Kelvin effect Critical radius Hyperactive Hyperactivity Protein size Protein solubility Hofmeister series Additive Enhancement Adsorption Desorption Heterogeneous nucleation Ice nucleator Ice nucleating agent 

References

  1. Amornwittawat N, Wang S, Duman JG, Wen X (2008) Polycarboxylates enhance beetle antifreeze protein activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1784:1942–1948PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Amornwittawat N, Wang S, Banatlao J, Chung M, Velasco E, Duman JG, Wen X (2009) Effects of polyhydroxy compounds on beetle antifreeze protein activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1794:341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baardsnes J, Kuiper MJ, Davies PL (2003) Antifreeze protein dimer. When two ice binding faces are better than one. J Biol Chem 278:38942–38947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bull HB, Breese K (1974) Surface tension of amino acid solutions: a hydrophobicity scale of amino acid residues. Arch Biochem Biophys 161:665–670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Can O, Holland NB (2011) Conjugation of type I antifreeze protein to polyallylamine increases thermal hysteresis activity. Bioconjug Chem 22:2166–2171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Can O, Holland NB (2013) Utilizing avidity to improve antifreeze protein activity: a type III antifreeze protein trimer exhibits increased thermal hysteresis activity. Biochemistry 52:8745–8752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caple G, Kerr WL, Burcham TS, Osuga DT, Yeh Y, Feeney RE (1986) Superadditive effects in mixtures of fish antifreeze glycoproteins and polyalcohols or surfactants. J Colloid Interface Sci 111:299–304Google Scholar
  8. Celik Y, Graham LA, Mok Y-F, Bar M, Davies PL, Braslavsky I (2010) Superheating of ice crystals in antifreeze protein solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5423–5428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Celik Y, Drori R, Pertaya-Braun N, Altan A, Barton T, Bar-Dolev M, Groisman A, Davies PL, Braslavsky I (2013) Microfluidic experiments reveal that antifreeze proteins bound to ice crystals suffice to prevent their growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:1309–1314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakraborty S, Jana B (2019) Ordered hydration layer mediated ice adsorption of a globular antifreeze protein: mechanistic insight. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:19298–19310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chalmers B (1964) Principles of solidification. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Chao H, DeLuca CL, Davies PL (1995) Mixing antifreeze protein types changes ice crystal morphology without affecting antifreeze activity. FEBS Lett 357:183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chao H, Hodges RS, Kay CM, Gauthier SY, Davies PL (1996) A natural variant of Type I antifreeze protein with four ice-binding repeats is a particularly potent antifreeze. Protein Sci 5:1150–1155PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohn EJ (1925) The physical chemistry of the proteins. Physiol Rev 5:349–437Google Scholar
  15. Cziko PA, DeVries AL, Evans CW, Cheng C-HC (2014) Antifreeze protein-induced superheating of ice inside Antarctic notothenioid fishes inhibits melting during summer warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:14583–14588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. DeLuca CI, Comley R, Davies PL (1998) Antifreeze proteins bind independently to ice. Biophys J 74:1502–1508PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. DeVries AL (1971) Glycoproteins as biological antifreeze agents in Antarctic fishes. Science 172:1152–1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DeVries AL (1982) Biological antifreeze agents in Coldwater fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol A 73:627–640Google Scholar
  19. Drori R, Davies PL, Braslavsky I (2015) Experimental correlation between thermal hysteresis activity and the distance between antifreeze proteins on an ice surface. RSC Adv 5:7848–7853Google Scholar
  20. Duman JG (2001) Antifreeze and ice nucleator proteins in terrestrial arthropods. Annu Rev Physiol 63:327–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Duman JG (2002) The inhibition of ice nucleators by insect antifreeze proteins is enhanced by glycerol and citrate. J Comp Physiol B 172:163–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Duman JG, Bennett V, Sformo T, Hochstrasser R, Barnes BM (2004) Antifreeze proteins in Alaskan insects and spiders. J Insect Physiol 50:259–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans PE, Hobbs RS, Goddard SV, Fletcher GL (2007) The importance of dissolved salts to the in vivo efficacy of antifreeze proteins. Comp Biochem Physiol A 148:556–561Google Scholar
  24. Felder CE, Prilusky J, Silman I, Sussman JL (2007) A server and database for dipole moments of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W512–W521. http://dipole.weizmann.ac.il/
  25. Fletcher GL, Hew CL, Davies PL (2001) Antifreeze proteins in teleost fishes. Annu Rev Physiol 63:359–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Friis DS, Kristiansen E, von Solms N, Ramløv H (2014) Antifreeze activity enhancement by site directed mutagenesis on an antifreeze protein from the beetle Rhagium mordax. FEBS Lett 588:1767–1772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Garnham CP, Campbell RL, Davies PL (2011a) Anchored clathrate waters bind antifreeze proteins to ice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:7363–7367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Garnham CP, Campbell RL, Walker VK, Davies PL (2011b) Novel dimeric β-helical model of an ice nucleation protein with bridged active sites. BMC Struct Biol 11:36PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Gekko K, Timasheff SN (1981) Mechanism of protein stabilization by glycerol: preferential hydration in glycerol-water mixtures. Biochemistry 20:4667–4676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gong HS, Croft K, Driedzic WR, Ewart VK (2011) Chemical chaperoning action of glycerol on the antifreeze protein of rainbow smelt. J Therm Biol 36:78–83Google Scholar
  31. Graether SP, Jia Z (2001) Modeling Pseudomonas syringae ice-nucleation protein as a β-helical protein. Biophys J 80:1169–1173PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Graether SP, Kuiper MJ, Gagné SM, Walker VK, Jia Z, Sykes BD, Davies PL (2000) β-helix structure and ice-binding properties of a hyperactive antifreeze protein from an insect. Nature 406:325–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Graham LA, Davies PL (2005) Glycine-rich antifreeze proteins from snow fleas. Science 310:461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grandum S, Yabe A, Nakagomi K, Tanaka M, Takemura F, Kobayashi Y, Frivik P-E (1999) Analysis of ice crystal growth for a crystal surface containing adsorbed antifreeze proteins. J Cryst Growth 205:382–390Google Scholar
  35. Hakim A, Nguyen JB, Basu K, Zhu DF, Thakral D, Davies PL, Isaacs FJ, Modis Y, Meng W (2013) Crystal structure of an insect antifreeze protein and its implications for ice binding. J Biol Chem 288:12295–12304PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen TN, Baust JG (1988) Serial dilution of Tenebrio molitor haemolymph: analysis of antifreeze activity by differential scanning calorimetry. Cryo-Letters 9:386–391Google Scholar
  37. Hansen TN, DeVries AL, Baust JG (1991) Calorimetric analysis of antifreeze glycoproteins of the polar fish, Dissostichus mawsoni. Biochim Biophys Acta 1079:169–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Haymet ADJ, Ward LG, Harding MM, Knight CA (1998) Valine substituted winter flounder ‘antifreeze’: preservation of ice growth hysteresis. FEBS Lett 430:301–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Haymet ADJ, Ward LG, Harding MM (1999) Winter flounder “antifreeze” proteins: synthesis and ice growth inhibition of analogues that probe the relative importance of hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions. J Am Chem Soc 121:941–948Google Scholar
  40. Hayward JA, Haymet ADJ (2001) The ice/water interface: molecular dynamics simulations of the basal, prism, 2021 and 2110 interfaces of ice Ih. J Chem Phys 114:3713–3726Google Scholar
  41. Holland NB, Nishimiya Y, Tsuda S, Sönnichsen FD (2008) Two domains of RD3 antifreeze protein diffuse independently. Biochemistry 47:3955–3941Google Scholar
  42. Horwath KL, Easton CM, Poggioli GJ Jr, Myers K, Schnorr IL (1996) Tracking the profile of a specific antifreeze protein and its contribution to the thermal hysteresis activity in cold hardy insects. Eur J Entomol 93:419–433Google Scholar
  43. Jia Z, Davies PL (2002) Antifreeze proteins: an unusual receptor-ligand interaction. Trends Biochem Sci 27:101–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaushik JK, Bhat R (1998) Thermal stability of proteins in aqueous polyol solutions: role of the surface tension of water in the stabilizing effect of polyols. J Phys Chem B 102:7058–7066Google Scholar
  45. Kerr WL, Burcham TS, Osuga DT, Yeh Y, Feeney RE (1985) Synergistic depression of the freezing temperature in solutions of polyhydroxy compounds and antifreeze glycoproteins. Cryo-Letters 6:107–114Google Scholar
  46. Knight CA, DeVries AL (1988) The prevention of ice crystal growth from water by “antifreeze proteins”. In: Wagner PE, Vali G (eds) Atmospheric aerosols and nucleation. Lecture notes in physics 309. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  47. Knight CA, DeVries AL (1989) Melting inhibition and superheating of ice by an antifreeze glycopeptide. Science 245:505–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Knight CA, Cheng CC, DeVries AL (1991) Adsorption of α-helical antifreeze peptides on specific ice crystal surface planes. Biophys J 59:409–418PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Knight CA, Driggers E, DeVries AL (1993) Adsorption to ice of fish antifreeze glycopeptides 7 and 8. Biophys J 64:252–259PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Kobashigawa Y, Nishimiya Y, Miura K, Ohgiya S, Miura A, Tsuda S (2005) A part of ice nucleation protein exhibits the ice-binding ability. FEBS Lett 579:1493–1497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kozloff LM, Turner MA, Arellano F, Lute M (1991) Phosphatidylinositol, a phospholipid of ice-nucleating bacteria. J Bacteriol 173:2053–2060PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Kristiansen E, Zachariassen KE (2005) The mechanism by which fish antifreeze proteins cause thermal hysteresis. Cryobiology 51:262–280Google Scholar
  53. Kristiansen E, Pedersen SA, Zachariassen KE (2008) Salt-induced enhancement of antifreeze protein activity: a salting-out effect. Cryobiology 57:122–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Landt E (1931) The surface tension of solutions of various sugars. Z Ver Dtsch Zucher-Ind 81:119–124Google Scholar
  55. Laursen RA, Wen D, Knight CA (1994) Enantioselective adsorption of the D- and L-forms of an α-helical antifreeze polypeptide to the {2021} planes of ice. J Am Chem Soc 116:12057–12058Google Scholar
  56. Leinala EK, Davies PL, Doucet D, Tyshenko MG, Walker VK, Jia Z (2002) β-Helical antifreeze protein isoform with increased activity. J Biol Chem 277:33349–33352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Li N, Andorfer C, Duman JG (1998) Enhancement of insect antifreeze protein activity by solutes of low molecular mass. J Exp Biol 201:2243–2251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Liou YC, Tocilj A, Davies PL, Jia Z (2000) Mimicry of ice structure by surface hydroxyls and water of a beta-helix antifreeze protein. Nature 406:322–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu K, Jia Z, Chen G, Tung C, Liu R (2005) Systematic size study of an insect antifreeze protein and its interaction with ice. Biophys J 88:953–958PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu Z, Li H, Pang H, Me J, Mao X (2015) Enhancement effect of solutes of low molecular mass on the insect antifreeze protein ApAFP752 from Anatolica polita. J Therm Anal Calorim 120:307–315Google Scholar
  61. Lu K, Li Y (1998) Homogeneous nucleation catastrophe as a kinetic stability limit for superheated crystal. Phys Rev Lett 80:4474–4477Google Scholar
  62. Marshall CB, Tomczak MM, Gauthier SY, Kuiper MJ, Lankin C, Walker VK, Davies PL (2004a) Partitioning of fish and insect antifreeze proteins into ice suggests they bind with comparable affinity. Biochemistry 43:148–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Marshall CB, Daley ME, Sykes BD, Davies PL (2004b) Enhancing the activity of a β-helical antifreeze protein by the engineered addition of coils. Biochemistry 43:11637–11646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Matubayasi N, Nishiyama A (2006) Thermodynamic quantities of surface formation of aqueous electrolyte solutions VI. Comparison with typical nonelectrolytes, sucrose and glucose. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:910–913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Melander W, Horváth C (1977) Salt effects on hydrophobic interactions in precipitation and chromatography of proteins: an interpretation of the lyotropic series. Arch Biochem Biophys 183:200–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Miura K, Ohgiya S, Hoshino T, Nemoto N, Suetake T, Miura A, Spyracopoulos L, Kondo H, Tsuda S (2001) NMR analysis of Type III antifreeze protein intramolecular dimer. Structural basis for enhanced activity. J Biol Chem 276:1304–1310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mok Y-F, Lin F-H, Graham LA, Celik Y, Braslavsky I, Davies PL (2010) Structural basis for the superior activity of the large isoform of snow flea antifreeze protein. Biochemistry 49:2593–2603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Neven LG, Duman JG, Beals JM, Castellino FJ (1986) Overwintering adaptations of the stag beetle, Ceruchus piceus: removal of ice nucleators in winter to promote supercooling. J Comp Physiol B 156:707–716Google Scholar
  69. Neven L, Duman JG, Low MG, Sehl LC, Castellino FJ (1989) Purification and characterization of an insect hemolymph lipoprotein ice nucleator: evidence for the importance of phosphatidylinositol and apolipoprotein in the ice nucleator activity. J Comp Physiol B 159:71–82Google Scholar
  70. Nishimiya Y, Ohgiya S, Tsuda S (2003) Artificial multimers of the type III antifreeze protein. Effects on thermal hysteresis and ice crystal morphology. J Biol Chem 278:32307–32312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Nishimiya Y, Sato R, Takamichi M, Miura A, Tsuda S (2005) Co-operative effect of the isoforms of type III antifreeze protein expressed in Notched-fin eelpout, Zoarces elongatus Kner. FEBS J 272:482–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Olsen TM, Duman JG (1997a) Maintenance of the supercooled state in overwintering pyrochroid beetle larvae, Dendroides canadensis: role of hemolymph ice nucleators and antifreeze proteins. J Comp Physiol B 167:105–113Google Scholar
  73. Olsen TM, Duman JG (1997b) Maintenance of the supercooled state in the gut fluid of overwintering pyrochroid beetle larvae, Dendroides canadensis: role of ice nucleators and antifreeze proteins. J Comp Physiol B 167:114–122Google Scholar
  74. Olsen TM, Sass SJ, Li N, Duman JG (1998) Factors contributing to seasonal increases in inoculative freezing resistance in overwintering fire-colored beetle larvae Dendroides canandensis (Pyrochroidae). J Exp Biol 201:1585–1594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Pertaya N, Marshall CB, DiPrinzio CL, Wilen L, Thomson ES, Wettlaufer JS, Davies PL, Braslavsky I (2007) Fluorescence microscopy evidence for quasi-permanent attachment of antifreeze proteins to ice surfaces. Biophys J 92:3663–3673PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Pertaya N, Marshall CB, Celik Y, Davies PL, Braslavsky I (2008) Direct visualization of spruce budworm antifreeze protein interacting with ice crystals: basal plane affinity confers hyperactivity. Biophys J 95:333–341PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Poynting JH (1881) Change of state: solid–liquid. Philos Mag 5th series 12:32–48Google Scholar
  78. Ramsay JA (1964) The rectal complex of the mealworm Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Philos Trans R Soc B 348:279–314Google Scholar
  79. Raymond JA, DeVries AL (1977) Adsorption inhibition as a mechanism of freezing resistance in polar fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74:2589–2593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Reynolds JA, Gilbert DB, Tanford C (1974) Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. Proc Natl Acad Sci 71:2925–2927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Schrag JD, O’Grady SM, DeVries AL (1982) Relationship of amino acid composition and molecular weight of antifreeze glycopeptides to non-colligative freezing point depression. Biochim Biophys Acta 717:322–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Sönnichsen FD, DeLuca CI, Davies PL, Sykes BD (1996) Refined solution structure of type III antifreeze protein: hydrophobic groups may be involved in the energetics of the protein-ice interaction. Structure 4:1325–1337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Sørensen TF, Ramløv H (2001) Variations in antifreeze activity and serum inorganic ions in the eelpout Zoarces viviparus: antifreeze activity in the embryonic state. Comp Biochem Physiol A 30:123–132Google Scholar
  84. Stevens CA, Drori R, Zalis S, Braslavsky I, Davies PL (2015) Dendrimer-linked antifreeze proteins have superior activity and thermal recovery. Bioconjug Chem 26:1908–1915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Thomson W (1871) On the equilibrium of vapour at a curved surface of liquid. Philos Mag 42:448–452Google Scholar
  86. Tolls J, van Dijk J, Verbruggen EJM, Hermens JLM, Loeprecht B, Schüürmann G (2002) Aqueous solubility-molecular size relationships: a mechanistic case study using C10- to C19-alkanes. J Phys Chem A 106:2760–2765Google Scholar
  87. Turnbull D (1950) Kinetics of heterogenous nucleation. J Chem Phys 18:198–203Google Scholar
  88. Uhlig HH (1937) The solubilities of gases and surface tension. J Phys Chem 41:1215–1225Google Scholar
  89. Wang L, Duman JG (2005) Antifreeze proteins of the beetle Dendroides canadensis enhance one another’s activities. Biochemistry 44:10305–10312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Wang L, Duman JG (2006) A thaumatin-like protein from larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis enhances the activity of antifreeze proteins. Biochemistry 45:1278–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang S, Amornwittawat N, Banatlao J, Chung M, Kao Y, Wen X (2009a) Hofmeister effects of common monovalent salts on the beetle antifreeze protein activity. J Phys Chem B 113:13891–13894PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang S, Amornwittawat N, Juwita V, Kao Y, Duman JG, Pascal TA, Goddard WA, Wen X (2009b) Arginine, a key residue for the enhancing ability of an antifreeze protein of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. Biochemistry 48:9696–9703PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Washburn EW (1929) International critical tables of numerical data, physics, chemistry and technology, vol 4. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Wen D, Laursen RA (1992) A model for binding of an antifreeze polypeptide to ice. Biophys J 63:1659–1662PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Wen X, Wang S, Amornwittawat N, Houghton EA, Sacco MA (2011) Interaction of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide with an antifreeze protein from Dendroides canadensis: mechanistic implication of antifreeze activity enhancement. J Mol Recognit 24:1025–1032PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Westh HP, Ramløv H, Wilson PW, DeVries AL (1997) Vapor pressure of aqueous antifreeze glycopeptide solutions. Cryo-Letters 18:277–282Google Scholar
  97. Wilson PW (1993) Explaining thermal hysteresis by the Kelvin effect. Cryo-Letters 14:31–36Google Scholar
  98. Wilson PW, Beaglehole D, DeVries AL (1993) Antifreeze glycopeptide adsorption on single crystal ice surfaces using ellipsometry. Biophys J 64:1878–1884PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Wöhrmann APA (1996) Antifreeze glycopeptides and peptides in Antarctic fish species from the Weddell Sea and the Lazarev Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130:47–59Google Scholar
  100. Wu DW, Duman JG (1991) Activation of antifreeze proteins from larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. J Comp Physiol B 161:279–283Google Scholar
  101. Wu DW, Duman JG, Xu L (1991) Enhancement of antifreeze protein activity by antibodies. Biochim Biophys Acta 1076:416–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Xu H, Griffith M, Patten CL, Glick BR (1998) Isolation and characterization of an antifreeze protein with ice nucleation activity from the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Can J Microbiol 44:64–73Google Scholar
  103. Yang DSC, Sax M, Chakrabartty A, Hew CL (1988) Crystal structure of an antifreeze polypeptide and its mechanistic implications. Nature 333:232–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Yeung KL, Wolf EE, Duman JG (1991) A scanning tunneling microscopy study of an insect lipoprotein ice nucleator. J Vac Sci Technol B 9:1197–1201Google Scholar
  105. Zachariassen KE, Hammel HT (1976) Nucleating agents in the haemolymph of insects tolerant to freezing. Nature 262:285–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Zachariassen KE, Husby JA (1982) Antifreeze effect of thermal hysteresis agents protects highly supercooled insects. Nature 298:865–867Google Scholar
  107. Zachariassen KE, DeVries AL, Hunt B, Kristiansen E (2002) Effect of ice fraction and dilution factor on the antifreeze activity in the hemolymph of the cerambycid beetle Rhagium inquisitor. Cryobiology 44:132–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Zanetti-Polzi L, Biswas AD, Del Galdo S, Barone V, Daidone I (2019) Hydration shell of antifreeze proteins: unveiling the role of non-ice-binding surfaces. J Phys Chem B 123:6474–6480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Zepeda S, Yokoyama E, Uda Y, Katagiri C, Furukawa Y (2008) In situ observation of antifreeze glycoprotein kinetics at the ice interface reveals a two-step reversible adsorption mechanism. Cryst Growth Des 8:3666–3672Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NTNU University LibraryTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations