Advertisement

Container Demand Forecasting at Border Posts of Ports: A Hybrid SARIMA-SOM-SVR Approach

  • Juan Jesús Ruiz-AguilarEmail author
  • Daniel Urda
  • José Antonio Moscoso-López
  • Javier González-Enrique
  • Ignacio J. Turias
Conference paper
  • 50 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1173)

Abstract

An accurate forecast of freight demand at sanitary facilities of ports is one of the key challeng-es for transport policymakers to better allocate resources and to improve planning operations. This paper proposes a combined hybrid approach to predict the short-term volume of containers passing through the sanitary facilities of a maritime port. The proposed methodology is based on a three-stage process. First, the time series is decomposed into similar smaller regions easier to predict using a self-organizing map (SOM) clustering. Then, a seasonal auto-regressive integrated moving averages (SARIMA) model is fitted to each cluster, obtaining predicted values and residuals of each cluster. A support vector regression (SVR) model is finally applied in each cluster using the historical data clustered and the predicted variables from the SARIMA step, testing different hybrid configurations. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed model outperforms other methodologies based on SVR. The proposed model can be used as an automatic decision-making tool by seaport or airport management due to its capacity to plan resources in advance.

Keywords

Container forecasting Machine learning Support vector regression Self-organizing maps Hybrid models 

Notes

Acknowlegements

Authors acknowledge support through grant RTI2018-098160-B-I00 from MINECO-SPAIN. The database has been kindly provided by the Port Authority of Algeciras Bay.

References

  1. 1.
    Babcock, M.W., Lu, X.: Forecasting inland waterway grain traffic. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 38(1), 65–74 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00017-5. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554501000175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M.: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, Oakland CA (1976). Revised ednzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, H., Grant-Muller, S., Mussone, L., Montgomery, F.: A study of hybrid neural network approaches and the effects of missing data on traffic forecasting. Neural Comput. Appl. 10(3), 277–286 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ismail, S., Shabri, A., Samsudin, R.: A hybrid model of self-organizing maps (SOM) and least square support vector machine (LSSVM) for time-series forecasting. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 10574–10578 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.107. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417411003137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klein, A.: Forecasting the Antwerp maritime traffic flows using transformations and intervention models. J. Forecast. 15(5), 395–412 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organising Maps. Springer, Berlin (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97610-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mak, K.L., Yang, D.H.: Forecasting Hong Kong’s container throughput with approximate least squares support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 7–12. Citeseer (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moscoso-López, J.A., Turias, I., Jiménez-Come, M.J., Ruiz-Aguilar, J.J., Cerbán, M.D.M.: A two-stage forecasting approach for short-term intermodal freight prediction. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12337MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruiz-Aguilar, J.J., Turias, I., Moscoso-López, J.A., Jiménez-Come, M.J., Cerbán, M.: Forecasting of short-term flow freight congestion: a study case of Algeciras Bay Port (Spain). Dyna 83(195), 163–172 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v83n195.47027. http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/dyna/article/view/47027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vapnik, V.N.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xie, G., Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Lai, K.K.: Hybrid approaches based on LSSVR model for container throughput forecasting: a comparative study. Appl. Soft Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2013.02.002, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156849461300046XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Jesús Ruiz-Aguilar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Urda
    • 1
  • José Antonio Moscoso-López
    • 1
  • Javier González-Enrique
    • 1
  • Ignacio J. Turias
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent Modelling of Systems Research Group, Polytechnic School of Engineering (Algeciras)University of CadizAlgecirasSpain

Personalised recommendations