Advertisement

Ethics and the Welfare of Fish

  • Bernice BovenkerkEmail author
  • Franck Meijboom
Chapter
  • 56 Downloads
Part of the Animal Welfare book series (AWNS, volume 20)

Abstract

To what extent fish can experience suffering and enjoyment is not just an empirical question, but one that also calls for ethical reflection. This is firstly, because animal welfare research is value laden and secondly, because the empirical evidence requires a normative framework in order to become action guiding in practices involving fish, such as aquaculture. In this chapter, we describe the role of ethics and different ethical theories that have been applied in animal ethics and that are relevant for discussions on fish welfare. We particularly focus on utilitarian, rights based, relational, and virtue ethical animal ethics theories. We furthermore argue that fish welfare is a term that combines moral norms and biological concepts. After all, when we implement fish welfare measures we have already made certain normative choices. We illustrate the integration between ethics and science in seven steps, from implementing fish welfare at the farm level, to weighing welfare against other values, defining and measuring welfare, to the questions of why welfare is morally relevant and what this means for the moral status of fish. We then consider the question of whether fish should be attributed to moral status and hence whether their welfare should be taken into account in our moral deliberations. However, not all moral concerns regarding our treatment of fish can be addressed by focussing on welfare. We discuss a number of concerns beyond welfare that need to be taken into consideration in a moral discussion on how to relate to fish: does the killing of fish constitute a moral harm? and how should we morally evaluate the process of domesticating fish in aquaculture? The chapter concludes by pointing out a number of moral issues in four practices involving fish: aquaculture, wild fisheries, experimentation, and recreation.

Keywords

Animal ethics Welfare Moral status Harm of death Domestication 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Victoria Braithwaite and Frederike Kaldeway for their collaboration on book chapters (Bovenkerk and Braithwaite 2016; Bovenkerk and Kaldewaij 2014; Bovenkerk and Meijboom 2012; Bovenkerk and Meijboom 2013) that have served as input for this chapter.

References

  1. Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Schwab A, Cowx IG (2002) Fish welfare: a challenge to the feelings-based approach, with implications for recreational fishing. Fish Fish 8(1):57–71Google Scholar
  2. Bartholomew A, Bohnsack JA (2005) A review of catch-and-release angling mortality with implications for no-take reserves. Rev Fish Biol Fish 15:129–154Google Scholar
  3. Barton BA (2002) Stress in fishes: a diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integr Comp Biol 42:517–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bos J, Bovenkerk B, Feindt P, Van Dam Y (2018) The quantified animal: precision livestock farming and the ethical implications of objectification. Food Ethics 2:77–92Google Scholar
  5. Bovenkerk B, Braithwaite V (2016) Beneath the surface: killing of fish as a moral problem. In: Meijboom F, Stassen E (eds) The end of animal life: a start for ethical debate. Ethical and societal considerations on killing animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 227–250Google Scholar
  6. Bovenkerk B, Kaldewaij F (2014) The use of animal models in behavioural neuroscience research. In: Lee G, Illes J, Ohl F (eds) Current topics in behavioural neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–46Google Scholar
  7. Bovenkerk B, Meijboom F (2012) The moral status of fish. The importance and limitations of a fundamental discussion for practical ethical questions in fish farming. J Agric Environ Ethics 25(6):843–860Google Scholar
  8. Bovenkerk B, Meijboom FLB (2013) Fish welfare in aquaculture: explicating the chain of interactions between science and ethics. J Agric Environ Ethics 26(1):41–61, special issue on fish welfareGoogle Scholar
  9. Bovenkerk B, Nijland H (2017) The pedigree dog breeding debate in ethics and practice: beyond welfare arguments. J Agric Environ Ethics 30(3):387–412Google Scholar
  10. Bovenkerk B, Brom FWA, Van den Bergh BJ (2001) Brave new birds. The use of ‘animal integrity’ in animal ethics. Hastings Centre Rep 32(1): 16–22, reprinted in Armstrong SJ, Botzler RG (eds) (2003) The animal ethics reader. Routledge, London, pp 351–358Google Scholar
  11. Bovenkerk B, Brom FWA, Van den Bergh BJ (2002) Brave new birds. The use of ‘animal integrity’ in animal ethics. Hastings Cent Rep 32(1):16–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bracke MBM (1990) Killing animals, or, why no wrong is done to an animal when killed painlessly. MA thesisGoogle Scholar
  13. Braithwaite V (2010) Do fish feel pain? Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Braithwaite V, de Perera TB (2006) Short-range orientation in fish: how fish map space. Mar Fresh Water Behav Physiol 39(1):37–47Google Scholar
  15. Brando S (2016) Wild animals in entertainment. In: Bovenkerk B, Keulartz J (eds) Animal ethics in the age of humans. Blurring boundaries in human-animal relationships. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 295–318Google Scholar
  16. Brom FWA (1997) Onherstelbaar verbeterd: biotechnologie bij dieren als een moreel probleem. Van Gorcum, AssenGoogle Scholar
  17. Bshary R, Hohner A, Ait-el-Djoudi K, Fricke H (2006) Interspecific communicative and coordinated hunting between groupers and giant moray eels in the Red Sea. PLoS Biol 4(12):e431PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Cigman R (1981) Death, misfortune and species inequality. Philos Public Aff 10(1):47–64Google Scholar
  19. Cooke SJ, Cowx IG (2004) The role of recreational fisheries in global fish crises. Bioscience 54:857–859Google Scholar
  20. Daniels N (1979) Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. J Philos 76(5):256–282Google Scholar
  21. Davidson D (1982) Rational animals. Dialectica 36:318–327Google Scholar
  22. DeGrazia D (2002) Animal rights: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Donovan J (2006) Feminism and the treatment of animals: from care to dialogue. Signs J Women Cult Soc 31(2):305–329Google Scholar
  24. Duncan IJH (1996) Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agric Scand. Sect A Anim Sci 27(Suppl):29–35Google Scholar
  25. Duncan IJH (2006) The changing concept of animal sentience. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100(1–2.) (October):11–19Google Scholar
  26. Ebbesson LOE, Braithwaite VA (2012) Environmental impacts on fish neural plasticity and cognition. J Fish Biol 81:2151–2174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. EFSA (2008) Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare on a request from the European Commission on animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed fish: carp. EFSA J 843:1–28Google Scholar
  28. Franco NH, Olsson A (2016) Killing animals as a necessary evil? The case of animal research. In: Meijboom F, Stassen E (eds) The end of animal life: a start for ethical debate. Ethical and societal considerations on killing animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 187–201Google Scholar
  29. Franco NH, Olsson A, Sandøe P (2018) How researchers view and value the 3Rs – an upturned hierarchy? PLoS One 13(8):e0200895.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200895CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Fraser D (2003) Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and values. Anim Welf 12:433–443Google Scholar
  31. Galhardo L, Almeida O, Oliveira R (2009) Preference for the presence of substrate in male cichlid fish: effects of social dominance and context. Appl Anim Behav Sci 120(3–4):224–230Google Scholar
  32. Goodpaster KE (1978) On being morally considerable. J Philos 75(6):308–325Google Scholar
  33. Gruen L (2010) The moral status of animals. In Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/moral-animal/
  34. Harfeld JL, Cornou C, Kornum A, Gjerris M (2016) Seeing the animal: on the ethical implications of de-animalization in intensive animal production systems. J Agric Environ Ethics 29(3):407–423Google Scholar
  35. Haynes RP (2008) Animal welfare: competing conceptions and ethical implications. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  36. Haynes RP (2011) Competing conceptions of animals welfare and their ethical implications for the treatment of non-human animals. Acta Biotheor 59:105–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaldewaij F (2006) Animals and the harm of death. In: Kaiser M, Lien M (eds) Ethics and the politics of food. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic, pp. 528–532. Reprinted in Armstrong SJ, Botzler RG (eds) The animal ethics reader. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Kiessling A (2009) Feed – the key to sustainable fish farming. In: Fisheries, sustainability and development. Fifty-two authors on co-existence and development of fisheries and aquaculture in developing and developed countries. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and forestry (KSLA), Halmstad, pp 303–323Google Scholar
  39. Longino H (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Manuel R, Boerrigter J, Roques J, van der Heul J, van den Bos R, Flik G, van de Vis H (2014) Stress in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) following overland transportation. Fish Physiol Biochem 40(1):33–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Manuel R, Gorissen M, Stokkermans M, Zethof J, Ebbesson LOE, van de Vis H, Flik G, van den Bos R (2015) The effects of environmental enrichment and age-related differences on inhibitory avoidance in Zebrafish (Danio rerio Hamilton). Zebrafish 12(2):152–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mood A, Brook P (2012) Estimating the number of farmed fish killed in global aquaculture each year. Fishcount, London. http://tinyurl.com/qxao6o7Google Scholar
  43. Nagel T (1991) Mortal questions. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Nilsson J, Kristiansen TS, Fosseidengen JE, Fernö A, van den Bos R (2008) Learning in cod (Gadus morhua): long trace interval retention. Anim Cogn 11(2):215–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nordquist RE, van der Staay FJ, van Eerdenburg FJCM, Velkers FC, Fijn L, Arndt SS (2017) Mutilating procedures, management practices, and housing conditions that may affect the welfare of farm animals – implications for welfare research. Animals 7(2):12.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7020012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ohl F, van der Staay FJ (2012) Animal welfare: at the interface between science and society. Vet J 129(1):13–19Google Scholar
  47. Palmer C (2010) Animal ethics in context. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  49. Reimer T, Dempster T, Wargelius A, Fjelldal PG, Hansen T, Glover KA, Solberg MF, Swearer SE (2017) Rapid growth causes abnormal vaterite formation in farmed fish otoliths. J Exp Biol 220:2965–2969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rijnsdorp A, De Haan D, Smith S, Strietman WJ (2016) Pulse fishing and its effects on the marine ecosystem and fisheries. An update of the scientific knowledge. Wageningen University and Research Report. http://edepot.wur.nl/405708
  51. Röcklinsberg H (2012) Fish for food in a challenged climate: ethical reflections. In: Potthast T, Meisch S (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Ethical perspectives on land use and food production. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, pp 326–334Google Scholar
  52. Roques JAC, Abbink W, Geurds F, van de Vis H, Flik G (2010) Tailfin clipping, a painful procedure: studies on Nile tilapia and common carp. Physiol Behav 101(4):533–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rose JD (2002) The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Rev Fish Sci 10:1–38Google Scholar
  54. Rose JD, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Diggles BK, Sawynok W, Stevens ED, Wynne CDL (2014) Can fish really feel pain? Fish Fish 15(1):97–133Google Scholar
  55. Rutgers LJE, Heeger FR (1999) Inherent worth and respect for animal integrity. In: Dol M (ed) Recognizing the intrinsic value of animals: beyond animal welfare. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 41–52Google Scholar
  56. Schmit K (2011) Concepts of animal welfare in relation to positions in animal ethics. Acta Biotheor 59(2):153–171Google Scholar
  57. Silverstein HS (1980) The evil of death. J Philos 77:414–415Google Scholar
  58. Singer P (1975) Animal liberation. A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York Review, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Singer P (1980) Animals and the value of life. In: Regan T (ed) Matters of life and death. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Swart JAA, Keulartz J (2011) Wild animals in our backyard. A contextual approach to the intrinsic value of animals. Acta Biotheor 59(2):185–200PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Tooley M (1972) Abortion and infanticide. Philos Public Aff:37–65Google Scholar
  62. Van de Vis H, Kestin S, Robb D, Oehlenschlager J, Lambooij B, Munkner W, Kuhlmann H, Kloosterboer K, Tejada M, Huidobro A, Ottera H, Roth B, Sorensen NK, Akse L, Byrne H, Nesvadba P (2003) Is humane slaughter of fish possible for industry? Aquac Res 34:211–220Google Scholar
  63. Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG, Schuppli CA, Weary DM (2013) Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: the case of early cow-calf separation. J Dairy Sci 96(9):6105–6116.  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Višak T (2013) Killing happy animals: explorations in utilitarian ethics. Palgrave McMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Yeates JW (2011) Brain-pain: do animals with higher cognitive capacities feel more pain? Insights for species selection in scientific experiments. Large animals as biomedical models: ethical, societal, legal and biological aspects. In: Hagen K, Schnieke A, Thiele F (eds) Large animals as biomedical models: ethical, social, legal and biological aspects. Europaische Akademie, Bad-Neuenahr-AhrweilerGoogle Scholar

Websites

  1. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121010012427/http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.htm. Accessed on 3/7/2018Google Scholar
  2. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5692e.pdf. Accessed on 2/7/2018Google Scholar
  3. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/02/05/fish-farms-global-food-fish-supply-2030. Accessed 2/7/2018Google Scholar
  4. https://www.asc-aqua.org/the-principles-behind-the-asc-standards/. Accessed on 2/7/2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Group, Wageningen University and ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animals in Science and SocietyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations