Advertisement

Fish as Laboratory Animals

  • Anne Christine Utne-PalmEmail author
  • Adrian Smith
Chapter
  • 65 Downloads
Part of the Animal Welfare book series (AWNS, volume 20)

Abstract

In this chapter, we aim at giving an overview of the extent to which fish are used in laboratory studies. We look at the most commonly used species (zebrafish, salmonids, goldfish, medaka and three-spined stickleback) and give some reasons why these species—and fish in general—are so popular experimental animals. Further, we give an overview of some of the legislation governing the use of fish as experimental animals and the areas in which they are used. We describe general and specific efforts to improve laboratory fish welfare and the quality of the research being performed on them. Given that fish is such a diverse group of species with species-specific needs and adaptations, it is difficult to make general guidelines, but we argue that we can achieve a great deal by building a knowledge database and welfare guidelines for the most commonly used species. Guidelines for planning and conducting fish experiments are mentioned, as well as advice on the assessment of welfare in fish species.

Keywords

Fish Laboratory Research Zebrafish Salmonid Goldfish Medaka Stickleback 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Gunvor Kristin Knudsen for assistance with statistical data regarding the use of research animals in non-EU countries.

References

  1. Balls M (2008) Professor W.M.S. Russell (1925–2006): Doyen of the three Rs. ALTEX 14, Special Issue, 1–7. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Alternatives & Animal Use in the Life Sciences, August 21–25, 2007, Tokyo. http://www.asas.or.jp/jsaae_old/zasshi/WC6_PC/paper1pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  2. Barber I, Scharsack JP (2010) The three-spined stickleback-Schistocephalus solidus system: an experimental model for investigating host-parasite interactions in fish. Parasitology 137:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber I, Hoare D, Krause J (2000) Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: a review and evolutionary perspective. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10:131–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bert B, Chmielewska J, Bergmann S, Busch M, Driever W, Finger-Baier K, Hößler J, Köhler A, Leich N, Misgeld T, Nöldner T, Reiher A, Schartl M, Seebach-Sproedt A, Thumberger T, Schönfelder G, Grune B (2016) Considerations for a European animal welfare standard to evaluate adverse phenotypes in teleost fish. EMBO J 35:1151–1154.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201694448. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  5. Blanco AM, Sundarrajan L, Bertucci JI, Unniappan S (2017) Why goldfish? Merits and challenges in employing goldfish as a model organism in comparative endocrinology research. Gen Comp Endocrinol 257:13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.02.001. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  6. Botham PA (2004) Acute systemic toxicity – prospects for tiered testing strategies. Toxicol In Vitro 18(2):227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brattelid T, Smith AJ (2000) Guidelines for reporting the results of experiments on fish. Lab Anim 34:131–135. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/002367700780457590. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  8. Brydges NM, Boulcott P, Ellis T, Braithwaite VA (2009) Quantifying stress responses induced by different handling methods in three species of fish. Appl Anim Behav Sci 116:295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrd E, Widmar NO, Fulton J (2017) Of fur, feather and fin: human’s use and concern for non-human species. Animals 7(3):22.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7030022. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  10. Castaño A, Bols N, Braunbeck T, Dierickx P, Halder M, Isomaa B, Kawahara K, Lee LEJ, Mothersill C, Pärt P, Repetto G, Sintes JR, Rufli H, Smith R, Wood C, Segner H (2003) The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology the report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 47. ATLA 31:317–351. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/026119290303100314. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  11. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JPA, Oliver S (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383:156–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62229-1. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  12. Chen H, Hu J, Yang J, Wang Y, Xu H, Jiang Q, Gong Y, Gu Y, Song H (2010) Generation of a fluorescent transgenic zebrafish for detection of environmental estrogens. Aquat Toxicol 96:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Council of Europe (1986) European convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (ETS 123). http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/123. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  14. Dong S, Kang M, Wu X, Ye T (2014) Development of a promising fish model (Oryzias melastigma) for assessing multiple responses to stresses in the marine environment. BioMed Research International. ID 563131, 17 p.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/563131. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  15. Ellery AW (1985) Guidelines for specification of animals and husbandry methods when reporting the results of animal experiments. Report of the Working Committee for the Biological Characterization of Laboratory Animals/GV-SOLAS, Laboratory Animals 19, pp 106–108. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/002367785780942714. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  16. Erkekoglu P, Giray BK, Başaran N (2011) 3R principle and alternative toxicity testing methods. FABAD J Pharm Sci 36(2):101–117Google Scholar
  17. European Union (2010) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0063. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  18. European Union (2019) Implementation, interpretation and terminology of Directive 2010/63/EU. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/interpretation_en.htm. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  19. European Union (2020) 2019 report on the statistics on the use of animals for scientific purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015–2017. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1581689520921&uri=CELEX:52020DC0016. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  20. Expert Working Group Report (2009) On severity classification of scientific procedures performed on animals. Brussels, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/report_ewg.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  21. FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all Rome, 190 pages. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  22. FAO (2019a) Salmo trutta (Berg, 1908). http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Salmo_trutta/en. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  23. FAO (2019b) Salmo salar (Linnaeus, 1758). http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Salmo_salar/en. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  24. FELASA (2019a) Library. http://www.felasa.eu/about-us/library. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  25. FELASA (2019b) Recommendations. http://www.felasa.eu/working-groups/recommendation. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  26. FishBase (2019). https://www.fishbase.se. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  27. Garner JP, Gaskill BN, Weber EM, Ahloy-Dallaire J, Pritchett-Corning KR (2017) Introducing Therioepistemology: the study of how knowledge is gained from animal research. Lab Anim 46:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glover KA, Solberg MF, McGinnity P, Hindar K, Verspoor E, Coulson MW, Hansen MM, Araki H, Skaala Ø, Svåsand T (2017) Half a century of genetic interaction between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: status of knowledge and unanswered questions. Fish Fish 1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12214. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  29. Goldshmit Y, Sztal T, Jusuf PR, Hall TE, Nguyen-Chi M, Currie PD (2012) Fgf-dependent glial cell bridges facilitate spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish. J Neurosci 32(22):7477–7492.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0758-12.2012. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  30. Gressler LT, Riffel APK, Parodi TV, Saccol EMH, Koakoski G, Costa ST, Pavanato MA, Heinzmann BM, Caron B, Schmidt D, Llesuy SF, Barcellos LJG, Baldisserotto B (2014) Silver catfish Rhamdia quelen immersion anaesthesia with essential oil of Aloysia triphylla (L’Hérit) Britton or tricaine methanesulfonate: effect on stress response and antioxidant status. Aquac Res 45(6):1061–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawkins P (2009) An overview of existing guidelines for handling, bleeding, administration and identification techniques. https://norecopa.no/media/6342/fish-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  32. Hawkins WE, Walker WW, Fournie JW, Manning JS, Krol RM (2003) Use of the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) and guppy (Poecilia reticulata) in carcinogenesis testing under national toxicology program protocols. Toxicol Pathol 31:88–91. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/01926230390174968. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  33. Hawkins P, Dennison N, Goodman G, Hetherington S, Llywelyn-Jones S, Ryder K, Smith AJ (2011) Guidance on the severity classification of scientific procedures involving fish: report of a working group appointed by the Norwegian consensus-platform for the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal experiments (Norecopa). Lab Anim 45:219–224.  https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2011.010181. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  34. Hodson PV (1985) A comparison of the acute toxicity of chemicals to fish, rats and mice. J Appl Toxicol 5:2220–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF et al (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496:498–503.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12111. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  36. Humane Research Australia (2016) 2015 Australian Statistics of Animal Use in Research and Teaching. http://www.humaneresearch.org.au/statistics/statistics_2015. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  37. IUCN Red List (2014) Table 1. Numbers of threatened species by major groups of organisms (1996–2014). http://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/summarystats/2014_3_Summary_Stats_Page_Documents/2014_3_RL_Stats_Table_1.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  38. Iversen I, Finstad B, McKinley RS, Eliassen RA (2003) The efficacy of metomidate, clove oil, Aqui-Sk and Benzoak® as anaesthetics in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts, and their potential stress-reducing capacity. Aquaculture 221:549–566Google Scholar
  39. Johansen R, Needham JR, Colquhoun DJ, Poppe TT, Smith AJ (2006) Guidelines for health and welfare monitoring of fish used in research. Lab Anim 40:323–340. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/002367706778476451. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  40. Katsiadaki I, Sanders M, Sebire M, Nagae M, Soyano K, Scott AP (2007) Three-spined stickleback: an emerging model in environmental endocrine disruption. Environ Sci 14:263–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8:e1000412.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  42. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203:253–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kishimoto N, Shimizu K, Sawamoto K (2012) Neuronal regeneration in a zebrafish model of adult brain injury. Dis Model Mech 5:200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.007336. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  44. Klein HJ, Bayne KA (2007) Establishing a culture of care, conscience, and responsibility: addressing the improvement of scientific discovery and animal welfare through science-based performance standards. ILAR J 43(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koyama J, Kawamata M, Imai S, Fukunaga M, Uno S, Kakuno A (2008) Java medaka: a proposed new marine test fish for ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol 23(4):487–491.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20367. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  46. Lamatsch DK, Steinlein C, Schmid M, Schartl M (2000) Noninvasive determination of genome size and ploidy level in fishes by flow cytometry: detection of triploid Poecilia Formosa. Cytometry 39:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ledford H (2015) CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature 522(7554):20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ljiri K (2003) Life-cycle experiments of medaka fish aboard the international space station. Adv Space Biol Med 9:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Louhimies S (2015) Refinement facilitated by the culture of care. In: Proceedings of the EUSAAT congress, 20–23 Sept 2015, Linz. ALTEX, vol 4(2), p 154. Abstract available at http://www.altex.ch/resources/ALTEX_Linz_proceedings_2015_full.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  50. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JPA, Al-Shahi Salman R, Chan A-W, Glasziou P (2014) Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 383:101–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62329-6. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  51. Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL (2008) Fixational eye movements across vertebrates: comparative dynamics, physiology, and perception. J Vis 8:28.  https://doi.org/10.1167/8.14.28. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  52. Mattilsynet (2019) Forsøksdyr. https://www.mattilsynet.no/dyr_og_dyrehold/dyrevelferd/forsoksdyr/. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  53. McKinnon JS, Rundle HD (2002) Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol Evol 17:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mettam JJ, Oulton LJ, McCrohan CR, Sneddon LU (2011) The efficacy of three types of analgesic drugs in reducing pain in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Appl Anim Behav Sci 133(3):265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, du Sert NP, Simonsohn U, Wagenmakers E-J, Ware JJ, Ioannidis JPA (2017) A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav 1:0021.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  56. Myosho T, Takehana Y, Hamaguchi S, Sakaizumi M (2015) Turnover of sex chromosomes in Celebensis group medaka fishes. Genes Genomes Genet 5:2685–2691Google Scholar
  57. Nilsson (2017) Social enrichment and requirements for the tank rearing of Atlantic salmon. https://norecopa.no/media/7276/nilsson.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  58. Nissen SB, Magidson T, Gross K, Bergstrom CT (2016) Publication bias and the canonization of false facts. eLife 5:e21451.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21451. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  59. NOAA Fisheries (2014) Salmon restoration and PIT tags: big data from a small device. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/salmon-restoration-and-pit-tags-big-data-small-device. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  60. Norecopa (2019a) The International Culture of Care Network. https://norecopa.no/coc. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  61. Norecopa (2019b) Severity classification. http://norecopa.no/categories. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  62. Norecopa (2019c) The 3R Guide database. https://norecopa.no/3r-guide-database. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  63. Norecopa (2019d) ENRICH fish. http://www.enrich-fish.net. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  64. Norecopa (2019e) Harmonisation of the care and use of fish in research. https://norecopa.no/meetings/fish-2009. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  65. Norecopa (2019f) 3rs resources and guidelines for zebrafish. http://norecopa.no/media/7724/zebrafish-resources.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  66. Ostlund-Nilsson S, Maier I, Huntingford F (2007) Biology of the three-spined stickleback. Taylor & Francis Group, London, p 392Google Scholar
  67. Paget E (1983) The LD50 test. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 52:1–14Google Scholar
  68. Pelletier C, Hanson KC, Cooke SJ (2007) Do catch-and-release guidelines from state and provincial fisheries agencies in North America conform to scientifically based best practices? Environ Manag 39:760–773.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0173-2. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  69. Popesku JT, Martyniuk CJ, Mennigen J, Xiong H, Zhang D, Xia X, Cossins AR, Trudeau VL (2008) The goldfish (Carassius auratus) as a model for neuroendocrine signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol 293:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Popovic NT, Strunjak-Perovic I, Coz-Rakovac R, Barisic J, Jadan M, Berakovic AP, Klobucar RS (2012) Tricaine methane-sulfonate (MS-222) application in fish anaesthesia. J Appl Ichthyol 28:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Readman GD, Owen SF, Murrell JC, Knowles TG (2013) Do fish perceive anaesthetics as aversive? PLoS One 8(9):e73773.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073773. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  72. Rowan A, Goldberg A (1995) Responsible animal research: a riff of Rs. ATLA 23:306–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Russell WMR, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Wheathampstead. https://caat.jhsph.edu/principles/the-principles-of-humane-experimental-technique. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  74. SALMOTRIP (2013) Feasibility study of triploid salmon production. http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/60437_en.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  75. Sambraus F (2016) Solving bottlenecks in triploide Atlantic salmon production. Temperature, hypoxia and dietary effects on performance, cataracts and metabolism. PhD thesis University of Bergen, p 69. http://bora.uib.no/handle/1956/15352. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  76. Small BC (2003) Anesthetic efficacy of metomidate and comparison of plasma cortisol responses to tricaine methanesulfonate, quinaldine and clove oil anesthetized channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus. Aquaculture 218:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith AJ, Hawkins P (2016) Good science, good sense and good sensibilities: the three Ss of Carol Newton. Animals 6:70.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6110070. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  78. Smith AJ, Clutton RE, Lilley E, Hansen KEA, Brattelid T (2017) PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Lab Anim 52:135–141. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0023677217724823. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  79. Sneddon LU (2009) Pain perception in fish: indicators and endpoints. ILAR J 50(4):338–342.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.50.4.338. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  80. Sneddon LU (2012) Clinical anesthesia and analgesia in fish. J Exotic Pet Med 21:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Speaking of Research (2019) Worldwide animal research statistics. https://speakingofresearch.com/2017/09/27/canada-sees-rise-in-animal-research-numbers-in-2016/. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  82. Spence R, Gerlach G, Lawrence C, Smith C (2008) The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Biol Rev 83:13–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00030.x. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  83. Stallard N, Whitehead A, Ridgway P (2002) Statistical evaluation of the revised fixed-dose procedure. Hum Exp Toxicol 21:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stien LH, Bracke MBM, Folkedal O, Nilsson J, Oppedal F, Torgersen T, Kittilsen S, Midtlyng PJ, Vindas MA, Øverli Ø, Kristiansen TS (2013) Salmon welfare index model (SWIM 1.0): a semantic model for overall welfare assessment of caged Atlantic salmon: review of the selected welfare indicators and model presentation. Rev Aquac 5:33–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01083.x. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  85. Tannenbaum J, Bennett BT (2015) Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 54:120–132. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aalas/jaalas/2015/00000054/00000002/art00002. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  86. Thompson RRJ, Paul ES, Radford AN, Purser J, Mendl M (2016) Routine handling methods affect behaviour of three-spined sticklebacks in a novel test of anxiety. Behav Brain Res 306:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Van den Heuvel MJ, Clark DG, Fielder RJ, Koundakjian PP, Oliver GJA, Pelling D, Tomlinson NJ, Walker AP (1990) The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. Food Chem Toxicol 28:469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wade N (2010) Research offers clue into how hearts can regenerate in some species. NY Times, March 24. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/science/25heart.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  89. Wargelius A, Leininger S, Skaftnesmo KO, Kleppe L, Andersson E, Taranger GL, Schulz RW, Edvardsen RB (2016) Dnd knockout ablates germ cells and demonstrates germ cell independent sex differentiation in Atlantic salmon. Sci Rep 6:21284.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21284. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
  90. Wittbrodt J, Shima A, Schartl M (2002) Medaka – a model organism from the far east. Nat Rev 3:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Woods IG, Kelly PD, Chu F, Ngo-Hazelett P, Yan Y-L, Huang H, Postlethwait JH, Talbot WS (2000) A comparative map of the zebrafish genome. Genome Res 10(12):1903–1914Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Marine ResearchBergenNorway
  2. 2.NorecopaOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations