Advertisement

Towards an Understanding of Linguistic Consultancy: How Do Linguists Approach the Task of Evaluating Sociolinguistic Practice in Consultancy Sessions?

  • Kieran FileEmail author
  • Stephanie Schnurr
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Communicating in Professions and Organizations book series (PSPOD)

Abstract

This chapter aims to (1) share insights from our work exploring how applied linguists can help sports coaches critically reflect on their linguistic behaviour, and (2) use this work to reflect on the role and boundaries of the applied linguist as consultant. We present a case study analysis of coach communication in an all-female competitive netball team, which involved consideration of linguistic practice in light of the coach’s goals, values and beliefs about leadership and her role in the construction of a positive team environment.

Through this case study analysis, we critically reflect on the role and boundaries within which the applied linguist as consultant operates. We argue that, for applied linguists to be effective consultants, and to hold true to their disciplinary aim of accounting for language use in social context, they need to orient to an expertise-sharing consultancy model, working with those they consult. The potential issues that emerge from such a model are also highlighted.

References

  1. Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., & Richardson, K. (1993). Ethics, Advocacy and Empowerment: Issues of Method in Researching Language. Language & Communication, 13(2), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Candlin, S. (2003). Issues Arising When the Professional Workplace Is the Site of Applied Linguistic Research. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DuBois, J. (2007). The Stance Triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (pp. 141–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  5. Englebretson, R. (Ed.). (2007). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  6. File, K., & Wilson, N. (2017). Adapting Self for Private and Public Audiences: The Enactment of Leadership Identity by New Zealand Rugby Coaches in Huddles and Interviews. In D. van De Mieroop & S. Schnurr (Eds.), Identity Struggles. Evidence from Workplaces Around the World (pp. 317–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gales, T. (2011). Identifying Interpersonal Stance in Threatening Discourse: An Appraisal Analysis. Discourse Studies, 13(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gee, J. P. (2018). Introducing Discourse Analysis: From Grammar to Society. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Giles, H., & Powesland, P. (1975). Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gunnarsson, B.-L. (2009). Discourse in Organizations and Workplaces. In W. Li (Ed.), Contemporary Applied Linguistics. Volume 2, Linguistics for the Real World (pp. 122–141). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Having a Laugh at Work: How Humour Contributes to Workplace Culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1683–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koester, A. (2006). Investigating Workplace Discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Linde, C. (1997). Evaluation As Linguistic Structure and Social Practice. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The Construction of Professional Discourse (pp. 151–172). Harlow: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Marra, M. (2012). Disagreeing Without Being Disagreeable: Negotiating Workplace Communities as an Outsider. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1580–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McIntyre, D., & Price, H. (Eds.). (2018). Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Sarangi, S., & Roberts, C. (Eds.). (1999). Talk, Work, and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation, and Management Settings. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Scollon, R., Jones, R., & Scollon, S. (2012). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Vine, B. (2004). Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolfers, S., File, K., & Schnurr, S. (2017). “Just Because He’s Black”: Identity Construction and Racial Humour in a German U-19 Football Team. Journal of Pragmatics, 112, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WarwickWarwickUK

Personalised recommendations