Advertisement

A Victimological Exploration of the African Values of Ubuntu

  • Robert PeacockEmail author
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

With specific reference to apartheid South Africa and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), this discussion focuses on the transformative potential of the ancient African worldview of Ubuntu and the importance of interpretation and meaning of culture in relation to the study-field of victimology and the administration of criminal justice. Ubuntu was conceptualized as the affirmation of one’s humanity with others in its infinite variety of context and form, whereby one’s own sense of humanity is gained from the humanity shared with others. With victimization that seeks to dehumanize, analyses referred to a critical exploration of the restorative Ubuntu values of interdependence and communality to advance the intense humanness of a universal personhood in our attempts to address and transcend institutional, structural and interpersonal victimization.

Keywords

Cultural victimology Institutional victimization African victimology Ubuntu values State violence Apartheid 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington DC: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, R.H. (2002). Understanding African Philosophy. A cross-cultural approach to classical and contemporary issues in Africa. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Biko, S. (2007). No fears expressed. Pretoria: Ultra Litho.Google Scholar
  4. Bohler-Muller, N. (2008). Against forgetting: Reconciliation and reparations after the truth and reconciliation commission. Stellenbosch Law Review, 3: 466482.Google Scholar
  5. Broodryk, J. (2002). Ubuntu. Life lessons from Africa. Pretoria: Ubuntu School of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  6. Child Justice Act (Act 75 of 2008). Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  7. Colvin, C.J. (2007). Civil society and reconciliation in Southern Africa. Development in Practice, 17(3): 322337.Google Scholar
  8. Danieli, Y. (2009). Massive trauma and the healing role of reparative justice. Journal of Traumatic stress, 22(5): 351357.Google Scholar
  9. Du Plooy, B. (2014). Ubuntu and the recent phenomenon of the Charter for Compassion. South African Review of Sociology, 45(1): 83100.Google Scholar
  10. Fattah, E.A. (2006). Is Punishment the Appropriate Response to Gross Human Rights Violations? Is a Non-punitive Justice System Feasible? Paper presented at the Politics of Restorative Justice in Post-Conflict South Africa and Beyond conference. Cape Town: 2122 September.Google Scholar
  11. Groenhujsen, M.S. (2001). General report on rights and obligations towards victims. In A. Gaudreault & I. Waller (Eds). Beyond boundaries: Research and Action for the Third Millennium. Montreal: Association Quebecoise Plaidoyer Victames (pp: 229238).Google Scholar
  12. Groenhuijsen, M.S. (2019). Recent past and immediate future challenges of victimology in a volatile environment. In R. Peacock, (Ed). Victimology in Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik (pp: 387363).Google Scholar
  13. Hanks, T. L. (2008). The ubuntu paradigm: psychology’s next force? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(1): 116135.Google Scholar
  14. Himonga, C, Taylor, M & Pope, A. (2013). Reflections on Judicial views of Ubuntu. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(5): 369427.Google Scholar
  15. Interim Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Act No 200 of 1993. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  16. Kagee, A. (2004). Present concerns of survivors of human rights violations in South Africa. Social Science and Medicine, 59: 625635.Google Scholar
  17. Keevy, I. (2008). African philosophical values and constitutionalism: A feminist perspective on Ubuntu as a constitutional value. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of the Free State: Bloemfontein.Google Scholar
  18. Kirchhoff, G.F. (2010). History and a theoretical structure of victimology. In S.G. Shohom, P.Knepper & M. Kett (Eds). International Handbook of Victimology. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis (pp: 95123).Google Scholar
  19. Krog, A. (1998). Country of my skull. Johannesburg: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Krog, A. (2008). ‘This thing called reconciliation…’ forgiveness as part of an interconnectedness-towards-wholeness. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(4): 353366.Google Scholar
  21. Letchert, R., Haveman, R., De Brouwer, A., & Pemberton, A. (2011). Victimological approaches to International Crimes. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  22. Maiello, S. (2001). On the transgenerational transmission of trauma and violence. Psycho-analytic Psychotherapy in South Africa, 9(2): 1331.Google Scholar
  23. Murithi, T. (2009). An African perspective on peace education: Ubuntu lessons in reconciliation. International Review of Education, 55: 221233.Google Scholar
  24. Mutsiwa, A. (2015) Precedent, Policy and Possibility; A Victimological Orientation towards the Protection of Traditional Knowledge in Africa. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Kwazulu-Natal: Durban.Google Scholar
  25. Nomoyi, C. (2001). Impact of the dynamics of the Reparations and Rehabilitation Committee of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on female victims. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology. 14(1): 110.Google Scholar
  26. Peacock, R. (2011). The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Challenges in contributing to reconciliation. In R. Letchert, R. Haveman, A. de Brouwer & A. Pemberton. Victimological approaches to International Crimes. Cambridge: Intersentia (pp: 315333).Google Scholar
  27. Peacock, R. (2014). Institutional and Structural victimization: Colonial and Apartheid South Africa. In D Roth & D Kauzlarich (Eds). Towards a Victimology of State Crime. Oxford: Routledge (pp: 212224).Google Scholar
  28. Peacock, R. (2019). Victimology in Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  29. Picker, R. (2005). Victims’ perspectives about the Human Rights Violation hearings. Available from http://www.csvr.org.za/ Accessed on 12 February 2010.Google Scholar
  30. Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act (34 of 1995) of the Republic of South Africa, Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  31. Sherman, L.W & Strang, H. (2009). Crime and Reconciliation: Experimental Criminology and the future of Restorative Justice. Acta Criminologica, 22(1): 112.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel, L. J. (2004). Criminology: Theories, patterns and typologies. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  33. South African Coalition for Transitional Justice. (2011). Comments on the Draft Regulations published by the Department of Justice dealing with Reparations for apartheid era victims. Available from http://www.csvr.org.za/. Accessed on 1 February 2020.
  34. South African Commission for Transitional Justice. (2011). Comments on the Draft Regulations published by the Department of Justice dealing with Reparations for apartheid era victims. Available from http://www.csvr.org.za/. Accessed on 3 March 2013.
  35. Stakhov A. (2006) The golden section, secrets of the Egyptian civilization and harmony mathematics. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 30: 490505.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, C.G. (2008). Ubuntu: The missing link in the rights discourse in post-apartheid transformation in South Africa. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies, 3(2): 3963.Google Scholar
  37. Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (1998). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  38. Tutu, D. M. (1999). No future without forgiveness. Park Town: Random House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weitekamp, E.M. & Rosenblatt, F. (2013) Restorative Justice around the world and in cases of mass victimisation. In R. Peacock, (Ed). Victimology in South Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik (pp: 129144).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology, University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations