Advertisement

Impact of Psychosocial Risk Factors on Workers’ Health: Contributions of a Subjective Health Indicator

  • Carla BarrosEmail author
  • Pilar Baylina
  • Liliana Cunha
Chapter
  • 109 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 277)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of psychosocial risks factors on professionals’ drivers using a subjective health indicator—the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The results shows that professionals’ drivers are exposed to huge amount of psychosocial risk factors related to, such as, high demands and work intensity, working hours, emotional demands and some work characteristics. NPH subscales (physical mobility, pain, energy level, sleep, social isolation and emotional reaction) showed significantly associations with psychosocial risk factors, but most particularly the work intensity and working hours with the dimension of emotional reaction. These results reinforce the fact that work activity in transportation remains severe in terms of working conditions, given an ever-increasing work intensification scenario, associated with time constraints and day-to-day experienced pressure. New research in this area will have important implications for the understanding of subjective health on mental health and well-being determining factors.

Keywords

Psychosocial risk factors Workers’ health Subjective health 

References

  1. 1.
    Arlinghaus, A., Nachreiner, F.: Health effects of supplemental work from home in the European Union. Chronobiol. Int. 31(10), 1100–1107 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barros, C.: Fatores psicossociais de risco no trabalho de hoje. In: Roxo M.M. (Coord.). Trabalho sem fronteiras? O papel da regulação, pp. 141–159. Coimbra, Almedina (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barros-Duarte, C., Cunha, L., Lacomblez, M.: INSAT: uma proposta metodológica para análise dos efeitos das condições de trabalho sobre a saúde. Laboreal 3(2), 54–62 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barros, C., Cunha, L.: Avaliação dos fatores psicossociais de risco: contributos do Inquérito INSAT. In: Neto, H.V., Areosa, J., Arezes, P. (Org). Manual sobre Riscos Psicossociais no Trabalho, pp. 333–346. Civeri Publishing, Vila do Conde (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barros-Duarte, C., Cunha, L.: INSAT2010—Inquérito Saúde e Trabalho: outras questões, novas relações. Laboreal 6(2), 19–26 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barros, C., Carnide, F., Cunha, L., Santos M., Silva C.: Will I be able to do my work at 60? An analysis of working conditions that hinder active ageing. WORK J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil. 51, 579–590 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barros, C., Cunha, L., Oliveira, A., Baylina, P., Rocha, A.: Development and validation of a health and work survey based on the Rasch model among Portuguese Workers. J. Med. Syst. 41(79), 1–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brisson, C., Gilbert-Ouimet, M., Duchaine, C., Trudel, X., Vézina, M.: Workplace interventions aiming to improve psychosocial work factors and related health. In: Siegrist, J., Wahrendorf, M. (eds.) Work Stress and Health in a Globalized Economy: The Model of Effort-Reward Imbalance, pp. 333–363. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canguilhem, G.: Une pédagogie de la guérison est-elle possible? Écrits sur la médicine. Éditions du Seuil, Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clot, Y., Leplat, J.: La méthode clinique en ergonomie et en psychologie du travail. Le Travail Humain 4(68), 289–316 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    EU-OSHA: Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER-2). Overview Report: Managing Safety and Health at Work. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eurofound and EU-OHSA: Psychosocial Risks in Europe: Prevalence and Strategies for Prevention. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eurofound: Working Conditions and Workers’ Health. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2019)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreira, P.L., Melo, E.: Percepção de saúde e qualidade de vida: validação intercultural do perfil e saúde de Nottingham. Nursing 135, 23–29 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gollac, M., Bodier, M.: Mesurer les facteurs psychosociaux de risque au travail pour les maîtriser. Rapport du Collège d’expertise sur le suivi des risques psychosociaux au travail. Ministre du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunt, S.M., McEwen, J.: The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol. Health Illn. 2(3), 231–246 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ilies, R., Aw, S., Pluut, H.: Intraindividual models of employee well-being: what have we learned and where do we go from here? Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 24(6), 827–838 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Letellier, M.-C., Duchaine, C.S., Aubé, K., Talbot, D., Mantha-Bélisle, M.-M., Sultan-Taïeb, H., et al.: Evaluation of the Quebec healthy enterprise standard: effect on adverse psychosocial work factors and psychological distress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(3), 426 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nawito, Z., El-Azkalany, G., El-Sayad, M.: Nottingham health profile assessment of health-related quality of life in primary knee osteoarthritis patients: relation to clinical features and radiologic score. Egypt. Rheumatol. 40(4), 265–268 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Silva, C., Carnide, F., Barros, C., Cunha, L., Santos, M.: Reações emocionais reportadas ao trabalho: uma questão de mulheres? In: Proceedings Book of the International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene, pp. 362–370. Portuguese Society of Occupational Safety and Hygiene, SPOSHO (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silva, C., Barros, C., Cunha, L., Carnide, F., Santos, M.: Prevalence of back pain problems in relation to occupational group. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 52, 52–58 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stansfeld, S.A., Candy, B.: Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 32, 443–462 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yüksel, S., Elhan, A., Gökmen, D., Küçükdeveci, A., Kutlay, S.: Analyzing differential item functioning of the Nottingham Health Profile by Mixed Rasch Model. Turk. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 64(4), 300–307 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wieclaw, J., Agerbo, E., Bo Mortensen, P.: Psychosocial working conditions and the risk of depression and anxiety disorders in the Danish workforce. BMC Public Health 8, 280 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    WHO Health Impact of Psychosocial Hazards at Work: An Overview. World Health Organization, Geneva (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Fernando PessoaPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Escola Superior de SaúdeInstituto Politécnico do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do PortoCentro de Psicologia da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations