Advertisement

Ergonomic Analysis of a Pathological Anatomy Service in a Private Portuguese Hospital

  • Filipa CarvalhoEmail author
  • Rita Martins
  • Rui B. Melo
Chapter
  • 111 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 277)

Abstract

The main tasks performed in a pathological anatomy service often expose pathologists and other technicians to awkward and uncomfortable postures that, in combination with others risk factors may be responsible for the development of chronic pain syndromes. This paper focuses on estimating the prevalence of musculoskeletal and visual symptoms among these professionals and attempts to identify possible associations with their actual working conditions. Other objectives of this study were: identify the most painful tasks/workstations, characterize these in terms of the associated musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) development risk and, finally, identify and propose some preventive measures. To fulfill all these objectives, an ergonomic work analysis was done. Data were collected using a questionnaire specifically developed for this purpose. The Chi-square test and Cramer’s V coefficient were used to identify possible associations between variables (individual/work-related characteristics) and the prevalence of complaints (musculoskeletal or visual fatigue). Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) was the method used to quantify the risk associated to MSD development. The main results have highlighted that the work done in this pathological anatomy service entails risk factors such as high work intensity, awkward postures, turning knobs repeatedly, high cognitive and visual demands which may be responsible for the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and the high levels of eyestrain. Additionally, the RULA results revealed that the risk for the development of MSD is present in almost all tasks suggesting that investigation and adjustments in the work situation are relevant. The obtained results are in accordance with those reported by other studies.

Keywords

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) Visual fatigue Pathological anatomy service Rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) Binocular microscopes Microtomes Embedding centers Digital pathology 

References

  1. 1.
    Carvalho, F., Melo, R.B., Costa, V.: Ergonomic work analysis of a pathological anatomy service in a Portuguese Hospital. Adv. Saf. Manag. Hum. Factors Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 491, 449–462 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    George, E.: Occupational hazard for pathologists: microscope use and musculoskeletal disorders. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 133(4), 543–548 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martins, R., Carvalho, F., Melo, R.B.: Prevalence assessment of musculoskeletal and visual symptoms among pathological anatomy service workers. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 1012, 99–108 (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Navy Heath Research Center: Ergonomic Microscopes Reduce the Risk of Musculoskeletal Disorders at Naval Health Research Center’s Respiratory Disease Laboratory (Online). Available: https://www.public.navy.mil/navsafecen/Documents/SuccessStories/082_Ergo_Scopes.pdf. Accessed 01 Oct 2018
  5. 5.
    Maulik, S., Iqbal, R., De, A., Chandra, A.M.: Evaluation of the working posture and prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among medical laboratory technicians. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 27(4), 453–461 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Helaly, M., Elsherbeny, E., Haji, A., Assiri, M., Fadlelmula, A.: Reported musculoskeletal symptoms among laboratory workers, in relation to individual and work-related physical factors. Egypt. J. Occup. Med. 42(1), 79–92 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eurofound: Sixth European Working Conditions Survey—Overview Report (2017 update). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franco, G.: Health disorders and ergonomic concerns from the use of the microscope. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 135, 170–171 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson, S.K., Mason, E., Dukes, S.: Ergonomics and cytotechnologists: reported musculoskeletal discomfort. Diagn. Cytopathol. 29(6), 364–367 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arora, A., Uparkar, S.M.: Ergonomic risk assessment in pathology laboratory technicians. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 4(3), 15–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serranheira, F., Uva, A.S., Lopes, M.F.: Caderno Avulso #3 - Lesões Músculo-esqueléticas e Trabalho: Alguns métodos de Avaliação. Sociedade Portuguesa Medicina do Trabalho, Lisboa (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alcaraz-Mateos, E., Caballero-Alemán, F.: Problemas músculo-esqueléticos en patólogos españoles. Prevalencia y factores de riesgo. Rev. Espñola Patol. 48(1), 9–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McAtamney, L., Corlett, N.: Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Handb. Hum. Factors Ergon. Methods, pp. 7-1-7–11 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flavin, R.J., Guerin, M., O’Briain, D.S.: Occupational problems with microscopy in the pathology laboratory. Virchows Arch. 457(4), 509–511 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dzhodzhua, V., Serranheira, F., Sacadura-Leite, E., Sousa-Uva, A., Monteiro-Grillo, M.: Healthcare occupational visual demands and visual fatigue. In: International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene: SHO 2017, pp. 3–5 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIAUD (Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design), Faculdade de ArquiteturaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratório de Ergonomia, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaUniversidade de LisboaCruz-QuebradaPortugal

Personalised recommendations