Advertisement

Experimental Assessment of Thermal Sensation and Thermal Comfort of Sedentary Subjects: A Scoping Review

  • Daniele CostaEmail author
  • Joana C. Guedes
  • J. Santos Baptista
Chapter
  • 111 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 277)

Abstract

Background: Office workers spend most of their time engaged in sedentary tasks. Dissatisfaction with the thermal environment can reduce work efficiency and productivity. Objectives: This study presents the condensed results of a scoping review of the scientific literature assessing thermal sensation (TS) and thermal comfort (TC). The scoping review focuses on the experimental assessment of TS and TC. Eligibility criteria: The scoping review only considered peer-reviewed articles written in English. Grey literature, commissioned reports, and conference papers were excluded. Sources of evidence: The studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The search criteria considered the expression (“thermal comfort” OR “therm* sensation” OR “thermosensation”) AND (“sedentary”). Charting methods: The data charting process or data extraction was based on the preparation of tables to compile the key findings of the selected articles. Results and conclusions: In total, 39 peer-reviewed articles were considered suitable for the scoping review. The scoping review shows that the existing international standards to predict TC may fail when multisensorial aspects are considered, when TS and TC are assessed over different times during the exposure to a thermal environment, and when different populations are considered.

Keywords

Thermal sensation Thermal comfort Sedentary Scoping review 

References

  1. 1.
    Kim, Y., Welk, G.J.: Characterizing the context of sedentary lifestyles in a representative sample of adults: a cross-sectional study from the physical activity measurement study project. BMC Public Health 15, 1218 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thorp, A.A., et al.: Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9(1), 128 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moher, D., et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tricco, A.C., et al.: PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation the PRISMA-ScR statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 169(7), 467–473 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    SBRN: Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 37(3), 540–542 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arens, E., Zhang, H., Huizenga, C.: Partial and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort—part I: uniform environmental conditions. J. Therm. Biol 31(1), 53–59 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gagge, A.P., Stolwijk, J.A.J., Hardy, J.D.: Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures. Environ. Res. 1(1), 1–20 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moher, D., et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 6(7), e1000097 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garretón, J.Y., Rodriguez, R., Pattini, A.: Effects of perceived indoor temperature on daylight glare perception. Build. Res. Inf. 44(8), 907–919 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kakitsuba, N.: Effect of change in ambient temperature on core temperature of female subjects during the daytime and its sex differences. Int. J. Biometeorol. (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kakitsuba, N., White, M.D.: Effect of change in ambient temperature on core temperature during the daytime. Int. J. Biometeorol. 58(5), 901–907 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, J.Y., et al.: Does wearing thermal underwear in mild cold affect skin temperatures and perceived thermal sensation in the hands and feet of the elderly? J. Physiol. Anthropol. 27(6), 301–308 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kubo, H., Isoda, N., Enomoto-Koshimizu, H.: Cooling effects of preferred air velocity in muggy conditions. Build. Environ. 32(3), 211–218 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO: ISO 7730:2005—Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASHRAE: ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, United States of America (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Griffiths, I.D., McIntyre, D.A.: Sensitivity to temporal variations in thermal conditions. Ergonomics 17(4), 499–507 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, Y., Zhao, R.: Overall thermal sensation, acceptability and comfort. Build. Environ. 43(1), 44–50 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Du, C., et al.: Quantifying the cooling efficiency of air velocity by heat loss from skin surface in warm and hot environments. Build. Environ. 136, 146–155 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi, J.W., Lee, J.Y., Kim, S.Y.: Effects of thermal underwear on thermal and subjective responses in winter. J. Physiol. Anthropol. Appl. Human Sci. 22(1), 29–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McIntyre, D.A., Griffiths, I.D., Griffiths, I.D.: The effects of added clothing on warmth and comfort in cool conditions. Ergonomics 18(2), 205–211 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kwon, J., Choi, J.: The relationship between environmental temperature and clothing insulation across a year. Int. J. Biometeorol. 56(5), 887–893 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McIntyre, D.A.: Response to atmospheric humidity at comfortable air temperature: a comparison of three experiments. Ann. Work Exposures Health 21(2), 177–190 (1978)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berglund, L.G., Gonzalez, R.R.: Evaporation of sweat from sedentary man in humid environments. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 42(5), 767–772 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jin, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z.: Human responses to high humidity in elevated temperatures for people in hot-humid climates. Build. Environ. 114, 257–266 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kakitsuba, N.: Physiological responses to changes in relative humidity under thermally neutral, warm and hot conditions. J. Therm. Biol. 59, 86–91 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, J.Y., Nakao, K., Tochihara, Y.: Validity of perceived skin wettedness mapping to evaluate heat strain. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 111(10), 2581–2591 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rohles, Jr, F.H., Nevins, R.G.: Thermal comfort: new directions and standards. Aerosp. Med. 44(7) (1973)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toftum, J., Jørgensen, A.S., Fanger, P.O.: Upper limits for indoor air humidity to avoid uncomfortably humid skin. Energy Build. 28(1), 1–13 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fan, X., Liu, W., Wargocki, P.: Physiological and psychological reactions of sub-tropically acclimatized subjects exposed to different indoor temperatures at a relative humidity of 70%. Indoor Air 29(2), 215–230 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pellerin, N., Candas, V.: Effects of steady-state noise and temperature conditions on environmental perception and acceptability. Indoor Air 14(2), 129–136 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fanger, P.O., Breum, N.O., Jerking, E.: Can colour and noise influence man’s thermal comfort? Ergonomics 20(1), 11–18 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rohles, F.H., Wells, W.V.: Interior design. Comfort and thermal sensitivity. J. Inter. Des. 2(2), 36–44 (1976)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fanger, P.O., et al.: Thermal comfort conditions during day and night. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 33(4), 255–263 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fanger, P.O., Højbjerre, J., Thomsen, J.O.B.: Thermal comfort conditions in the morning and in the evening. Int. J. Biometeorol. 18(1), 16–22 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang, W., Moon, H.J.: Combined effects of acoustic, thermal, and illumination conditions on the comfort of discrete senses and overall indoor environment. Build. Environ. 148, 623–633 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beshir, M.Y., Ramsey, J.D.: Comparison between male and female subjective estimates of thermal effects and sensations. Appl. Ergon. 12(1), 29–33 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Castellani, J.W., et al.: Effect of localized microclimate heating on peripheral skin temperatures and manual dexterity during cold exposure. J. Appl. Physiol. 125(5), 1498–1510 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wyon, D.P., et al.: The mental performance of subjects clothed for comfort at two different air temperatures. Ergonomics 18(4), 359–374 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chow, T.T., et al.: Thermal sensation of Hong Kong people with increased air speed, temperature and humidity in air-conditioned environment. Build. Environ. 45(10), 2177–2183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chung, T.M., Tong, W.C.: Thermal comfort study of young Chinese people in Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 25(4), 317–328 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grivel, F., Candas, V.: Ambient temperatures preferred by young European males and females at rest. Ergonomics 34(3), 365–378 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Jin, L.: Thermal comfort of rural residents in a hot–humid area. Build. Res. Inf. 45(1–2), 209–221 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cheng, Y., Lin, Z.: Experimental investigation into the interaction between the human body and room airflow and its effect on thermal comfort under stratum ventilation. Indoor Air 26(2), 274–285 (2016)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Oseland, N.A.: Predicted and reported thermal sensation in climate chambers, offices and homes. Energy Build. 23(2), 105–115 (1995)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gonzales, B.R., et al.: Effects of polyester jerseys on psycho-physiological responses during exercise in a hot and moist environment. J. Strength Cond. Res. 25(12), 3432–3438 (2011)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    McIntyre, D.A.: Thermal sensation. A comparison of rating scales and cross modality matching. Int. J. Biometeorol. 20(4), 295–303 (1976)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hasebe, Y., Iriki, M., Takahasi, K.: Usefulness of R-R interval and its variability in evaluation of thermal comfort. Int. J. Biometeorol. 38(3), 116–121 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (PROA/LAETA), Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Environment and Planning, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM)University of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations