Advertisement

Expectations pp 147-167 | Cite as

The War that Bond Markets Did not Perceive as Such

The Prices of South African Bonds During the Second Anglo-Boer War: An Extreme Case of Resilience
  • Kim OosterlinckEmail author
  • Marie Van Gansbeke
Chapter
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (SSHET)

Abstract

When a conflict breaks out, warring states’ bond prices generally experience sharp declines. As military defeat may prompt the winner to ask for reparations, bonds issued by the losing party are usually even more affected. By contrast, during the Second Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902), the prices of the bonds issued by the South African Republic never fell below 96% of par and this despite the fact that the public believed South African defeat could not be avoided. We attribute this observation to investors’ belief that a British victory would lead to the assumption of the South African debt by the victor. Historical precedents and archival evidence show that this was by no means a foregone conclusion. Our analysis reveals the important role played by Rothschild, the underwriter. When the bond was first issued, Rothschild signalled that should a war break out the bond would be repaid. Once the war became reality, Rothschild was instrumental in making sure Great Britain would take over the loan.

References

Archival Sources

  1. The Rothschild Archive, London.Google Scholar
  2. The National Archives, Kew.Google Scholar
  3. The Insinger Bank Archive, Gemeente Amsterdam Stadsarchief, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Accominotti, O., Flandreau, M., & Rezzik, R. (2011). The spread of empire: Clio and the measurement of colonial borrowing costs. Economic History Review, 64(2), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, D. S. (2015). Contemporary perceptions of the First World War reflected in the capital markets. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 63(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alquist, R. (2010). How important is liquidity risk for sovereign bond risk premia? Evidence from the London stock exchange. Journal of International Economics, 82(2), 219–229.Google Scholar
  4. Blainey, G. (1965). Lost causes of the Jameson Raid. Economic History Review, 18(2), 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, W. O., & Burdekin, R. C. K. (2000). Turning points in the U.S. civil war: A British perspective. Journal of Economic History, 60(1), 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, W. O., & Burdekin, R. C. K. (2002). German debt traded in London during the Second World War: A British perspective on Hitler. Economica, 69(276), 655–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burdekin, R. C. K. (2006). Bondholders gains from the annexation of Texas and implications of the US Bailout. Explorations in Economic History, 43(4), 646–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdekin, R. C. K., & Laney, L. L. (2008). Financial market reactions to the overthrow and annexation of the Hawaiian Kingdom: Evidence from London, Honolulu and New York. Cliometrica, 2(2), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavaz, M., & Flandreau, M. (2017). High and dry’: The liquidity and credit of colonial and foreign government debt in the London Stock exchange (1880–1910). Journal of Economic History, 77(3), 653–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collet, S. (2012). Sovereign bonds: Odious debts and state succession. Ph.D. thesis. Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles. Google Scholar
  11. Collet, S. (2013). How big is the financial penalty for ‘unfair’ debt? The case of Cuban bonds at the time of independence. European Review of Economic History, 17(3), 364–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collet, S., & Oosterlinck, K. (2019). Denouncing odious debts. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 205–223.Google Scholar
  13. Dincecco, M. (2009). Political regimes and sovereign credit risk in Europe, 1750–1913. European Review of Economic History, 13(1), 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feilchenfeld, E. (1931). Public debts and state succession. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Flandreau, M., & Flores, J. H. (2009). Bonds and brands: Foundations of sovereign debt markets, 1820–1830. Journal of Economic History, 69(3), 646–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flandreau, M., Flores, J. H., Gaillard, N., & Nieto-Parra, S. (2009). The end of gate keeping: Underwriters and the quality of sovereign bond markets, 1815–2007. In NBER working papers 15128.Google Scholar
  17. Flandreau, M., Flores, J. H., Gaillard, N., & Nieto-Parra, S. (2011). The changing role of global financial brands in the underwriting of foreign government debt (1815–2010). In IHEID working papers. Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Frey, B. S., & Kucher, M. (2000). History as reflected in capital markets. The case of World War II. Journal of Economic History, 60(3), 468–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey, B. S., & Kucher, M. (2001). Wars and markets. How bond values reflect the Second World War. Economica, 68(271), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey, B. S., & Waldenström, D. (2004). Markets work in wars: The Zurich and Stockholm markets during World War II. Financial History Review, 11(2), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham, W. (1996). The Randlord’s bubble 1894–6/South African gold mines and stock market manipulation. In Discussion papers in economic and social history, n. 10. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Hoeflich, M. H. (1982). Through a glass darkly: Reflections upon the history of the international law of public debt in connection with state succession (pp. 39–70). University of Illinois Law Review.Google Scholar
  23. Hudson, R., & Urquhart, A. (2015). War and stock markets: The effect of World War Two on the British stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jopp, T. A. (2016). Contemporaries’ opinions of the Allied and Central Powers’ performance during the First World War:  Measuring turning points in perception with sovereign debt prices. European Review of Economic History, 20(2), 242–273.Google Scholar
  25. Kang, S. W., & Rockoff, H. (2015). Capitalizing patriotism: The liberty loans of World War I. Financial History Review, 22(1), 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katzenellenbogen, S. E. (1982). South Africa and Southern Mozambique: Labour, railways and trade in the making of a relationship. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Keith, A. B. (1907). The theory of state succession with special reference to English and colonial law. London: Waterlow and Sons Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Kerby, E. (2012). Financing the foe: A case study on the financing of an independent railway to the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek between 1882 and 1902. Paper prepared for the African Economic History Network meeting. Stellenbosch, July 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Klovland, J. T. (1994). Pitfalls in the estimation of the yield on British Consols, 1850–1914. The Journal of Economic History, 54(1), 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landon-Lane, J., & Oosterlinck, K. (2006). Hope Springs eternal: French Bondholders and the Soviet repudiation (1915–1919). Review of Finance, 10(4), 507–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lugan, B. (2010). Histoire de l’Afrique du Sud: des origines à nos jours. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  32. Meredith, M. (2007). Diamonds, gold and war. The Making of South Africa, London: Simon & Schuster UK Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Mitchener, K., & Weidenmier, M. (2005). Empire, public goods, and the Roosevelt corollary. Journal of Economic History, 65(3), 658–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchener, K., Oosterlinck, K., Weidenmier, M., & Haber, S. (2015). Victory or repudiation? Predicting winners in civil wars using international financial markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Occhino, F., Oosterlinck, K., & White, E. N. (2008). How much can a victor force the vanquished to pay? France under the Nazi boot. The Journal of Economic History, 68(1), 1–45.Google Scholar
  36. O’Connell, D. P. (1956). The law of state succession. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Omissi, D., & Thompson, A. (2002). The impact of the South African war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oosterlinck, K. (2013). Sovereign debt defaults: Insights from History. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(4), 697–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oosterlinck, K. (2016). Hope Springs Eternal. French Bondholders and the Repudiation of Russian Sovereign Debt (p. 264), Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Oosterlinck, K., & Ureche-Rangau, L. (2008). Multiple potential payers and sovereign bond prices. Finance, 29(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oosterlinck, K., Ureche-Rangau, L., & Vaslin, J. M. (2014). Baring, Wellington and the resurrection of French public finances following Waterloo. The Journal of Economic History, 74(4), 1072–1102.Google Scholar
  42. Oosterlinck, K., & Weidenmier, M. D. (2007). Victory or repudiation?: The probability of the Southern confederacy winning the Civil war. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  43. Pakenham, T. (1979). The Boer war. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  44. Pretorius, F. (2009). Historical dictionary of the Anglo-Boer War. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sicotte, R., Vizcarra, C., & Wandschneider, K. (2010). Military conquest and sovereign debt: Chile, Peru and the London bond market, 1876–1890. Cliometrica, 4(3), 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sussman, N., & Yafeh, Y. (2000). Institutions, reforms, and country risk: Lessons from Japanese government debt in the Meiji era. The Journal of Economic History, 60(2), 442–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Helten, J.-J. (1978). German capital, the Netherlands Railway Company and the political economy of the transvaal 1886–1900. The Journal of African History, 19(3), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Helten, J.-J. (1979). British capital, the British state and economic investment in South African 1886-1914. Collected Seminar Papers, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, 24, 1–17.Google Scholar
  49. van Helten, J.-J. (1982). Empire and high finance: South Africa and the international gold standard 1890–1914. The Journal of African History, 23(4), 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vizcarra, C. (2009). Guano, credible commitments, and sovereign debt repayment in nineteenth-century Peru. The Journal of Economic History, 69(2), 358–387.Google Scholar
  51. Waldenström, D., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Did nordic countries recognize the gathering storm of World War II? Evidence from the bond markets. Explorations in Economic History, 45(2), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weidemaier, M. C., & Gulati, G. M. (2015). The relevance of law to sovereign debt. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weidenmier, M. D. (2002). Turning points in the U.S. civil war: Views from the Grayback market. Southern Economic Journal, 68(4), 875–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weidemaier, M. C., & Gulati, G. M. (2016, February 28). Differing perceptions? Market practice and the evolution of foreign sovereign immunity (UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2739423).Google Scholar
  55. Weller, L. (2010). What is worst, trade crisis or revolution? Foreign creditors, sovereign debt and Bailouts in Brazil and Mexico, 1913–14. In Working paper.Google Scholar
  56. Wilburn, K. (1988). The nature of the Rothschild loan: International capital and South African railway diplomacy, politics, and construction 1891–1892. South African Journal of Economic History, 3(1), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Willard, K., Guinnane, T., & Rosen, H. (1996). Turning points in the civil war: Views from the Greenback market. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 1001–1018.Google Scholar
  58. Wilson, M. H., & Thompson, L. M. (1969). The Oxford history of South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zussman, A., Zussman, N., & Nielsen, M. Ø. (2008). Asset market perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Economica, 75(297), 84–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SBS-EM, CEBUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations