Advertisement

Norms of Practices and Pre-service Teacher Education for Multilingual Mathematics Classrooms in South Africa

  • Anthony A. EssienEmail author
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Multilingual Education Yearbook book series (MEYB)

Abstract

In any (mathematics) classroom, there are norms, whether explicit or implicit, that guide social interactions and classroom practice in general. In multilingual classrooms, such as the ones in South Africa where students come to school with varying levels of proficiency in both their home languages and English (the language of teaching and learning), the types of norms that are constituted in class determine the nature of student participation in mathematical activities. This chapter investigates the norms of practice that are prevalent in three mathematics teacher education classrooms and how these norms co-construct the classroom community. Data were collected through classroom observations of three teacher education classrooms at two Universities in South Africa. The data were qualitatively analysed using Wenger’s notion of participation and relating this notion to three types of norms: conversational, conceptual, and interpersonal norms. Findings revealed that the nature of norms in each of the three classrooms prepared the pre-service teachers differentially for teaching in multilingual classrooms. Recommendations are made for teacher education multilingual classrooms.

Keywords

Norms of practice Teacher education Discourse Participation Language diversity 

References

  1. Barwell, R. (2009). Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: An introductory discussion. In R. Barwell (Ed.), Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives (pp. 1–13). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bednarz, N. (1996). Language activity, conceptualization and problem solving: The role played by verbalisation in the development of mathematical thought in young children. In H. Mansfield, N. Pateman, & N. Bednarz (Eds.), Mathematics for tomorrow’s young children: International perspectives on curriculum (pp. 228–239). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, D., Xu, L., & Wan, V. (2013). Choral response as a significant form of verbal participation in mathematics classrooms in seven countries. In A. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 201–208). Kiel, Germany: PME.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2001). An approach for supporting teachers’ learning in social context. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 207–231). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conteh, J. (2000). Multilingual classrooms, standards and quality: Three children and a lot of bouncing balls. Language and Education, 14(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dooley, K. (2002). Genre-based pedagogy and cooperative learning: Integrating strategies to achieve high quality outcomes for ESL students in mainstream primary school classes. TESOL in Context, 11(2), 12–17.Google Scholar
  7. Esmonde, I. (2009). Explanations in mathematics classroom: A discourse analysis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(2), 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Essien, A. (2013). Preparing pre-service mathematics teachers for teaching in multilingual classrooms: A community of practice perspective. Unpublished Doctoral thesis. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  9. Essien, A., & Adler, J. (2016). Operationalising Wenger’s communities of practice theory for use in multilingual mathematics teacher education contexts. In A. Halai & P. Clarkson (Eds.), Teaching & learning mathematics in multilingual classrooms: Issues for policy, practice and teacher education (pp. 173–1930). Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2012). Classroom sociomathematical norms for proof presentation in undergraduate in abstract algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 401–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Güven, D., & Dede, Y. (2017). Examining social and sociomathematical norms in different classroom microcultures: Mathematics teacher education perspective. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 265–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0383.
  12. Khisty, L. L., & Morales, H. (2002). Discourse matters: Equity, access and Latino’s learning mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.icme-organisers.dk/tsg25/subgroups/khisty.doc.
  13. Lee, J.-S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of the development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  16. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. NCTM. (2013). Norms and mathematical proficiency. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(1), 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, S.-A., & Graven, M. (2018). Exploratory mathematics talk in a second language: A sociolinguistic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9840-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowland, T. (1995). Hedges in mathematics talk: Linguistic pointers to uncertainty. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(4), 327–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01273910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Setati, M. (2008). Access to mathematics versus access to the language of power: The struggle in multilingual mathematics classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 28, 103–116.Google Scholar
  22. Tusting, K. (2005). Language and power in communities of practice. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 36–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meanings: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163–201). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, T. (2005). Choral response in two six-grade mathematics classrooms in China: From discourse, pedagogical, and cultural perspectives. Ed.D. dissertation, Harvard University. United States, MA: Dissertations & Thesis, The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection (Publication No. AAT 3176361).Google Scholar
  25. Wang, T., & Murphy, J. (2004). An examination of coherence in a Chinese mathematics classroom. In L. Fan (Ed.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 107–123). London: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yackel, E. (2000). Creating a mathematics classroom environment that fosters the development of mathematical argumentation. Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress of Mathematical Education, Tokyo/Makuhari, Japan.Google Scholar
  28. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yackel, E., Rasmussen, C., & King, K. (2000). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), 275–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00051-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Young, D. (1995). Preparing teacher trainees to teach in multilingual classes. In K. Heugh, A. Siegruhn, & P. Pluddemann (Eds.), Multilingual Education for South Africa (pp. 107–112). Johannesburg: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations