Advertisement

3D Semantic-Rich Modelling of Underground Utility Networks

  • Adrian Preciados Royano
  • José Andrés Díaz Severiano
  • Valentín Gómez-Jáuregui
  • Cristina Manchado del Val
  • Julen López Iglesias
  • Olmo Fernández García
  • César Otero GonzálezEmail author
Conference paper
  • 130 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to document the state of art of the 3D semantic-rich modelling of underground utilities. To address this challenge, we develop a review of most common platforms used for 3D data modelling, mostly based on GIS or XML. We plan to detail what each platform is capable of: the information they can provide and their potential of displaying 3D models and information associated in portable devices for maintenance or any other field of work. Next, we carry out a case study where both capabilities and limitations of these kind of systems are described. In order to overcome limitations, we remark the relevance of automation and programming techniques as an auxiliary resource.

Keywords

3D model Data model Utility infrastructure Utility network Sematic-rich model BIM GIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Yan, J., Jaw, S.W., Son, R.V., Soon, K.H., Schrotter, G.: Three-dimensional data modelling for underground utility network mapping. Int. Arch. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 42-4, 711–745 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cazzaniga, N.E., Carrion, D., Migliaccio, F., Barzaghi, R.: A share database of underground utility lines for 3D mapping and GIS applications. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 40-4/W1, 105–108 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Open Geospatial CityGML Frontpage. https://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygml. Accessed 29 Mar 2019
  4. 4.
    Becker, T., Nagel, C., Kolbe, T.H.: Semantic 3D modeling of multi-utility networks in cities for analysis and 3D visualization. In: Progress and New Trends in 3D Geoinformation Sciences, pp. 41–62. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Mekawy, M., Östman, A., Hijazi, I.: A unified building model for 3D urban GIS. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 1, 120–145 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1020120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Den Duijin, X., Agugiaro, G., Zlatanova, S.: Modelling below- and above-ground utility network features with the CityGML utility network ADE: experiences from Rotterdam. ISPRS Ann. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 4-4/W7, 43–50 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ESRI Utility Network Management Frontpage. https://www.esri.es/producto/utility-network. Accessed 30 Mar 2019
  8. 8.
    Guerrero, J., Zlatanova, S., Meijers, M.: 3D visualization of underground pipelines: best strategy for 3D scene creation. ISPRS Ann. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2-2/W1, 139–145 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-ii-2-w1-139-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringUniversidad de CantabriaSantanderSpain
  2. 2.EgiCAD Research Group, School of Civil EngineeringUniversidad de CantabriaSantanderSpain

Personalised recommendations