Advertisement

Disaster Risk Assessment, Reduction and Resilience: Their Reciprocal Contribution with Urban Planning to Advance Sustainability

  • Daniele F. BignamiEmail author
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the Research for Development book series (REDE)

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the need for the inclusion in sustainable urban planning of the problem of the impact of disasters on cities and communities: disasters that will continue to occur and may well even become more frequent because of urban expansion, increasing population densities and climate change effects. To achieve this result, first of all some basic tools about disaster terminology, disaster trends and disaster risk computation are provided. Subsequently, the latest international decisions at global level to face disasters and climate change and to promote sustainability are explained and elucidated, showing their connections and synergies. In the final part, some originally selected elements on how to put in place strategies and those actions which are no longer deferrable are proposed.

References

  1. Amaratunga D, Malalgoda C, Haigh R, Panda A, Rahayu H (2018) Sound practices of disaster risk reduction at local level. Procedia Eng 212:1163–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AON (2018) Weather, climate & catastrophe insight 2018—annual report. http://catastropheinsight.aon.com
  3. Bignami DF (2014) Towards a territorial multi-disaster buildings’ resistance certification. Springer briefs in environmental science.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5223-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bignami DF, Rosso R, Sanfilippo U (2019) Flood proofing in urban areas. Springer, Switzerland, p 268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05934-7. ISBN 978-3-030-05933-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkmann J, von Teichman K (2010) Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: key challenges—scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustain Sci 5:171–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-010-0108-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreno ML, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S, Kienberger S, Keiler M, Alexander D, Zeil P, Welle T (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67:193–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blakely JE (2007) Urban planning for climate change. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Working paper, Lincoln Institute Product Code: WP07EB1Google Scholar
  8. Boccard N (2018) Natural disasters trends. SSRN Electron J.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116231
  9. Bosher L (2014) Built-in resilience through disaster risk reduction: operational issues. Build Res Inf 42(2):240–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.858203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters) (2017) Economic losses, poverty and disasters 1998–2017. School of Public Health Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de LouvainGoogle Scholar
  11. Dall’O’ G, Galante A, Ruggieri G (2008) Guida alla valorizzazione energetica degli immobile—Metodi, strumenti e tecnologie per la riqualificazione del patrimonio edilizio esistente, Il Sole24Ore. ISBN-13:9788832470444Google Scholar
  12. Egli T (2005) Protection des objects contre le danger naturels gravitationnel. AEAI—Association des établissements cantonaux d’assurance incendie. ISBN 3-003-00470-9Google Scholar
  13. Etinay N, Egbu C, Murray V (2018) Building urban resilience for disaster risk management and disaster risk reduction. Procedia Eng 212:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FEMA—Federal Emergency Management Agency (2015) Reducing flood risk to residential buildings that cannot be elevated. FEMA, p 1037Google Scholar
  15. Fournier M, Blas M (eds) (2012) Référentiel de travaux de prévention du risque d’inondation dans l’habitat existant, Ministère de l’égalité des Terri-toires et du Logement Ministère de l’écologie, du Développement durable et de l’énergie, Republique Française. http://www.cohesion-territoires.gouv.fr/inondations. 26 Mar 2019
  16. Geneletti D, La Rosa D, Spyra M, Cortinovis C (2017) A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan 165:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev 4(3):136–143.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guzzetti F (2000) Landslide fatalities and the evaluation of landslide risk in Italy. Eng Geol 58(2):89–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00047-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallegatte S, Vogt-Schilb A, Bangalore M, Rozenberg J (2017) Unbreakable—building the resilience of the poor in the face of natural disasters. World Bank Group, Washington, DC. ISBN (electronic): 978-1-4648-1004-6.  https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1003-9
  20. Hoeppe P (2016) Trends in weather related disasters—consequences for insurers and society. Weather Clim Extremes 11(Suppl C):70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (2012) In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA, 582 pp.Google Scholar
  22. IPCC (2014) In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Kelman I (2017) Linking disaster risk reduction, climate change, and the sustainable development goals. Disaster Prev Manag 26(3):254–258.  https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-02-2017-0043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirshen P, Ruth M, Anderson W (2008) Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of Metropolitan Boston USA. Clim Change 86:105.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9252-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kron W (2002) Flood risk = hazard × exposure × vulnerability. In: Wu M et al (eds) Flood defence. Science Press, New York, pp 82–97Google Scholar
  26. Leroux B, Peron O (2015) Renforcement des fenêtres dans la zone des effets de surpression d’intensité 20–50 mbar—Plan de Prévention des Risques Technologiques, INERIS and Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement, DRA-10-111924-09528c, Republique Française. www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr
  27. McBean GA (2012) Integrating disaster risk reduction towards sustainable development. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):122–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.002. ISSN 1877-3435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R, Thieken A (2010) Assessment of economic flood damage (review article). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1697–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Messner F, Penning-Rowsell E, Green C, Meyer V, Tunstall S, van der Veen A (2007) Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods. FLOODsite Project Deliverable D9.1, Contract No: GOCE-CT-2004-505420. Available at www.floodsite.net. Jan 2007
  30. METL—Ministère de l’égalité des Territoires et du Logement, MEDE—Ministère de l’écologie, du Développement durable et de l’énergie (2014) Référentiel de travaux de prevention du risque d’inondation dans l’habitat existant, Republique Française. www.territoires.gouv.fr, www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr
  31. Munich RE (2019) Relevant natural loss events worldwide 1980–2018. NatCatSERVICE, 06 Nov 2019Google Scholar
  32. Mysiak J, Surminski S, Thieken A, Mechler R, Aerts J (2016) Brief communication: Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction—success or warning sign for Paris? Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16(10):2189–2193.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2189-2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norton J, Atun F, Dandoulaki M (2015) Exploring issues limiting the use of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. TeMA J Land Use Mobil Environ ECCA15:135–154. ISSN 1970-9870Google Scholar
  34. Roberts NJ, Nadim F, Kalsnes B (2009) Quantification of vulnerability to natural hazards. Georisk: Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 3(3):164–173.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17499510902788850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rovida A, Locati M, Camassi R, Lolli B, Gasperini P (eds) (2016) CPTI15, the 2015 version of the Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. http://doi.org/10.6092/INGV.IT-CPTI15
  36. ISBN 978-0-7546-4431-6Google Scholar
  37. Swiss Re (2019) Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2018: “secondary” perils on the frontline, sigma n. 2/2019. Swiss Re InstituteGoogle Scholar
  38. Thieken AH, Ackermann V, Elmer F, Kreibich H, Kuhlmann B, Kunert U, Maiwald H, Merz B, Müller M, Piroth K, Schwarz J, Schwarze R, Seifert I, Seifert J (2008) Methods for the evaluation of direct and indirect flood losses In: 4th international symposium on flood defence: managing flood risk, reliability and vulnerability, Toronto, Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Ontario, Canada, 6–8 May 2008Google Scholar
  39. Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockström J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30:39–48.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiernan A, Drennan L, Nalau J, Onyango E, Morrissey L, Mackey B (2019) A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy Des Pract 2(1):53–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tyler S, Moench M (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim Dev 4:311–326.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.745389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. UNESCO (2001) In: Andjelkovic I (ed) Guidelines on non-structural measures in urban flood management—ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. UNISDR (The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) (2005) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. ISDR International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. www.unisdr.org/wcdr
  44. UNISDR (The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) (2015a) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030Google Scholar
  45. UNISDR (The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) (2015b) Chart of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. www.preventionweb.net/go/sfdrr
  46. UNISDR (The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) (2017) Technical guidance for monitoring and reporting on progress in achieving the global targets of the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction—collection of technical notes on data and methodologyGoogle Scholar
  47. United Nations Development Programme—UNDP (2010) Guidelines for designing disaster risk assessment projects—methodology and tools. Global Risk Identification Programme (GRIP), Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Chemin des Anémones, Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 11–13. http://www.gripweb.org
  48. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—UNFCCC (2015) Paris Agreement, Paris. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  49. United Nations—UN (2015) The sustainable development goals report, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. United Nations—UN (2016) General assembly, report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction, A/71/644Google Scholar
  51. Wamsler C (2004) Managing urban risk: perceptions of housing and planning as a tool for reducing disaster risk. Glob Built Environ Rev 4(2):11–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Project Development DepartmentFondazione Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations