Advertisement

Direct and Indirect Geometry of Architectural Paper Model: Images for Imagination

  • Martino PavignanoEmail author
  • Ursula Zich
  • Caterina Cumino
  • Maria L. Spreafico
  • Ornella Bucolo
  • Daniela Miron
Conference paper
  • 213 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1140)

Abstract

We present some remarks on the different communicative features of images generated by physical models for architecture, our study is part of an interdisciplinary research and educational project between Representation and Mathematics (with focus on Geometry). In particular, our work frames the problem of direct and indirect use of physical models, with attention to the constituent and readable geometry in the origami model (especially in its meaning of means to represent the architectural form).

Over time, physical models have undeniably played an important role in the educational path, mainly in activities carried out in close contact with the teaching staff. However, to date it is important to reflect on the possibility of effectively communicating models’ properties and prerogatives also through their synthetic representation, namely through a critically selected set of images, in order to construct a visual narration that can highlight their meaning.

Keywords

Physical model Architecture Geometry Communication Graphic visualization Origami 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For the author M. Pavignano the contribution was developed within the research project M.A.G.I.A.: Mathematics Architecture Geometry. Interconnections and Applications.

Although the contribution was conceived jointly, paragraphs were authored by: 1 M. Pavignano; 2 C. Cumino and U. Zich; 3, 3.2 C. Cumino, M. Pavignano and U. Zich, 3.1 D. Miron with O. Bucolo, 4 C. Cumino, M. Pavignano, M.L. Spreafico and U. Zich.

The pictures presented in the paper were technically supported by the Laboratory of Architectural Survey and Documentation (Laboratorio di Rilievo e Documentazione – RILDOC), Politecnico di Torino, Department of Architecture and Design. Scientific Coordinator prof. arch. P. Davico, Technical Coordinators arch. O. Bucolo and arch. D. Miron.

Pictures credits: Figs. 3, 6c/d, 7c/d, 8 D. Miron (Nikon D3, 50 mm lens); Figs. 2b, 3b scanned with Olivetti dCopia4500MF plus; Figs. 1, 9, 10 M. Pavignano (iPhone 7 plus); Fig. 4 were extracted from a video made in 2018 by P. Farina during his trainee at Polito DISMA with the Centro Studi Residenze Reali Sabaude in Venaria Reale, Italy.

Crease Patterns credits: Fig. 6a C. Cumino, M. Pavignano, M.L. Spreafico and U. Zich; Fig. 7a E. Frigerio.

All our models were folded by C. Cumino.

All graphic elaborations were made by M. Pavignano.

References

  1. Akitaya, H.A., Mitani, J., Kanamori, Y., Fukui, Y.: Unfolding simple folds from crease patterns. In: 6OSME. The 6th International Meeting on Origami in Science, Mathematics and Education. Part 1. Mathematics of Origami, Tokio, Japan, 10–13 August 2014, pp. 85–96 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. Albisinni, P.: L’analisi grafica dell’architettura: dall’analogico al digitale. In: Albisinni, P., De Carlo, L. (eds.) Architettura disegno modello. Verso un archivio digitale dell’opera di maestri del XX secolo. Gangemi, pp. 65–76 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Armand, P., Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M.L., Zich, U.: Geometry and origami to share cultural heritage: results of the experimentation “The King and the Origami” at the Royal Residence of Venaria. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Bridges Conference on Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Education, Culture, Stockholm, Sweden, 25–28 July 2018, pp. 375–378 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. Barlozzini, P.: Il modello fisico in architettura. Uno strumento di rappresentazione tanto arcaico quanto attuale, 2nd edn. Aracne, Rome (2013)Google Scholar
  5. Bianchini, C.: Dal reale al virtuale (e ritorno): il modello ligneo di Antonio da Sangallo per il Nuovo San Pietro in Vaticano. Disegnare Idee Immagini 34, 36–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M.L., Zich, U.: Teaching geometry and surfaces evaluation through graphic representation and dynamic paper models. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Geometry and Graphics, ICGG 2018, Milan, Italy, 3–7 August 2019, pp. 1523–1532 (2019)Google Scholar
  7. Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M.L., Zich, U.: The Mole Antonelliana between real shape and folding design. In: Origami7, The Proceedings from the 7th International Meeting on Origami in Science, Mathematics and Education. Design, Education, History, and Science, vol. 1, Oxford, Great Britain, 5–7 September 2018, pp. 73–88 (2018a)Google Scholar
  8. Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M.L., Zich, U.: The Origami model as geometrical extension of Visual Thinking. Rappresentazione/Materiale/Immateriale. Drawing as (in)tangible representation. In: 40th International Conference of Representation Disciplines Teachers. XV Congress of Unione Italiana per il Disegno, Milan, Italy, 13–15 September 2018, pp. 1279–1286 (2018b)Google Scholar
  9. Cumino, C., Pavignano, M., Spreafico, M.L., Zich, U.: Paper models for the understanding of architectural shape: research, design, testing and teaching in a dialogue between geometry and representation. Territories and frontiers of representation. In: 39th International Conference of Representation Disciplines Teachers. XIV Congress of Unione Italiana per il Disegno, Naples, Italy, 14–16 September 2017, pp. 1279–1286 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. Castelnuovo, E.: L’insegnamento della matematica nella scuola preelementare e elementare. Scuola e città 3, 93–98 (1957)Google Scholar
  11. Demaine, E.D., Demaine, M.L., Hart, V., Price, G.N., Tachi, T.: (Non)Existence of pleated folds: how paper folds between creases. Graphs Comb. 27, 377–397 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Docci, M.: La Basilica vaticana non costruita. L’opera di Antonio da Sangallo. Disegnare, idee immagini 34, 24–35 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, M., Krausse, J.: Folding and geometry: Buckminster Fuller’s provocation of thinking. In: Friedman, M., Schäffner, W. (eds.) On Folding. Towards a New Field of Interdisciplinary Research, pp. 139–174. Transcript, Bielefeld (2016)Google Scholar
  14. Gay, F.: L’incontenibile concretezza dell’eidos: ideazione ed evoluzione degli artefatti. Idee per la Rappresentazione 7. Visualità. Atti del seminario di studi. Aversa, 9 May 2015, pp. 161–180 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. Hemmerling, M., De Falco, C.: ArchiFold: an educational approach for the integration of mathematics in the architecture curriculum. In: Conference Book: Nexus Architecture and Mathematics 2018, pp. 221–226. Kim Williams Books (2018)Google Scholar
  16. Klein, F.: The Evanston Colloquium Lectures on Mathematics. Macmillan and Co., London (1894)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Lang, R.J.: Twist, Tiling and Tessellations: Mathematical Methods for Geometric Origami. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Lang, R.J.: Origami Design Secrets: Mathematical Methods for an Ancient Art, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luigini, A.: “Immagini?” as an interdisciplinary proposal. In: Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Conference IMMAGINI? Image and Imagination Between Representation, Communication, Education and Psychology, Brixen, Italy, 27–28 November 2017 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1091109
  20. Marotta, A., Spallone, R., Lo Turco, M., Zich, U., Vitali, M., Marchis, E.T.C., Pavignano, M.: Visual images and language in architecture: signifier semiotics and meaning semiotics. In: Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Conference IMMAGINI? Image and Imagination Between Representation, Communication, Education and Psychology, Brixen, Italy, 27–28 November 2017 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1090964
  21. Megahed, N.A.: Origami folding and its potential for architecture students. Des. J. 20(2), 279–297 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribichini, L.: I Modelli. Storie di diverse vicende e realizzazioni. Disegnare Idee Immagini 34, 50–61 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. Rizzi, R., Pisciella, R., Rossetto, A.: Il Daimon di Architettura. Manuale, vol. 2. Mimesis (2014)Google Scholar
  24. Scolari, M.: Il disegno obliquo. Una storia dell’antiprospettiva. Venezia, Marsilio (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Solima, L.: Il museo in ascolto. Nuove strategie di comunicazione per i musei statali. Rubettino Editore, Soveria Mannelli (2012)Google Scholar
  26. Ugo, V.: Mìmesis. Sulla critica della rappresentazione dell’architettura. Maggioli (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martino Pavignano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ursula Zich
    • 1
  • Caterina Cumino
    • 2
  • Maria L. Spreafico
    • 2
  • Ornella Bucolo
    • 1
  • Daniela Miron
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Design (DAD)Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical Sciences “G. L. Lagrange” (DISMA)Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations