Advertisement

Militant Consociational Democracy: The Political Exclusion of the Extreme Right in Belgium

  • Matthijs BogaardsEmail author
Chapter
  • 26 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict book series (PSCAC)

Abstract

Consociational democracies seek to pacify societal divisions through political inclusion and compromise. Militant democracies seek to neutralize threats to democracy and liberal values by excluding anti-system parties from power. As one type of democracy is based on inclusion and the other on exclusion, militant consociational democracy would seem a contradiction in terms. However, Belgium presents just this perplexing combination of features. The same parties that work together across the country’s linguistic divisions in an elaborate consociational federation have systematically boycotted the Flemish and francophone extreme-right parties. This chapter is the first to examine the phenomenon of “militant consociational democracy”, tracing its historical roots and considering its implications.

Keywords

Consociationalism Extreme right Militant democracy Political party ban Belgium Federalism Language Deliberative democracy Compromise Immigration 

Bibliography

  1. Abts, K. (2015). Attitudes Towards a Cordon Sanitaire Vis-à-Vis Extremist Parties: Instrumental Pragmatism, Affective Reactions, and Democratic Principles. Ethical Perspectives, 22(4), 667–698.Google Scholar
  2. Agarin, T., McCulloch, A., & Murtagh, C. (2018). Others in Deeply Divided Societies: A Research Agenda. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 24(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkerman, T., & Rooduijn, M. (2015). Pariahs or Partners? Inclusion and Exclusion of Radical Right Parties and the Effects on Their Policy Positions. Political Studies, 63(5), 1140–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andeweg, R. (2019). Consociationalism in the Low Countries: Comparing the Dutch and Belgian Experience. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(4), 408–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andeweg, R., De Winter, L., & Müller, W. (2008). Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Consociational Democracies: Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1–2), 77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Art, D. (2008). The Organizational Origins of the Contemporary Radical Right: The Case of Belgium. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bale, T. (2007). Are Bans on Political Parties Bound to Turn Out Badly? A Comparative Investigation of Three ‘Intolerant’ Democracies: Turkey, Spain, and Belgium. Comparative European Politics, 5(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blas, A. (2018). Power-Sharing Coalitions in the Basque Country (1987–1998), Centripetal Coalitions vs Consociational Coalitions. Nations and Nationalism, 24(4), 998–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bligh, G. (2013). Defending Democracy: A New Understanding of the Party-Banning Phenomenon. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 46(5), 1321–1379.Google Scholar
  10. Bodson, T., & Loizides, N. (2017). Consociationalism in the Brussels Capital Region: Dis-Proportional Representation and the Accommodation of National Minorities. In A. McCulloch & J. McGarry (Eds.), Power-Sharing: Empirical and Normative Challenges (pp. 87–102). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bogaards, M. (2000). The Uneasy Relationship Between Empirical and Normative Types in Consociational Theory. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(4), 395–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bogaards, M. (2005). The Italian First Republic: ‘Degenerated Consociationalism’ in a Polarised Party System. West European Politics, 28(3), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bogaards, M. (2017). Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and Majoritarian Democracy. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Available at: http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-65
  14. Bourne, A., & Casal Bértoa, F. (2017). Mapping ‘Militant Democracy’: Variation in Party Ban Practices in European Democracies (1945–2015). European Constitutional Law Review, 13(2), 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Breuning, M. (1997). Nationalism and Nationalist Parties: A Comparison of the Flemish Volksunie and Vlaams Blok. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 3(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caluwaerts, D. (2012). Confrontation and Communication: Deliberative Democracy in Divided Belgium. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Caluwaerts, D., & Deschouwer, K. (2014). Building Bridges Across Political Divides: Experiments on Deliberative Democracy in Deeply Divided Belgium. European Political Science Review, 6(3), 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2014). Does Inter-Group Deliberation Foster Inter-Group Appreciation? Evidence from Two Experiments in Belgium. Politics, 34(2), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2015). Combining Federalism with Consociationalism: Is Belgian Consociational Federalism Digging Its Own Grave? Ethnopolitics, 14(3), 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Capoccia, G. (2005). Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Capoccia, G. (2013). Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self-Preservation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coffé, H. (2005a). Extreem-Rechts in Vlaanderen en Wallonië: Het Verschil. Roeselare: Roularta Books.Google Scholar
  23. Coffé, H. (2005b). The Adaptation of the Extreme Right’s Discourse: The Case of the Vlaams Blok. Ethical Perspectives, 12(2), 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Damen, S. (2001). Strategieën Tegen Extreem-Rechts: Het Cordon Sanitaire Onder de Loep. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 22(1), 89–109.Google Scholar
  25. Dandoy, R. (2014). Regionalist Parties and Immigration in Belgium. In E. Hepburn & R. Zapata-Barrero (Eds.), The Politics of Immigration in Multilevel States: Governance and Political Parties (pp. 200–222). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Cleen, B. (2016). Representing the People: The Articulation of Nationalism and Populism in the Rhetoric of the Vlaams Belang. In J. Jamin (Ed.), L’Extrême Droite en Europe (pp. 223–242). Brussels: Éditions Bruylant.Google Scholar
  27. De Lange, S., & Akkerman, T. (2012). Populist Parties in Belgium: A Case of Hegemonic Liberal Democracy? In C. Mudde & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? (pp. 27–45). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Wever, B. (1994). Greep Naar de Macht: Vlaams-Nationalisme en Nieuwe Orde, Het VNV 1933–1945. Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
  29. Delwit, P. (2007). The Belgian National Front and the Question of Power. In P. Delwit & P. Poirier (Eds.), The Extreme Right Parties and Power in Europe (pp. 141–166). Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  30. Delwit, P. (2012). L’Exception Belge. In M.-C. Esposito, A. Laquièze, & C. Manigand (Eds.), Populismes: L’Envers de la Démocratie (pp. 111–121). Paris: Vendémiaire.Google Scholar
  31. Deschouwer, K. (2001). De Zorgeloze Consensus: De Statuten van het Vlaamse Blok en de Partijentheorie. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 20(1), 63–88.Google Scholar
  32. Deschouwer, K. (2006). And the Peace Goes on? Consociational Democracy and Belgian Politics in the Twenty-First Century. West European Politics, 29(5), 895–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Deschouwer, K. (2009). The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Dierickx, G. (1978). Ideological Oppositions and Consociational Attitudes in the Belgian Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 3(1), 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Downs, W. (2001). Pariahs in Their Midst: Belgian and Norwegian Parties React to Extremist Threats. West European Politics, 24(3), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Downs, W. (2002). How Effective Is the Cordon Sanitaire? Lessons from Efforts to Contain the Far Right in Belgium, France, Denmark and Norway. Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, 4(1), 32–51.Google Scholar
  37. Downs, W. (2012). Political Extremism in Democracies: Combating Intolerance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dumoulin, M., Gerard, E., Dujardin, V., & Van den Wijngaert, M. (2006). Nieuwe Geschiedenis van België II: 1905–1950. Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
  39. Dunn, J. (1972). “Consociational Democracy” and Language Conflict: A Comparison of the Belgian and Swiss Experiences. Comparative Political Studies, 5(1), 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Erk, J. (2005). From Vlaams Blok to Vlaams Belang: The Belgian Far-Right Renames Itself. West European Politics, 28(3), 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fennema, M. (1997). Extreem-Rechts en de Democratie. Socialisme en Democratie, 54(2), 51–62.Google Scholar
  42. Fitzmaurice, J. (1992). The Extreme Right in Belgium: Recent Developments. Parliamentary Affairs, 45(3), 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fox, G., & Nolte, G. (2000). Intolerant Democracies. In G. Fox & B. Roth (Eds.), Democratic Governance and International Law (pp. 389–435). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Frognier, A.-P. (1988). The Mixed Nature of Belgian Cabinets Between Majority Rule and Consociationalism. European Journal of Political Research, 16(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gerard, E. (1985). De Katholieke Partij in Crisis: Partijpolitiek Leven in België (1918–1940). Leuven: Kritak.Google Scholar
  46. Geys, B., Heyndels, B., & Vermeir, J. (2006). Explaining the Formation of Minimal Coalitions: Anti-System Parties and Anti-Pact Rules. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 957–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Golder, M. (2016). Far Right Parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harell, A. (2010). The Limits of Tolerance in Diverse Societies: Hate Speech and Political Tolerance Norms Among Youth. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hodgson, G. (2006). What Are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hossay, P. (1996). ‘Our People First!’ Understanding the Resonance of the Vlaams Blok’s Xenophobic Programme. Social Identities, 2(3), 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huyse, L. (1970). Passiviteit, Pacificatie en Verzuiling in de Belgische Politiek: Een Sociologische Studies. Antwerpen: Standaard Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
  52. Issscharoff, S. (2015). Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacoby, W. (2017). Grand Coalitions and Democratic Dysfunction: Two Warnings from Central Europe. Government and Opposition, 52(2), 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jamin, J. (2005). Faut-il Interdire les Partis d’extrême Droite? Démocratie, droite et Extrême Droite. Brussels: Éditions Luc Pire.Google Scholar
  55. Joppke, C. (2008). Comparative Citizenship: A Restrictive Turn in Europe? Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2(1). Article 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirshner, A. (2014). A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Koskenniemi, M. (2000). Whose Intolerance, Which Democracy? In G. Fox & B. Roth (Eds.), Democratic Governance and International Law (pp. 436–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  59. Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of Democratic Systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1(1), 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational Democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lijphart, A. (1981). The Belgium Example of Cultural Coexistence in Comparative Perspective. In A. Lijphart (Ed.), Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium: The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society (pp. 1–12). Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  63. Loewenstein, K. (1937a). Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I. American Political Science Review, 31(3), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Loewenstein, K. (1937b). Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, II. American Political Science Review, 31(4), 638–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Loobuyck, P., & Jacobs, D. (2010). Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Integration Policy in Belgium and Flanders. Canadian Journal for Social Research, 3(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
  66. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  67. McGarry, J., & Loizides, N. (2016). Power-Sharing in a Re-United Cyprus: Centripetal Coalitions vs. Proportional Sequential Coalitions. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4), 847–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2016). Power-Sharing Executives: Consociational and Centripetal Formulae and the Case of Northern Ireland. Ethnopolitics, 15(5), 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Meijer, E. (2015). The Radical Left in Benelux. Socialism and Democracy, 29(3), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mouffe, C. (2005). The ‘End of Politics’ and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 50–71). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  71. Mudde, C. (2004). Defending Democracy and the Extreme Right. In R. Eatwell & C. Mudde (Eds.), Western Democracies and the New Extreme Right Challenge (pp. 193–211). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Mudde, C. (2013). Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What? European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Müller, J.-W. (2016). Protecting Popular Self-Government from the People? New Normative Perspectives on Militant Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Obler, J., Steiner, J., & Diericks, G. (1977). Decision-Making in Smaller Democracies: The Consociational “Burden”. Beverly Hills: Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics.Google Scholar
  76. Pauwels, T. (2011). Explaining the Strange Decline of the Populist Radical Right Vlaams Belang in Belgium: The Impact of Permanent Opposition. Acta Politica, 46(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rijpkema, B. (2018). Militant Democracy Beyond Loewenstein: George van de Bergh’s 1936 Inaugural Lecture. In A. Ellian & B. Rijpkema (Eds.), Militant Democracy: Political Science, Law and Philosophy (pp. 117–152). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rixen, T., & Viola, L. (2015). Putting Path Dependence in Its Place: Toward a Taxonomy of Institutional Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 27(2), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rummens, S., & Abts, K. (2010). Defending Democracy: The Concentric Containment of Political Extremism. Political Studies, 58(4), 649–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Seiler, D. (1997). Un Système Consociatif Exemplaire: La Belgique. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 4(3), 601–624.Google Scholar
  81. Sinardet, D. (2010). From Consociational Consciousness to Majoritarian Myth: Consociational Democracy, Multi-Level Politics and the Belgian Case of Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde. Acta Politica, 45(3), 346–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stojanović, N. (2018). Political Marginalization of “Others” in Consociational Regimes. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 12(4), 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taylor, P., & Lijphart, A. (1985). Proportional Tenure vs Proportional Representation: Introducing a New Debate. European Journal of Political Research, 13(4), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thiel, M. (Ed.). (2009). The ‘Militant Democracy’ Principle in Modern Democracies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  85. Tyulkina, S. (2015). Militant Democracy: Undemocratic Political Parties and Beyond. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Haute, E., Pauwels, T., & Sinardet, D. (2018). Sub-State Nationalism and Populism: The Cases of Vlaams Belang, New Flemish Alliance and DéFI in Belgium. Comparative European Politics, 16(6), 954–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Van Spanje, J. (2010). Parties Beyond the Pale: Why Some Political Parties Are Ostracized by Their Competitors While Others Are Not. Comparative European Politics, 8(3), 354–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Spanje, J., & van der Brug, W. (2007). The Party as Pariah: The Exclusion of Anti-Immigration Parties and Its Effect on Their Ideological Positions. West European Politics, 30(5), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wagrandl, U. (2018). Transnational Militant Democracy. Global Constitutionalism, 7(2), 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walgrave, S., & de Swert, K. (2004). The Making of the (Issues of the). Vlaams Blok. Political Communication, 21(4), 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zolberg, A. (1978). Belgium. In R. Grew (Ed.), Crises of Development in Europe and the United States (pp. 99–138). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceCentral European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations