Advertisement

Chasing Ghosts in Cuba

  • Robert W. BalohEmail author
  • Robert E. Bartholomew
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides a broad overview of a mysterious novel clinical entity featuring mild brain damage and an array of cognitive deficits that reportedly afflicted American and Canadian diplomats stationed in Havana, Cuba, beginning in November 2016. While explanations for what has been dubbed ‘Havana Syndrome’ range from acoustical weapons to microwaves, and even pesticide exposure, these hypotheses are inconsistent with the evidence. Furthermore, the irregular patterning of the episode is inconsistent with an infectious disease agent, but instead closely follows social networks. Unfortunately, US State Department doctors opted for the most exotic hypothesis early on – that they were the victims of a secret sonic weapon from a hostile government, while ignoring mundane explanations. While many diplomats reported hearing an unusual sound accompanying their symptoms, an analysis of recordings of ‘attacks’ identified them as crickets and cicadas. The result is one of the strangest stories in the history of science: insect mating calls were mistaken for a sonic attack, engendering anxiety and triggering an outbreak of psychogenic illness that has damaged Cuba-American relations. The financial toll has been high, with the US government spending millions of dollars and tying up valuable resources to investigate this case while costing the Cuban government tens of millions of dollars in potential tourist revenue from negative publicity.

Keywords

Mass psychogenic illness Mass sociogenic illness Collective unexplained symptoms Conversion disorder Mass hysteria Functional neurological symptom disorder Anxiety Public health Nocebo effect Contested diagnoses The politics of illness 

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas WI. The child in America. New York: Alfred Knopf; 1932. p. 572.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vergano D. The US government botched its investigation into the mysterious ‘sonic attack’ in Cuba, emails reveal. BuzzFeed News. 29 May 2019.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nauert H. US Department of State press briefing. Washington, DC. 28 Sept 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilkinson T. Did covert spy gear cause U.S. and Canadian diplomats in Cuba to lose their hearing? Los Angeles Times Online. 10 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swanson R, Hampton S, Green-McKenzie J, Diaz-Arrastia R, Grady M, Ragini V, et al. Neurological manifestations among US government personnel reporting directional audible and sensory phenomena in Havana, Cuba. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1125–33.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkinson T. The mystery of ‘sonic’ attacks in Cuba deepens; U.S. diplomats suffered brain injuries… Los Angeles Times. 20 Feb 2018;Sect. A:2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeYoung K. Neurological injuries found in U.S. staff in Cuba. The Washington Post. 15 Feb 2018;Sect. A:15.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matthew L. Cuba denies role in ‘sonic attacks’ that left U.S. diplomats with brain damage. Time. 19 Sept 2017. p. 79.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonard T. Damning evidence. Daily Mail (London). 22 Sept 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finnegan C. Stunning new details in first medical report on US personnel in Cuba. ABC News (American Broadcasting Company, New York). 14 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stone J. The bare essentials: functional symptoms in neurology. Neurol Pract. 2009;9:179–89.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.177204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hitt J. Hear no evil. Vanity Fair. 2019;61(2):48. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/the-real-story-behind-the-havana-embassy-mystery. Accessed 22 Oct 2019Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Entous A, Anderson JL. Havana syndrome. The New Yorker. 2018;94(37):34–47. On September 11, 2018, one of the State Department employees who was sent home from Havana, contacted Robert Bartholomew. In a subsequent interview on January 3, 2019, they related the information about The New Yorker piece, and told him: “A number of us are similarly skeptical and frustrated by the main scientists and doctors with whom State has been working, and by their failure to explore thoroughly, seriously, the possibility of mass psychogenic illness. Their reasons for discounting it as a possibility are not founded in fact.” While they were not one of the patients in the JAMA study, they expressed concern with claims that some staff were unaware that others were hearing sounds and feeling unwell and observed that “we all knew intimate details about each others’ issues.”Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lederman J. US tourist fears he was hit in Cuba, years before diplomats. The Associated Press. 19 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jenks S. What really happened? The secret sonic war. Podcast created on 2018 Sept 27. https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/what-really happened/e/56431028?autoplay=true. Accessed 23 June 2019.
  16. 16.
    Nauert H. US Department of State press briefing. Washington, DC. 9 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rubio M. Rubio statement on Castro regime harming U.S. diplomats in Cuba. Press release. 9 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs issues statement addressing allegations by the U.S. Granma (Havana, Cuba). 2017 Aug 9. Granma is the official newspaper of the Central Committee of the Cuban Communist Party.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee M, Weissenstein M. Hearing loss of US diplomats in Cuba blamed on covert device. The Washington Post. 9 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nauert H. US Department of State Press Briefing. 14 Sept and 4 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rubio M. Rubio, colleagues ask Tillerson to expel Cubans, close embassy after attacks on U.S. diplomats. Press release. 15 Sept 2017.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blitzer W. Trump and McConnell news conference. CNN News airing between 2 and 2:30 p.m. ET. 16 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cuba could stop ‘attacks’ against Americans: white house. Reuters. 13 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lederman J, Lee M. Tillerson says Cuba still risky, but FBI doubts sonic attack occurred. Savannah Morning News (GA). 9 Jan 2018. p. 5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.S. Policy Toward Cuba, Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, 115th Congress, Second Session. 6 Sept 2018.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Torres N. Bolton: somebody must be held accountable in Cuba attacks. Miami Herald. 1 Nov 2018.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lederman J. US: a few visitors to Cuba claim symptoms similar to attacks. The Associated Press News. 6 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Attacks on U.S. diplomats in Cuba: response and oversight. US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere, Transnational Crime, Civilian Security, Democracy, Human Rights, and Global Women’s Issues. Attacks on US diplomats in Cuba. Video of the complete hearing published 2018 Jan 9. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/hearings/attacks-on-us-diplomats-in -cuba-response-and-oversight-010918. Accessed 22 July 2019.
  29. 29.
    Dorsey S. Uzbekistan incident raises suspicions of Russian involvement in Cuba attacks. CBS News. 28 Nov 2017.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris G. 25th person at U.S. embassy in Cuba is mysteriously sickened. The New York Times. 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kuo L. ‘Sonic attack’ fears as more US diplomats fall ill in China. The Guardian. 7 June 2018.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Myers SL. More Americans evacuated from China over mysterious ailments. The New York Times. 30 June 2018.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weinberger S. Scientists say ‘neuroweapons’ were behind Cuba attacks. Yahoo News. 10 Sept 2018.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brain abnormalities found in victims of US embassy attack in Cuba. The Guardian. 6 Dec 2017.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Selk A. How bizarre events in Cuba changed embassy workers’ brains: U.S. embassy workers woke in the night to strange hums or chirping, and some experienced physical changes in the brain. The Washington Post Blog. 6 Dec 2017.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Doctors find brain abnormalities in victims of Cuba mystery. Philadelphia Inquirer. 10 Dec 2017. p. 9.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guthrie S. NBC News Today. 6 Dec 2017.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cuba: Tillerson says diplomatic people in Cuba were ‘targeted.’ Asia News Monitor (Bangkok, Thailand). 8 Dec 2017.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Embassy staff in Cuba left with brain injuries: world bulletin. The Daily Telegraph. 7 Dec 2017. p. 15.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zimmer C. A ‘sonic attack’ on diplomats in Cuba? These scientists doubt it. The New York Times. 5 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sonic weapons evidence far from sound following ‘attacks’ in Cuba and China. University of Southampton press release. 20 June 2018.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kornbluh P. Trump’s non-sonic attack on Cuba. The Nation. 5 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lederman J, Weissenstein M, Lee M. Cuba mystery grows: new details on what befell US diplomats. The Chicago Tribune. 15 Sept 2017.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Loria K. US diplomats returned from Cuba with brain injuries and hearing loss, and mysterious ‘sonic weapons’ could be to blame. Business Insider Australia. 16 Sept 2017.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gearan A. U.S. investigating whether American diplomats were victims of sonic attack in Cuba. The Washington Post. 10 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Felipe C. Katy Perry roar at anti-APEC rallyists. The Philippine Star. 20 Nov 2015.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Evers M. The weapon of sound: sonic canon gives pirates an earful. Der Spiegel. 2015 Nov 15. https://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/the-weapon-of-sound-sonic-canon-gives-pirates-an-earful-a-385048.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2019.
  48. 48.
    Clark H. The mandrake fiend. Folklore. 1962;73(4):257–69.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jauchem J. High-intensity acoustics for military nonlethal applications. Mil Med. 2007;72:182–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mitchell A, Murray M, Abou-Sabe K. Cubans forcefully reject blame for U.S, diplomats’ mystery ailments. NBC News. 2017 Oct 25. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cubans-forcefully-reject-blame-u-s-diplomats-mystery-ailments-n813581. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.
  51. 51.
    Lederman J, Weissenstein M. Dangerous sound? What Americans heard in Cuba attacks? The Associated Press. 13 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stubbs A, Montealegre-Zapata F. Recording of ‘sonic attacks’ on U.S. diplomats in Cuba spectrally matches the echoing call of a Caribbean cricket. bioRxiv 510834; doi:  https://doi.org/10.1101/510834. Researchers identified six separate independent lines of evidence to support their conclusions including 1) a carrier frequency of 7 kHz; 2) the pulse repetition rate of 180 Hz; 3) the timescale and degree of pulse repetition instability; 4) the phenomenology of the echo; 5) the number of oscillations per pulse; and 6) the frequency decay of approximately 1 kHz over the pulse duration.
  53. 53.
    Hickey J. Recorded sounds that plagued U.S. diplomats in Cuba just crickets hard at work. Berkeley News. 10 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zimmer C. The sounds that haunted U.S. diplomats in Cuba? Lovelorn crickets, scientists say. The New York Times. 4 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stone R. Cuban panel claims stress caused mystery illness. Science. 2017;358(6368):1236–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Berezow A. Sonic attack: Cuba playing us for fools. American Council on Science and Health News. 2017 Dec 6. https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/12/06/sonic-attack-cuba-playing-us-fools-12245. Accessed 26 Oct 2019.
  57. 57.
    Stone R. Sonic attack or mass paranoia? Science. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5386.
  58. 58.
    Golden T, Rotella S. The sound and the fury: inside the mystery of the Havana embassy. ProPublica. 2018 Feb 14. https://www.propublica.org/article/diplomats-in-cuba. Accessed 11 Nov 2019.
  59. 59.
    Medalia NZ, Larsen O. Diffusion and belief in a collective delusion. Am Sociol Rev. 1958;23:180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cantril H. The invasion from Mars: a study in the psychology of panic. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1947.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Radio listeners in panic, taking war drama as fact. The New York Times. 31 Oct 1938. p. 4.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bartholomew RE. Introduction. In: Wells HG, editor. The war of the worlds. New York: Cosimo Classics; 2012:v–ix. See pvi.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Scare is nation-wide. The New York Times. 31 Oct 1938. p. 4.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Women faint as lights go out at Concrete. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 31 Oct 1938. p. 1.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Terror spread here by hoax. Trenton Evening Times. 31 Oct 1938. p. 2.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Markush R. Mental epidemics: a review of the old to prepare for the new. Public Health Rev. 1973;2:353–442.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Marvin S. The halloween radio spoof that shook a nation. Parade. 29 Oct 1975. p. 4–5.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Radio war drama creates a panic. The New York Times. 31 Oct 1938. p. 4.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moore S, Ramirez M. 3 sickened Pacoima students ingested LSD; 11 others hospitalized 4th graders had no drugs in system. The Los Angeles Times. 25 Sept 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurology and Head and Neck SurgeryDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Psychological MedicineUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations