Advertisement

“What Justifies the Justifications?” Winch on Punishment and Justice

  • Lars HertzbergEmail author
Chapter
  • 9 Downloads
Part of the Nordic Wittgenstein Studies book series (NRWS, volume 6)

Abstract

In this essay I aim to clarify, and critically discuss, Winch’s thinking about punishment. Winch approached the philosophy of punishment in two essays. In “Ethical Reward and Punishment” (1970) he discussed a remark in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, which he interpreted as marking a sharp distinction between punishment in an ethical and a legal sense, a view which he endorsed. Against this, I argue that the two concepts of punishment are interdependent. In fact, in “‘He’s to Blame!’” (1989) Winch foregoes this sharp distinction. There he discusses the traditional philosophical concern with seeking for a justification of punishment. This quest is misconceived, he argues, because the practice of punishment is itself partly constituted by what justificatory concerns are relevant to it. If the justification of those concerns is taken to be an open question, the object of our inquiry is dissolved. I attempt to clarify this argument, partly by reference to the distinction between punishment and revenge. I end by discussing a problematic remark of Winch’s in which he seems once more to open up the possibility of asking for a wholesale justification of punishment.

Keywords

Moral philosophy Punishment Justification Ethics Philosophy of law 

References

  1. Mackie, J. (1986). Retributivism: A test case for ethical objectivity. In J. Feinberg & H. Gross (Eds.), Philosophy of Law (3rd ed., pp. 622–629). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  2. Rhees, R. (1990). ‘Ethical reward and punishment.’ In R. Gaita (Ed.), Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch (pp. 179–193). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Winch, P. (1970/1972). Ethical reward and punishment. In Ethics and Action (pp. 210–228). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Winch, P. (1989). He’s to blame. In D. Z. Philips & P. Winch (Eds.), Wittgenstein: Attention to Particulars: Essays in Honour of Rush Rhees (pp. 151–164). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Winch, P. (1992). Philosophy of Law and the State [Computer printout; lecture notes; 61 pp.]. Peter Winch Archives (GB 0100 KCLCA K/PP171, Box 16). King’s College London.Google Scholar
  6. Wittgenstein, L. (1921/1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  7. Wittgenstein, L. (1976). Cause and effect: Intuitive awareness (P. Winch, Trans.). In J. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Occasions (pp. 370–426). Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Wittgenstein, L. (1980/1998). Culture and Value (Rev. ed., G. H. von Wright & H. Nyman, Eds., Peter Winch, Trans., A. Pichler, Rev. Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2009). Philosophical Investigations (4th ed., P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte, Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Åbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations