Researching Education: Perspectives from Winch’s Approach to the Social Sciences

  • Christopher WinchEmail author
Part of the Nordic Wittgenstein Studies book series (NRWS, volume 6)


Peter Winch’s claim that the province of social science is one of philosophical as well as empirical enquiry is examined using education as an extended example. On Winch’s view, understanding a social institution or practice involves a grasp of its conceptual structure and this itself should be the subject of empirical investigation. Winch’s own criticism of his earlier position is compared with Rush Rhees’s critique of the Builders example in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations (1958/1967). Language games are not to be considered in isolation but as part of a society consisting of interconnected practices that taken together make sense. Education as a family of preparatory human practices is considered as an integral part of a society and, drawing on Vico, the complexity of education’s role in society is considered. The implications of this complexity for a conceptual investigation of education is outlined and a distinction is drawn between the concept of education and various operative conceptions which are the province of the empirical as well as the normative researcher. This approach to the study of education is illustrated through an extended example and the possibilities for an empirical investigation of education are considered.


Social sciences Vico Education Limiting notions Moral philosophy 


  1. Barrow, R., & Woods, R. (1974). An Introduction to Philosophy of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (1993/1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical analysis, with Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benner, D. (2003). Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Bildungstheorie. Weinheim and Munich: Juventa.Google Scholar
  4. Best, D. (1992). The Rationality of Feeling. Understanding the Arts in Education. Brighton: Falmer.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (1973). Class, Codes and Control (Vol. 1). London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  6. Brice-Heath, S. (1983). Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dromm, K. (2018). The difficulties with groundlessness. Philosophical Investigations, 41(4), 418–435.Google Scholar
  8. Everett, D. (2008). Don’t Sleep, there are Snakes. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  9. Gallie, W. B. (1955-6). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.Google Scholar
  10. Gingell, J. G. (2001). Against creativity. Irish Educational Studies, 20(1), 33–44.Google Scholar
  11. Glick, E. (2015). Practical modes of presentation. Nous, 49(3), 538–559.Google Scholar
  12. Goethe, J. (1796/1980). Wilhelm Meister’s Lehrjahre. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  13. Haldane, J. (1989). Metaphysics in the philosophy of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 23(2), 171–183.Google Scholar
  14. Hanf, G. (2010). The changing relevance of the Beruf. In M. Brockmann, L. Clarke, G. Hanf, P. Mehaut, A. Westerhuis, & C. Winch (Eds.), Knowledge, Skills and Competence in the European Labour Market. What’s in a Qualification? (pp. 50–67). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Howe, M. J. (1990). The Origins of Exceptional Abilities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Hume, D. (1741/2008). Of the dignity and meanness of human nature. In S. Copley & A. Edgar (Eds.), Selected Essays of David Hume (pp. 43–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kerschensteiner, G. (1906/1968). Produktiver Arbeit und ihr Erziehungswert. In T. Rutt (Ed.), Ausgewählte Pädagogische Texte (Band 2) (pp. 6–25). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
  18. Lynch, G. (2018). Meaning for radical contextualists: Travis and Gadamer on why words matter. Philosophical Investigations, 41(1), 22–41.Google Scholar
  19. Orchard, L., & Stretton, H. (1994). Public Good, Public Choice and Public Enterprise. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Pavese, C. (2015). Practical senses. Philosopher’s Imprint, 15(29), 1–25.Google Scholar
  21. Peters, R. S. (1981). Democratic values and educational aims. In Essays on Educators (pp. 32–52). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Plato. (2016). The Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Reid, I. (Ed.). (1987). The Place of Genre in Learning: Current debates. Geelong: Typereader Press, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  24. Rhees, R. (1959-60). Wittgenstein’s builders. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60, 171–186.Google Scholar
  25. Richter, D. (2018). Winch on understanding other people. Philosophical Investigations, 41(4), 399–417.Google Scholar
  26. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762/1968). Émile ou de l’Education. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  27. Ryle, G. (1946/1971). Knowing how and knowing that. In Collected Papers (Vol. 2, pp. 212–225). New York: Barnes and Nobles.Google Scholar
  28. Ryle, G. (1979). On Thinking. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, A. (1776/1981). The Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, 48(8), 411–444.Google Scholar
  31. Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2017). Skill. Nous, 51(4), 713–726.Google Scholar
  32. Streeck, W. (1992). Social Institutions and Economic Performance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Streeck, W. (2011). Skills and Politics: General and Specific. Cologne: Max Planck Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Vico, G. (1744/1968). The New Science of Giambattista Vico (revised translation of 3rd ed., T. G. Bergin & M. H. Fisch Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Winch, P. (1958/1990). The Idea of a Social Science (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Winch, P. (1964/1972). Understanding a primitive society. In Ethics and Action (pp. 8–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Winch, P. (1972). Ethics and Action. London: Routledge Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  39. Winch, P. (1990). Einheit: Voraussetzung oder Forderung? In O. Marquard (Ed.), Einheit und Vielheit: Proceedings of the XIV German Congress of Philosophy – Giessen, 21–26 September, 1987 (pp. 94–100). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Winch, P. (1997). Can we understand ourselves? Philosophical Investigations, 20(3), 193–204.Google Scholar
  41. Wittgenstein, L. (1958/1967). Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed. G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. Von Wright Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. Von Wright Eds., D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations