Advertisement

The Flexible

  • Annelies Van AsscheEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

I focus on the faculties of respectively polyvalence, flexibility, and adaptability as seen through the lens of contemporary dance. Drawing on my qualitative data, I conclude that a dance artist’s body ought to be polyvalent, flexible, and adaptable, but also their entire set of pragmatic transferable skills needs to be marked by polyvalence, flexibility, and adaptability in order to remain employable. I conclude that the fast, mobile, and flexible modi operandi bring about more adaptable pieces that do not necessarily require a theater space, but in line with the neoliberal logic they can be performed anywhere and anytime. In addition, I provide an in-depth discussion of how these three dimensions are reflected in dance performance, for which I carefully selected VOLCANO (2014) by Liz Kinoshita.

Keywords

Polyvalence Flexibility Adaptability Contemporary dance Employable Neoliberal logic Dance performance Liz Kinoshita 

References

  1. Birtchnell, Thomas, and Monika Büscher. 2011. Stranded: An Eruption of Disruption. Mobilities 6 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 18 (3–4): 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bröckling, Ulrich. 2016. The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Stefano, John. 2002. Moving Images of Home. Art Journal 61 (4): 38–53.Google Scholar
  5. Foster, Susan. 1997. Dancing Bodies. In Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance, ed. Jane Desmond, 235–258. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hesters, Delphine. 2004. De Choreografie Van De Danscarrière: Kwalitatief Onderzoek Naar De Carrières Van Hedendaagse Dansers in Vlaams-Brusselse Context. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, Shannon. 2011. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kedhar, Anusha. 2014. Flexibility and Its Bodily Limits: Transnational South Asian Dancers in an Age of Neoliberalism. Dance Research Journal 46 (1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kinoshita, Liz. 2014. Volcano Songbook. Caravan Productions/workspacebrussels/Pianofabriek/Vooruit.Google Scholar
  11. Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at Work: Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  12. Laermans, Rudi. 2015. Moving Together: Making and Theorizing Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  13. Malabou, Catherine, and Judith Butler. 2011. You Be My Body for Me: Body, Shape, and Plasticity in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. In A Companion to Hegel, ed. Stephen Houlgate and Michael Baur, 611–640. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McRobbie, Angela. 2016. Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Molz, Jennie Germann. 2006. Cosmopolitan Bodies: Fit to Travel and Travelling to Fit. Body & Society 12 (3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monten, Joshua. 2008. Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed… Eclecticism in Postmodern Dance. In The Body Eclectic: Evolving Practices in Dance Training, ed. Melanie Bales and Rebecca Nettl-Fiol, 52–67. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Morley, David. 2002. Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Natalio, Rita. 2014. Talking About Volcanoes: Interview with Liz Kinoshita. Departures and Arrivals [DNA]. http://departuresandarrivals.eu/en/texts/interviews/talking-about-volcanos—interview-with-liz-kinoshita-203. Accessed 26 August 2015.
  20. Parkinson, Chrysa, and Michael Helland. 2014. Curating Your Moves. Michael Helland in Conversation with Chrysa Parkinson. Stockholm: DOCH School of Dance and Circus, Stockholm University of the Arts. Sarma Archive. http://sarma.be/docs/3036. Accessed 11 December 2019.
  21. Peeters, Diederik. 2011. Bespiegelingen Van Een Sprinkhaan. Etcetera - Tijdschrift Voor Podiumkunsten 125: 3–6.Google Scholar
  22. Pewny, Katharina. 2011. Das Drama Des Prekären: Über Die Wiederkehr Der Ethik in Theater Und Performance. Theater. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Rosa, Hartmut. 2003. Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High-Speed Society. Constellations: An international Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 10 (1): 3–33.Google Scholar
  24. Schaffer, Kareth. 2013. An Awkward Split: Calculating vs. Flexible Performativity Exemplified by ‘Walking in Circles’ and ‘Mudwrestling for Meg’. Paper Presented at Inter-University Center for Dance (HZT), Berlin.Google Scholar
  25. Standing, Guy. 2014. A Precariat Charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  26. Van Assche, Annelies. 2018. Precarity: A Concept Linking Performance Studies and Social Sciences. In Interdisciplinarity and the Performing Arts: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Stefan Aquilina and Malaika Sarco-Thomas, 145–169. Valletta: Malta University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Van Assche, Annelies, and Katharina Pewny. 2018. The Brussels Dance Swarm on the Move: Precarious Bodies (Not) at Home. Forum Modernes Theater 28 (2): 117–132.Google Scholar
  28. Virno, Paolo. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  29. Wilkie, Fiona. 2015. Performance, Transport and Mobility: Making Passage. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GentBelgium

Personalised recommendations