Advertisement

Conclusion: Precarity’s Plural Character

  • Annelies Van AsscheEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

I come to conclude that the unfair and precarious working conditions contemporary dance artists specifically deal with are thus tied in with a more general point at issue affecting our society in late capitalism at large. However, saying ‘no’ collectively to these unfair and precarious conditions is extremely challenging in the contemporary dance sector, because many artists are still willing to work despite of the precarious conditions.

Keywords

Unfair Precarious Contemporary dance Capitalism 

References

  1. Abbing, Hans. 2008. Why Are Artists Poor: The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  2. BAVO. 2010. Too Active to Act: Cultureel Activisme Na Het Einde Van De Geschiedenis. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, Lynn. 2017. Hoe De Mens Een Batterij Werd (En De Economie Ons Tot Opladen Dwingt). De Correspondent, published electronically January 23. https://decorrespondent.nl/6043/hoe-de-mens-een-batterij-werd-en-de-economie-ons-tot-opladen-dwingt/201346717-edb06845. Accessed 11 December 2019.
  4. Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gielen, Pascal. 1999. Twintig Jaar Kaaitheater: Een Kleine Sociogenese. Humus Versus Humus 2: Van Zelflegitimering Naar Zelfkritiek. Etcetera - Tijdschrift Voor Podiumkunsten 67: 9–13.Google Scholar
  6. Hesters, Delphine. 2004. De Choreografie Van De Danscarrière: Kwalitatief Onderzoek Naar De Carrières Van Hedendaagse Dansers in Vlaams-Brusselse Context. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
  7. Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kalleberg, Arne L. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. American Sociological Association Rose Series in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Laermans, Rudi. 2004. De Draaglijke Lichtheid Van Het Kunstenaarsbestaan: Over De Onzekerheden Van Artistieke Carrières. De Witte Raaf 112: 14–15.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2015. Moving Together: Making and Theorizing Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  11. Lesage, Dieter. 2006. A Portrait of the Artist as a Worker. In A.C.A.D.E.M.Y., ed. Angelika Nollert, Irit Rogoff, Bart De Baere, Yilmaz Dziewior, and Charles Esche, 34–35. Frankfurt: Revolver Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Lorey, Isabell. 2006. Governmentality and Self-precarization: On the Normalization of Cultural Producers. In Art and Contemporary Critical Practice: Reinventing Institutional Critique, ed. Gene Ray and Gerald Raunig, 187–202. London: MayFly.Google Scholar
  13. Menger, Pierre-Michel. 2014. The Economics of Creativity: Art and Achievement Under Uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nobody’s Business. 2015. Mission Statement. https://nobodysbusiness.wordpress.com/project-description/. Accessed 11 December 2019.
  15. Precarious Resistance. 2016. Dancing Precarity: An Open Letter a Spam a Resistance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1G3GiRkzps. Accessed 11 December 2019.
  16. Purnelle, Bieke. 2017. Burn-out in de kunsten: de kwaal van een sector? Rekto: Verso – Tijdschrift voor Cultuur en Kritiek, published electronically September 18. https://www.rektoverso.be/artikel/burnout-in-de-kunsten-de-kwaal-van-een-sector. Accessed 11 December 2019.
  17. Sorignet, Pierre-Emmanuel. 2010. Danser. Enquête Dans Les Coulisses D’une Vocation. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  18. T’Jonck, Pieter. 2013. Dance in Flanders 2007–2013: An Outline of the Dance Landscape. In Perspective: Dance, ed. Vlaams Theaterinstituut, 11–30. Brussels: Vlaams Theater Instituut.Google Scholar
  19. Van Kerkhoven, Marianne. 2009. European Dramaturgy in the 21st Century: A Constant Movement. Performance Research 14 (3): 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GentBelgium

Personalised recommendations