Advertisement

Meaningfully Engaging Homeless Youth in Research

  • Annie SmithEmail author
  • Maya Peled
  • Stephanie Martin
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Meaningfully engaging young people in decisions that affect them benefits not only those youth but also the adults and agencies that support them, as well as the wider community. Youth participatory action research (YPAR) is an approach to facilitate youth engagement in research which has been increasingly implemented to enable young people to collaborate and influence decisions in areas where their voices are commonly excluded. This chapter offers examples of youth engagement projects and YPAR initiatives with vulnerable youth. It then focuses on an effective approach to engaging homeless youth in research, includes a discussion of the challenges and benefits of doing so, and offers some lessons learned for future projects wishing to engage homeless young people in the participatory action research process.

Keywords

Youth engagement Participatory action research Homeless youth 

References

  1. 1.
    Checkoway B. What is youth participation? Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33:340–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith A, Peled M, Hoogeveen C, Cotman S, McCreary Centre Society. A seat at the table: a review of youth Engagement in Vancouver. Vancouver: McCreary Centre Society; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BC Healthy Communities. Provincial youth engagement scan. 2011. http://bchealthycommunities.ca/res/download.php?id=961. Accessed 23 Aug 2018.
  4. 4.
    Paglia A, Room R. Preventing substance use problems among youth: a literature review & recommendations. J Prim Prev. 1998;20(1):3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Libby M, Rosen M, Sedonaen M. Building youth-adult partnerships for community change: lessons from the youth leadership institute. J Community Psychol. 2005;33(1):111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramey H, Rose-Krasnor L. The new mentality: youth-adult partnerships in community mental health promotion. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2015;50:28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeldin S, Petrokubi J, McCart S, Khanna N, Collura J, Christens B. Strategies for sustaining quality youth-adult partnerships in organizational decision making: multiple perspectives. Prev Res. 2011;18(Suppl):7–11.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramey HL. Organizational outcomes of youth involvement in organizational decision making: a synthesis of qualitative research. J Community Psychol. 2013;41(4):488–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hart RA. Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship. 1992. http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2018.
  10. 10.
    Zeldin S, Camino L, Mook C. The adoption of innovation in youth organizations: creating the conditions for youth-adult partnerships. J Community Psychol. 2005;33(1):121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeldin S, Christens BD, Powers JL. The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: bridging generations for youth development and community change. Am J Community Psychol. 2013;51:385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomason JD, Kuperminc G. Cool girls, inc. and self-concept: the role of social capital. J Early Adolesc. 2014;34(6):816–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ministry of Children and Family Development. Youth engagement toolkit: resource guide. 2013. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/family-and-social-supports/data-monitoring-quality-assurance/information-for-service-providers/youth_engagement_toolkit_resource_guide.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2018.
  14. 14.
    Morsillo J, Prilleltensky I. Social action with youth: interventions, evaluation, and psychopolitical validity. J Community Psychol. 2007;35(6):725–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peled M. Aboriginal next steps II: final evaluation report. 2010. http://www.mcs.bc.ca/pdf/ANS_Final_Evaluation.pdf. Accessed 5 Jun 2018.
  16. 16.
    Brown L, Strega S. Research as resistance: critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches. Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press/Women’s Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kindon SL, Pain R, Kesby M. Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    London JK, Zimmerman K, Erbstein N. Youth-led research and evaluation: tools for youth, organizational, and community development. New Dir Eval. 2003;98:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCreary Centre Society. Unspoken thoughts & hidden facts: a snapshot of BC youth’s mental health. 2016. http://www.mcs.bc.ca/pdf/Unspoken_thoughts_hidden_facts.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2018.
  20. 20.
    Peled M, Smith A, Martin S. Engaging experiential youth in a youth-led positive mental health research initiative. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Society for Child Indicators (ISCI), Montreal, Canada, Jun 2017.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peled M, Martin S, Smith A. Youth research academy: a model for engaging youth from government care in community-based research. Paper accepted for presentation at the European Scientific Association on Residential & Family Care for Children and Adolescents (EUSARF), Porto, Portugal, Sept 2018.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peled M, Smith A, Martin S. Research slam: creating a model of meaningfully-engaged youth research in an urban setting. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Urban Health (ICUH), Coimbra, Portugal, Sept 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McCreary Centre SocietyVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations