Advertisement

Parallel (Hi)Stories: A Subjective Approach to Energy-Efficient Design

  • Ana-Maria DabijaEmail author
Chapter
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Nicolae Iorga (Romanian historian and politician) once said that “who forgets doesn’t deserve.”

This aphorism can be extended to the history of any field of human activity, including the history of building materials, technologies, and styles. Periodically they are “reinvented” from new perspectives, with nuanced or new uses, but with the same defining elements.

Throughout history, buildings have been the “mirror” of their time: they preserve the ideas, values, beliefs, and culture of the era in which they were conceived and elevated, as well as customer values, achieved by economy and technology levels.

Going to the essence (and ignoring fashion and style), the principles of construction have not changed, and they can be identified in all the built heritage that we have inherited, from traditional homes to contemporary trends: high-tech, bioclimatic, eco-buildings, green, etc.

As we build on planet Earth, we need to consider the agents that are acting on buildings, both natural and anthropic. Nature’s laws must be respected: physics, chemistry, and biology are fundamentals, and as Oren Lyons said, (O. Lyons, The Ice is Melting (2004), in https://centerforneweconomics.org/publications/the-ice-is-melting/. Accessed 31 July 2019) “You can’t negotiate with a beetle. You are now dealing with natural law. And if you don’t understand natural law, you will soon.”

It therefore seems reasonable to use the forces of nature in the act of architectural creation and not defy them.

The building components, technologies, and products (because we only refer to them) have a periodic comeback to the present, each time with new contributions given by the technical progress, regarding new construction materials or new performances, while the principles of the whole constructive approach are (always) the same.

This work concerns – in parallel – several technological systems for construction from a geographical, spatial, and temporal perspective.

Keywords

Architecture Building technology Energy saving. 

References

  1. 1.
    O. Lyons, The Ice is Melting (2004), https://centerforneweconomics.org/publications/the-ice-is-melting/. Accessed 31 July 2019
  2. 2.
    Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2019
  3. 3.
    V. Olgyay, A. Olyay, Design with Climate. Bioclimatic Approach to Architectural Regionalism (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011R0305. Accessed 5 Jun 2019
  5. 5.
    Warming and ventilating apartments by the sun’s rays Inventor: Edward S. Morse, (1881), https://www.google.com/patents/US246626. Accessed 12 Aug 2019
  6. 6.
    M. Dabaieh, A. Elbably, Ventilated Trombe wall as a passive solar heating and cooling retrofitting approach; a low-tech design for off-grid settlements in semi-arid climates. Sol. Energy 122, 820–833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.005
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    D. Marasco, B. Hunter, P. Culligan, S. Gaffin, W. McGillis, Quantifying evapotranspiration from urban green roofs: A comparison of chamber measurements with commonly used predictive methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 10273 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vegetation-bearing architectonic structure and system Inventor White Stanley Hart, (1937), https://www.google.com/patents/US2113523. Accessed in 2019
  11. 11.
    W. Streicher, et al., On the typology, costs, energy performance, environmental quality and operational characteristics of double skin facades in European buildings, in Advances in Building Energy Research, Volume 1, ed. M. Santamouris (2007), p. 3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Poirazis, Double skin facades, in A Report of IEA SHC Task 34 ECBCS Annex 43, p. 29, Lund Institute of Technology, (2006). Accessed 12 Aug 2019Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Magill, A History And Definition Of Green Roof Technology With Recommendations For Future Research, Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale April 2011, http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132&context=gs_rp
  14. 14.
    C.G. Wark, W.W. Wark, Green Roof Specifications and Standards. Establishing an emerging technology The Construction Specifier, August 2003, Vol. 56, No.8, http://www.fussypainting.com/pdf/GreenRoof.pdf
  15. 15.
    FLL Guideline for the Planning, Execution and Upkeep of Green-Roof SitesGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strabo, “Geography XVI.1.5”, published in Vol. VII Loeb Classical Library edition, 1932, http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/16A∗.html#1.5translation. Accessed March 2018Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.G. Macqueen, Babylon (Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., Publishers, New York, 1965), p. 158Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Dalley, The Mystery of the Hanging Garden of Babylon. An Elusive World Wonder Traced (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.“Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism – Center of Architectural and Urban StudiesBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Romanian Academy – Commission of Renewable EnergiesBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations