Advertisement

Biocomposites from Biofibers and Biopolymers

  • K. Gopalakrishna
  • Narendra ReddyEmail author
  • Yi Zhao
Chapter
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Biobased composites are developed using either the reinforcement and/or matrix from renewable and biodegradable polymers. Although there are plenty of biobased resources available as reinforcements, there are limited numbers of bioresins. Also, the properties of composites developed using biobased resins are not suitable for commercial applications and biobased resins are expensive compared to common synthetic polymer based resins. Considerable efforts are being made to develop biobased resins or modify existing resins to reduce cost and improve performance. In this chapter, we report the latest developments in developing biobased composites classified based on the matrix used. In addition, the performance of the biobased composites under various environmental conditions has also been discussed. Due to the extensive literature available, we have considered studies that are distinct and have been reported in the recent years.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Narendra Reddy thanks the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for funding through the Ramalingaswami Reentry fellowship. Sincere thanks to Centre for Incubation, Innovation, Research and Consultancy and Jyothy Institute of Technology, Thataguni Bengaluru for facilitating the arrangments and encouraging us to complete the chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Nyambo, C., Mohanty, A. K., & Misra, M. (2010). Polylactide-based renewable green composites from agricultural residues and their hybrids. Biomacromolecules, 11(6), 1654–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siakeng, R., Mohammad, J., Hidayah, A., Sapuan, S. M., Mohammad, A., & Naheed, S. (2019). Natural fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: A review. Polymer Composites, 40(2), 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang, G., Xinjie, H., Houcheng, D., Xin, W., Shudong, J., Keqing, Z., et al. (2014). Combustion properties and thermal degradation behaviors of biobased polylactide composites filled with calcium hypophosphite. RSC Advances, 4(18), 8985–8993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di, L., & Gerardus, J. (2014). Composites with hemp reinforcement and bio-based epoxy matrix. Composites Part B: Engineering, 67, 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Senoz, E., Joseph, F. S., Kaleigh, H. R., Richard, P. W., & Melissa, E. N. M. (2012). Pyrolyzed chicken feather fibers for biobased composite reinforcement. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 128(2), 983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adekunle, K., Åkesson, D., & Skrifvars, M. (2010). Biobased composites prepared by compression molding with a novel thermoset resin from soybean oil and a natural-fiber reinforcement. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 116(3), 1759–1765.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramires, E. C., Jackson, D. M., Christian, G., Alain, C., & Frollini, E. (2010). Valorization of an industrial organosolv–sugarcane bagasse lignin: characterization and use as a matrix in biobased composites reinforced with sisal fibers. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 107(4), 612–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramires, E. C., & Elisabete, F. (2012). Tannin–phenolic resins: synthesis, characterization, and application as matrix in biobased composites reinforced with sisal fibers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(7), 2851–2860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta, A. P., Sharif, A., & Anshu, D. (2011). Modification of novel bio-based resin-epoxidized soybean oil by conventional epoxy resin. Polymer Engineering & Science, 51(6), 1087–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanzione, J. F., Philip, A. G., Joshua, M. S., John, J. L. S., & Richard, P. W. (2013). Lignin-based bio-oil mimic as biobased resin for composite applications. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 1(4), 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung, Y., Johan, O., lsson, R., Jingxian, L., Curtis, F., Robert, W., et al. (2013). A renewable lignin–lactide copolymer and application in biobased composites. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 1(10), 1231–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thakur, S., & Niranjan, K. (2013). Bio-based tough hyperbranched polyurethane–graphene oxide nanocomposites as advanced shape memory materials. RSC Advances, 3(24), 9476–9482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mati-Baouche, N., Hélène, D. B., André, L., Shengnan, S., Carlos, J. S. L., Philippe, L., et al. (2014). Mechanical, thermal and acoustical characterizations of an insulating bio-based composite made from sunflower stalks particles and chitosan. Industrial Crops and Products, 58, 244–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourdot, A., Tala, M., Alexandre, G., Chadi, M., Patricia, V., Céline, T., et al. (2017). Characterization of a hemp-based agro-material: Influence of starch ratio and hemp shive size on physical, mechanical, and hygrothermal properties. Energy and Buildings, 153, 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandrine, U., Benitha, V. I., Mai, T. H., & Maalouf, C. (2015). Influence of chemical modification on hemp–starch concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 81, 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Viel, M., Florence, C., Sylvie, P., & Christophe, L. (2019). Hemp-straw composites: gluing study and multi-physical characterizations. Materials, 12(8), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kremensas, A., Agnė, K., Saulius, V., Sigitas, V., & Giedrius, B. (2019). Mechanical performance of biodegradable thermoplastic polymer-based biocomposite boards from hemp shivs and corn starch for the building industry. Materials, 12(6), 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanifi, B., Orhan, A., & Ceyda, D. (2016). Mechanical, thermal and acoustical characterizations of an insulation composite made of bio-based materials. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feldmann, M., & Andrzej, K. B. (2014). Bio-based polyamides reinforced with cellulosic fibres–processing and properties. Composites Science and Technology, 100, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mittal, N., Ronnie J., Mona W., Tobias B., Karl, M. O. H., Fredrik L., et al. (2017). Ultrastrong and bioactive nanostructured bio-based composites. ACS Nano, 11(5), 5148–5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahmood, H., Muhammad, M., Suzana, Y., & Tom, W. (2017). Ionic liquids assisted processing of renewable resources for the fabrication of biodegradable composite materials. Green Chemistry, 19(9), 2051–2075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pupure, L., Newsha D., & Roberts J. (2014). Moisture uptake and resulting mechanical response of biobased composites. I. constituents. Polymer Composites, 35(6), 1150–1159.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Doroudgarian, N., Liva P., & Roberts J. (2015). Moisture uptake and resulting mechanical response of bio‐based composites. II. Composites. Polymer Composites, 36(8), 1510–1519.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michel, A. T., & Billington, S. L. (2012). Characterization of poly-hydroxybutyrate films and hemp fiber reinforced composites exposed to accelerated weathering. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 97(6), 870–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gómez, E., & Frederick, C. M. (2013). Biodegradability of conventional and bio-based plastics and natural fiber composites during composting, anaerobic digestion and long-term soil incubation. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 98(12), 2583–2591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Incubation, Innovation, Research and ConsultancyJyothy Institute of TechnologyBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of Nonwoven Materials and EngineeringCollege of Textiles, Donghua UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations