Advertisement

Virtual and Augmented Reality in Science Teaching and Learning

  • Charilaos TsichouridisEmail author
  • Marianthi BatsilaEmail author
  • Dennis VavougiosEmail author
  • George IoannidisEmail author
Conference paper
  • 24 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1134)

Abstract

The present research investigates the state-of-the-art concerning virtual and augmented reality lab environments, in science teaching and learning. Both environments are suggested as most appropriate for science education. The study explores the extent to which research has progressed concerning these new tools, while focusing on the extent to which actual educational trials in science classrooms have been completed. To this effect, 19 research papers were identified and reviewed. Conclusions are drawn as regards the effectiveness of these two lab environment types as a function of the age of students, today. The creation of educational VR and AR that resembles reality so closely that it is hard to differentiate between virtual, augmented, and real, thus creating a unified continuum, seems to finally be within our grasp, yet further research is needed as to their optimum use.

Keywords

Science education Virtual Reality Augmented Reality Mixed Reality Meta-analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Tsihouridis, Ch., Batsila, M., Vavougios, D., Ioannidis, G.S.: The timeless controversy between virtual and real laboratories in science education-“And the winner is…”. In: Auer, M.E., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds.) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 2, pp. 1539–1550. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-732014-6_20. ISBN 978-3-319-73203-9
  2. 2.
    Jonassen, D.H.: Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2000). 297 pagesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han, I., Black, J.B.: Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics. Comput. Educ. 57, 2281–2290 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freitas, R., Campos, P.: SMART: a SysteM of augmented reality for teaching 2nd grade students. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 2, BCS HCI, Liverpool, pp. 27–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai, S., Chiang, F.K., Wang, X.: Using the augmented reality 3-D technique for a convex imaging experiment in a physics course. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 29(4), 856–865 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiang, T.H.C., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, G.J.: An Augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 352–365 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsihouridis, Ch., et al.: The optimum equilibrium when using experiments in teaching. Submitted to International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahn, S., Ames, A.J., Myers, N.D.: A review of meta-analysis in education: methodological strengths and weaknesses. Rev. Educ. Res. 82(4), 436–476 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shelby, L.B., Vaske, J.J.: Understanding meta-analysis: a review of the methodological literature. Leis. Sci. 30, 96–110 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sapounidis, Th., Demetriadis, S.: Tangible versus graphical user interfaces for robot programming: exploring cross-age children’s preferences. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17, 1775–1786 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bakas, Ch., Katsikis, A., Mikropoulos, T.: Virtual reality as a mental representations creation tool: a science example. In: Dimitrakopoulou, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Conference ETPE (ICT in Education), Volume B, Aegean University, Rhodes, pp. 37–46 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patsalou, Th., Charitos, D., Martakos, D.: Evaluating the use of virtual environment to support chemistry teaching. In: Dimitrakopoulou, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Conference ETPE (ICT in Education), Volume B, Aegean University, Rhodes, pp. 491–496 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibanez-Espiga, B.M.: Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Comput. Educ. 71, 1–13 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., Yang, B.: Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 12, 2–14 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pirker, J., Lesjak, I.: An educational physics laboratory in mobile versus room scale virtual reality – a comparative study. i-JOE 13(8), 106–120 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., Almeida, L.: Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 33(4), 2–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akai, C.: Depth perception in real and virtual environments. An exploration of individual differences, Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science, School of Interactive Arts & Technology, University of British Columbia (1998). 109 pagesGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crăciun, D., Bunoiu, M.: Boosting physics education through mobile augmented reality. In: TIM17 Physics Conference, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1916, pp. 050003-1–050003-6. AIP Publishing (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017456. ISBN 978-0-7354-1608-6, pp. 1–6
  19. 19.
    Strzys, M.P., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Klein, P., Lukowicz, P., Knierim, P., Schmidt, A., Kuhn, J.: Physics holo.lab learning experience: using smartglasses for augmented reality labwork to foster the concepts of heat conduction. Eur. J. Phys., 1–14 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, K.-T., Ball, C., Francis, J., Ratan, R., Boumis, J., Fordham, J.: Augmented versus virtual reality in education: an exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 22(2), 105–110 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tibola, L.R., Herpich, F., Fernanda da Silva, P., Tarouco, L.M.R.: Experience in teaching science in virtual environment. Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res. 7(4), 23–43 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hussein, M., Natterdal, C.: The benefits of virtual reality in education – a comparison study, Bachelor of Science Thesis in Software Engineering and Management, University of Gothenburg Sweden, pp. 1–15 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Techakosit, S., Nilsook, P.: Using augmented reality for teaching physics. In: Proceedings of International e-Learning Conference, IEC, Global Trends in Digital Leaning, BITEC Banga, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 282–285 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nielsen, B.L., Brandt, H., Swensen, H.: Augmented reality in science education - affordances for student learning. NORDINA 12(2), 152–174 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ThessalyVolosGreece
  2. 2.Directorate of Secondary Education, Ministry of EducationLarissaGreece
  3. 3.University of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations